Reagan at 100 Still Inspires

“A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.” –Bertrand de Jouvenel

4156-Reagan thumbs Up.jpg

by Tina Grazier

Today marks the 100th anniversary of President Ronald Reagan’s birth. While pondering what I might write to honor this great man I recalled the many times he had taken to a microphone to inspire and urge the American people to greater individual accomplishment. He spoke of the entrepreneurial spirit and, through the power of leadership granted him, inspired aliveness and a host of new business activity. He also reminded us of the great principles that act as a foundation for our endeavors. He made us feel proud, once again, to be American citizens. Choosing among his words would be difficult. I finally settled on the following because it is appropriate to our situation today:

“Americans are, in their time of discontent, encouraged by doom and gloom criers who would have us believe our only salvation lies in becoming docile sheep for the government shepherd. I happen to believe government is not the solution to our problems – government is the problem.” – Ronald Reagan

Salvation through government is an idea whose time must end. We have now experienced the down side of the savior’s exciting message of hope. When we foolishly put our faith in a distant government as the solution to problems what follows is increased pain and suffering for all but the very wealthy. Big government is inefficient, complex and wasteful. Bigger government simply cannot, therefore, mark an improvement and it certainly will not leave a legacy we can proudly pass to future generations.

For decades Americans have listened to the voices that preach big government answers to problems. FDR gave us social security as part of the New Deal; social security has become a faltering bankrupt system that adds to our debt and overburdens our children and grandchildren. LBJ’s contribution to the big government ideal was the ever increasing “War on Poverty” welfare and Medicare systems. Both of these have added to our debt and placed excessive financial burdens on future generations. Jimmy Carter added two new departments, Education and Energy, to increase the size and scope of government. The Clinton presidency was spared a similar big government legacy only with the defeat of “Hillarycare” and the restraint of a newly elected Republican congress. George W. Bush moved that center further right but failed to get his social security reforms passed in Congress. Although he attempted to consolidate certain agencies he also created the very expensive Department of Homeland Security. President Obama has taken the helm and focused on two things: redistribution of wealth and growing the size and power of government. As Reagan himself might have said, “There they go again.”

Ronald Reagan was unable to reclaim the Republican form of government that the founders established and that he spoke of so eloquently but his ability to remind the American people of their identity and heritage remains strong and will act as a beacon for generations to come. As we consider the state of our nation, the massive debt, the lack of opportunity, the burdens we are leaving to our children, and as we continue to feel the financial burdens of expansive and intrusive government it would be wise to heed the wise words of our former president, Ronald Reagan:

“We are a nation that has a government–not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth. Our government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government, which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed.”

It has never in our history been so obvious that big government is not the answer. It is time for the people to dismantle the government bureaucracy that is costing us so very much in terms of dollars, lost dreams, and opportunity. We are not mere sheep; we can reclaim our power and take on the responsibilities of self governance. We are a nation of individuals, each with particular strengths and talents, and each with something of value to contribute. Together we can once again become a force to be reckoned with and a marvel for the world’s peoples to emulate. When free to pursue our own interests, to work and provide for ourselves, and to risk and follow our passions we also inspire and create opportunity for others. This dynamic of individual effort and individual responsibility works. Reagan knew that it because he lived it and witnessed it at work when he and his fellow Americans resolved to overcome the devastation of the great depression and to win WWII. It was the spirit of the individual that won these battles and it will be that same spirit that restores America to her vibrant dynamic self. We need only say no to the central planners in Washington and yes to our own divine spirits. It will be a difficult undertaking but no more so than what will befall the American people if we continue down this broken and dusty big government path.

I can’t think of a more fitting tribute to mark the 100th birthday of former President Ronald Reagan than to resolve together to throw off the chains and restraints of big government.

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents….” –James Madison

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Reagan at 100 Still Inspires

  1. Quentin Colgan says:

    We Should use the occasion to finally be honest with ourselves about what a leftist Ronny was.
    Here are ten things I found today.

    1. Reagan was a serial tax raiser. As governor of California, Reagan “signed into law the largest tax increase in the history of any state up till then.” Meanwhile, state spending nearly doubled. As president, Reagan “raised taxes in seven of his eight years in office,” including four times in just two years. As former GOP Senator Alan Simpson, who called Reagan “a dear friend,” told NPR, “Ronald Reagan raised taxes 11 times in his administration — I was there.” “Reagan was never afraid to raise taxes,” said historian Douglas Brinkley, who edited Reagan’s memoir. Reagan the anti-tax zealot is “false mythology,” Brinkley said.

    2. Reagan nearly tripled the federal budget deficit. During the Reagan years, the debt increased to nearly $3 trillion, “roughly three times as much as the first 80 years of the century had done altogether.” Reagan enacted a major tax cut his first year in office and government revenue dropped off precipitously. Despite the conservative myth that tax cuts somehow increase revenue, the government went deeper into debt and Reagan had to raise taxes just a year after he enacted his tax cut. Despite ten more tax hikes on everything from gasoline to corporate income, Reagan was never able to get the deficit under control.

    3. Unemployment soared after Reagan’s 1981 tax cuts. Unemployment jumped to 10.8 percent after Reagan enacted his much-touted tax cut, and it took years for the rate to get back down to its previous level. Meanwhile, income inequality exploded. Despite the myth that Reagan presided over an era of unmatched economic boom for all Americans, Reagan disproportionately taxed the poor and middle class, but the economic growth of the 1980s did little help them. “Since 1980, median household income has risen only 30 percent, adjusted for inflation, while average incomes at the top have tripled or quadrupled,” the New York Times’ David Leonhardt noted.

    4. Reagan grew the size of the federal government tremendously. Reagan promised “to move boldly, decisively, and quickly to control the runaway growth of federal spending,” but federal spending “ballooned” under Reagan. He bailed out Social Security in 1983 after attempting to privatize it, and set up a progressive taxation system to keep it funded into the future. He promised to cut government agencies like the Department of Energy and Education but ended up adding one of the largest — the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, which today has a budget of nearly $90 billion and close to 300,000 employees. He also hiked defense spending by over $100 billion a year to a level not seen since the height of the Vietnam war.

    5. Reagan did little to fight a woman’s right to choose. As governor of California in 1967, Reagan signed a bill to liberalize the state’s abortion laws that “resulted in more than a million abortions.” When Reagan ran for president, he advocated a constitutional amendment that would have prohibited all abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother, but once in office, he “never seriously pursued” curbing choice.

    6. Reagan was a “bellicose peacenik.” He wrote in his memoirs that “[m]y dream…became a world free of nuclear weapons.” “This vision stemmed from the president’s belief that the biblical account of Armageddon prophesied nuclear war — and that apocalypse could be averted if everyone, especially the Soviets, eliminated nuclear weapons,” the Washington Monthly noted. And Reagan’s military buildup was meant to crush the Soviet Union, but “also to put the United States in a stronger position from which to establish effective arms control” for the the entire world — a vision acted out by Regean’s vice president, George H.W. Bush, when he became president.

    7. Reagan gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants. Reagan signed into law a bill that made any immigrant who had entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty. The bill was sold as a crackdown, but its tough sanctions on employers who hired undocumented immigrants were removed before final passage. The bill helped 3 million people and millions more family members gain American residency. It has since become a source of major embarrassment for conservatives.

    8. Reagan illegally funneled weapons to Iran. Reagan and other senior U.S. officials secretly sold arms to officials in Iran, which was subject to a an arms embargo at the time, in exchange for American hostages. Some funds from the illegal arms sales also went to fund anti-Communist rebels in Nicaragua — something Congress had already prohibited the administration from doing. When the deals went public, the Iran-Contra Affair, as it came to be know, was an enormous political scandal that forced several senior administration officials to resign.

    9. Reagan vetoed a comprehensive anti-Apartheid act. which placed sanctions on South Africa and cut off all American trade with the country. Reagan’s veto was overridden by the Republican-controlled Senate. Reagan responded by saying “I deeply regret that Congress has seen fit to override my veto,” saying that the law “will not solve the serious problems that plague that country.”

    10. Reagan helped create the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. Reagan fought a proxy war with the Soviet Union by training, arming, equipping, and funding Islamist mujahidin fighters in Afghanistan. Reagan funneled billions of dollars, along with top-secret intelligence and sophisticated weaponry to these fighters through the Pakistani intelligence service. The Talbian and Osama Bin Laden — a prominent mujahadee commander — emerged from these mujahidin groups Reagan helped create, and U.S. policy towards Pakistan remains strained because of the intelligence services’ close relations to these fighters. In fact, Reagan’s decision to continue the proxy war after the Soviets were willing to retreat played a direct role in Bin Laden’s ascendancy.

  2. Toby says:

    If only we had some really old people who actually lived back in the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. I cant help but feel that if we had some input from people who lived in those horrible times they could really put the cherry on that cake of bullshit your frosting Q.

  3. Steve says:

    This “top 10” list of weak arguments against one of America’s most loved Presidents has been reposted numerous times on the internet. It’s a testament to Reagan that so many years after his death, so many would-be opinion leaders still try to bring down his name.

    It’s not so much of a testament to the person who posted it here that he reposts this garbage. Are we to believe Q is unhappy that Reagan wasn’t vocal enough on Right to Life issues, or that Q thinks Reagan was wrong for envisioning a world without nuclear weapons?

    Are we really to believe the faux anger that Reagan had a $3 trillion deficit, given the deficit under Obama is now 5 times as much?

    Reagan began the dream of conservatism, whether he stood the test of today’s conservative values or not. No one has ever claimed that he was perfect, quite the contrary, even Reagan admits himself that for a portion of his younger life he made the mistake of voting democrat too!

    Nice try, but sorry, no prize. Ronald Reagan remains a better inspiration for today’s America than anyone the left has put up for office since our nation’s birth. He remains our hero, and no carbon copied David Letterman styled top 10 list will change that.

  4. Tina says:

    When we fail to provide a full context along with a few facts, the true record isnt served. To that end let us add some color to what Quentin has shared:

    I dont think anyone who admires Reagan has ever said he was an anti-tax zealot but the intense descriptor does make for interesting copy. What we have done is make generalized statements about Reagans tax cuts and the dynamic effect those tax cuts had on the overall economy. What we have done is share the philosophy which is often different from the overall record as he worked within the confines and restraints of government with its checks and balances. There is a difference between being in the game and ones desires prior to the game. The quarterback doesnt always move the ball as well as he would like.

    Reagan became a big fan of reasonable income tax rates based on the Laffer Curve, a theory that demonstrates there is a point at which tax rates begin to have a negative impact on the private sector and lead to lost revenue to the state, a stagnating private sector and high unemployment. Rates that are too low (given the enormous size of government) would be unwise as well unless we can cut the size of government and reform entitlement spending moving it to the private sector. Government has no business playing at being in business so this would be more desirable. (see more about the Laffer Curve here:

    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/real-world-evidence-for-the-laffer-curve-from-the-government-of-washington-dc/

    the Laffer Curve simply reveals that higher tax rates will lead to less taxable income (or that lower tax rates will lead to more taxable income) and that it is an empirical matter to figure out the degree to which the change in tax revenue resulting from the shift in the tax rate is offset by the change in tax revenue caused by the shift in the other direction for taxable income.

    In California Reagan sought to keep a workable balance by advocating for lower taxes when they were strangling the private sector. Following the era of Edmond G Brown his position was right on the money!

    http://www.newgeography.com/content/001712-the-golden-state%E2%80%99s-war-itself

    Another was Edmund G. Pat Brown, elected in 1958, who oversaw an aggressive program of public works, a rapid expansion of higher education, and the massive California Water Project.

    But by the mid-1960sBrowns traditional progressivism was being destabilized by forces that would eventually transform liberal politics around the nation: public-sector workers, liberal lobbying organizations, and minorities, which demanded more and more social spending. This spending irritated the business interests that had formerly seen government as their friend, contributing to Browns defeat in 1966 by Ronald Reagan. Reagan was far more budget-conscious than Brown had been, and large declines in infrastructure spending occurred on his watch, mostly to meet a major budget deficit.

    In California under Pat Brown, 1959-1967, Californias population grew by 28%, spending rose 141% and after factoring for inflation per capita expenditures rose from $1309 to $2000, representing a 53% increase in real spending.

    By contrast under Reagan, 1967-1975 the population grew by 12%, Spending rose 121% and per capita spending went from $2000 to $2253 representing a 12.6% increase in spending.

    Reagan did raise taxes (he also froze government hiring) in order to balance the budgetas was required by the Constitution. Being a man of integrity, rather than tricks, he believed in following the law, however this does not diminish his belief that the people deserve to keep what they earn and government is both irresponsible and frivolous with the peoples money. Our readers can find out more about those years in Reagans words, written at the time, here:

    http://old.nationalreview.com/flashback/reagan200406080927.asp

    When I took office in 1967, we discovered that the promise of “no tax increases” could not be carried out. California was virtually insolvent, the previous administration having changed that state’s system of budgetary bookkeeping in a way that allowed the spending of 15 The state government was spending $1 million a day more than it was collecting.

    California, unlike the Federal Government, cannot print more money or pile up deficits. The governor is required to submit a balanced budget, and if any additional taxes are needed to balance revenues with spending, the constitution requires the governor to propose higher taxes.

    The federal deficit under Reagan, and the Democrat machine under Tip ONeal, did increase under Reagan. It peaked around 1984 as the Carter recession ended and then began to decrease in the years that followed. It peaked again under Bill Clinton (another recession) and then decreased dramatically under the Republican Congress. (see chart):

    http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/downchart_gs.php?year=1900_2010&view=1&expand=&units=p&fy=fy11&chart=G0-fed&bar=0&stack=1&size=1233_583&title=US Federal Deficit As Percent Of GDP&state=US&color=c&local=s&show=

    In the recession of 1981-82, the unemployment rate peaked at 9.7 percent, but it fell continuously for the next seven years. When Reagan left office, the unemployment rate was 5.2 percent. More importantly 18 million jobs were created under Reagan, many of which were entrepreneurial ventures started by average enthusiastic middle class and low income peopleremember the story of the homeless guy and his Famous Amos chocolate chip cookies?

    http://www.presidentreagan.info/unemployment.cfm

    President Reagans build up of our military, and the necessary spending that supported that build up, occurred after Jimmy Carters devastating neglect of our countries military readiness. It also was a key component in the fall of the Soviet Union. The decisions he made can be better understood when taken in context:

    http://millercenter.org/president/reagan/essays/biography/5

    the buildup had three objectives: strengthening the military in case of war, persuading European allies that the United States would not abandon them, and encouraging the Soviets to come to the bargaining table. Reagan gave military spending priority over his promise of a balanced budget, telling his advisers, “Defense is not a budget issue. You spend what you need.” *** This surge in military spending reaped a number of benefits. First, the military upgraded and modernized its forces and equipment. Second, the money invested in military-related research and development proved a spur to certain segments of the economy, especially the high-tech sector. Finally, the increases in defense spending, coupled with promises that the American military would again be unsurpassed, boosted the confidence of the public.

    Reagans position on abortion is supported by millions of Americans who believe that its important to honor and respect both the life and the reproductive process. Abortion used for personal convenience or avoidance of responsibility, or as a birth control method, is ugly, wrong, cruel, selfish and morally bankrupt. In the sixties and seventies abortion proponents claimed that abortions would be rare. They are not.

    The amnesty agreement was not well received in many circles and proved to be a mistake. Had the Congress had the courage/ability to include meaningful immigration reform in tandem it might have been a real positive. Reagans compassion for the people who had lived amd worked here for many years with American support (and very different circumstances from what we are now experiencing) was well placedhis solution incomplete.

    Our readers can find a quick accurate accounting of the Iran Contra scandal here:

    http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/history/A0825447.html

    If you ask me the real scandal at the time was Democrats like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry aiding and abetting the communist in South America and around the world:

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2004/10/kerrys_forgotten_communistcodd.html

    President Reagan took office in January, 1981. The release of the American hostages by Iran resolved only one of the many problems he inherited from the Carter Administration. Soviet troops had invaded Afghanistan. Marxist rebels had seized the nation of Angola in Africa. In Central America, Marxist guerrillas were attacking the El Salvador government and the Sandanistas had taken control of Nicaragua.

    In order to counter Soviet expansionist policy, President Reagan increased defense spending and began supporting freedom movements that were fighting against Communism. Liberal extremists in the Democratic Party and most of the media elite hated Reagan’s new policies. This was especially true about his support of the Contras fighting against the Sandanista government in Nicaragua.

    The Soviets were pursuing a plan for expansion through the creation and support of Communist client states in Central America. The documents revealed the connections between the governments of Cuba, Grenada and Nicaragua, together with support of the Marxist guerrillas in El Salvador.

    No doubt, some people reading this article are thinking that this is ancient history and doesn’t matter any more. They are wrong because there is a scandal here and many of the people involved are still members of Congress and members of the media elite.

    It starts with members of Congress paying a visit to the Sandanista leader of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega. They returned with a piece of paper signed by Ortega and once again, proclaimed that he was not a Communist, but a socialist. Several days later, Mr. Ortega made fools of these dupes by flying to Moscow to collect even more Soviet support. You would think that the members of Congress with the signed piece of paper would have been very angry. But not really.

    The Democratcontrolled Congress went on to pass the third in a series of amendments called the Boland Amendments. All three of these amendments were worded to prevent the President from supporting the Contras in their fight against Ortega’s communist government. Think about this: Congress knew about the Grenada documents. They knew Ortega had gone to Moscow for more Soviet support. And they still wanted to protect a Communist dictatorship from their own President.

    In 1990, there were elections in Nicaragua. At the time, the Soviet Empire was crumbling, President Bush had removed General Noriega from Panama, and the Contras had continued to pressure the Nicaraguan government. The Sandanistas agreed to the elections because thought they would win. Our American media conducted polls and said they would win. President Carter, who had had not tried to stop the Sandanistas from taking power, was part of the commission observing the elections.

    All the people who had opposed Reagan’s policies towards Nicaragua were poised to claim victory. A Sandanista win would prove President Carter was right when he didn’t oppose them. It would prove Congress was right when they passed the Boland Amendments. Our media also wanted to be right about refusing to believe President Reagan. But then something unexpected happened when the people of Nicaragua actually got their chance to vote. They threw the Sandanistas out of power because they wanted freedom instead of a Communist dictatorship.

    If you think that liberal members of Congress and the media finally admitted they were wrong and Reagan was right, you are dreaming. They did admit that democracy had triumphed. But, in a slant only our media could pull off, they gave credit to President Carter for overseeing a free and fair election.

    Reagan was right when he said that the so-called anti-Apartheid law “would not solve the serious problems that plague that country.” The approach to this problem was based more on politically correct considerations regarding race than on meaningful attempts to aid or assist the people. Reagan:

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1079/is_n2129_v87/ai_6285375/

    The report concludes that there has not been significant progress toward ending apartheid since October 1986, and that none of the goals outlined in Title I of the act–goals that are shared by the Administration and the Congress–have been fulfilled. Moreover, the South African Government’s response to the act over the past year gives little ground for hope that this trend will soon be reversed or that additional measures will produce better results.

    Reagan didnt support the do something even if its stupid line of thinkingfor that he was called racistnot much has changed since 1986!

    The Mujahedeen began under Carter according to his National security advisor!

    http://www.counterpunch.org/brzezinski.html

    Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

    Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.

    http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/6884.html

    it is important to remember just what we owe Jimmy Carter: a resurgent global Islamic radicalism, emboldened and directly aided by the Khomeini regime in Iran that he did so much to set in place.

    A sobering reminder of just how much Carter is responsible for Irans now sclerotic but still tenacious mullahocracy comes from Steven F. Hayward of the American Enterprise Institute in his new book, The Real Jimmy Carter (Regnery).

    Modern Islamic radicalism, of course, was born in Egypt in the 1920s, when Hassan Al-Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood, the primary progenitor of Hamas and Al-Qaeda. And even Al-Bannas movement was a reassertion of the political Islam that dated all the way back to the time of the Prophet Muhammad, and which had just gone into momentary eclipse when the caliphate, the seat of the political/religious successor of Muhammad, was abolished by the secular Turkish government in 1924. Although Islamic radicals achieved many partial successes in the five intervening decades, the Khomeini revolution was the first success of this newly assertive movement on a national scale and its effects on the global movement have been incalculable.

    And Carter was instrumental in this victory. Hayward tells the full story of how Carter, through passivity and indecision, allowed the situation in Iran to drift out of control.

    According to political analysts and Iran experts Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi and Elio Bonazzi, Brzezinski instituted a plan to train fundamentalist Afghan Islamic mujahidin fighters in Pakistan under CIA supervision for which Carters successor Ronald Reagan is often blamed. Zand-Bonazzi and Bonazzi also point out that the other major Islamist terrorist force active today is also the product of misguided policies of the Carter administration, which deliberately destroyed the Shah of Iran and allowed the Islamic Revolution to take place. Hamas and Hizbollah are direct emanations of the Islamic Republic of Iran, responsible for killing hundreds of Americans (recall the 1984 attacks on the US embassy and the Marine barracks in Beirut) and Israelis. Although Hamas and Hizbollah existed before Khomeini, he was instrumental in their becoming and remaining significant forces.

    And Khomeini owed his own political life to Carter. As the peanut President himself put it when Pahlavi made a final appeal for help to regain his throne in February 1979, Fk the Shah.

    There is a lot more to the historical record than a few stats or soundbites would ever reveal. Regan wasn’t able to accomplish all that he wanted and he made some mistakes. Big deal! He still represented America better than any other president in recent times and with dignity, competence, and grace

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.