Posted by Tina
“Marxism is a malignant tumor on the body of any country. This is another thing I learned during my years at the top of Marxist Romania. Marxism, like any cancer, works silently-you can feel it only after it has spread throughout the whole body, and then it is usually too late.”
Those of us born and raised in the United States of America have difficulty speaking about Marxism. We grew up in the sweet space of freedom, what could we possibly know about this controlling system? The answer is, we know only what we have read or have been told and so we realize we speak with little authority. And when our leftists friends tell us our concerns are nothing to worry about we shake out heads and wonder what it will take to open their eyes as we realize we are wasting our breath. They too have grown up in America and cannot imagine that the socialism they have embraced is a precursor, a wolf in sheep’s clothing, really and something to be feared and fought with every ounce of our resistance.
There are a few people living in the USA who do know first hand and can speak with authority about living under Marxism . One such person has joined PJ Media to share with us all that he knows. He speaks as a man who was once a true believer and who wrote the policy paper that would shape his former country’s fate. His website, Say No To Socialism begins this journey into the realities of what we now call progressivism with an aptly named article, “The socialist Mask of Marxism”.
Bookmark the page and learn from the experiences of Ion Mihai Pacepa, a former Romanian Marxist:
On “Say No to Socialism,” I will expose the real convictions of the Democratic Party, which is using undercover Marxism in order to transform the U.S. into a monument to itself. I am humbled and honored to be a part of PJ Media.
God bless you, sir. America needs your strong voice now.
Why is it that nobody on the Right pays any attention to what these communists sayuntil it serves their purpose?
I have read in this space a score of times, We cannot trust Obama simply because he is a Marxist, and Marxists are liars.
Now, you want me to believe this Marxist? I don’t think so!
Dear But…we have “paid attention” to the evils of Marxism at various times and under administrations of both parties so I have no idea what you mean when you say we only do it when it serves our “purpose”. Our purpose is to defend and support freedom and the capitalist system in whatever way we can. Our purpose is to expose and refute all threats to our freedoms and capitalist system whenever we get the opportunity
I ran across this mans webpage in my reading yesterday and thought our readers might find his perspective eluminating in this regard.
“I have read in this space a score of times, We cannot trust Obama simply because he is a Marxist, and Marxists are liars.”
Oh really? “Simply” because? Are you truly so dense as to think a label alone is the problem, even an accurate label?
For the record I have never said we can’t trust socialists, or Obama, simply because they are liars. I have said you can’t expect them to deliver or protect freedom but rather they seek to control and as a condition, create oppression and disfunction.
I don’t want you to “believe” anything. I do think there is something obvious that his experience might reveal within you. In other words, I think you know something that, if you were made aware and were willing to tell the truth, would literally set you free.
One more thing, But, I did not mention Obama in this piece nor did Mr. Pacepa. He did mention Democrats. I would add that it is not the average voter but the the leadership and a band of special interest supporters that hold the Marxist views that endanger our Republic.
You ask “Why is it that nobody on the Right pays any attention to what these communists say until it serves their purpose?”
We listen to everything you communist/socialist/liberals say. We hear it and we fight it every single day. Do not fear, we hear you. Come November, you will see how well we have been listening.
But, you said . . is right.
The proof is that you insult this person. Why call names like “Dense?” If the point could be made without insult, why don’t you? Obviously because you are mistaken, and the poin cannot be made, or it isn’t true.
Your search engine has been down for some time, but I will aver you have said Marxists cannot be trusted because they are Marxists. Do not call me a liar.
“Why is it that nobody on the Right pays any attention to what these communists say until it serves their purpose?”
What would be our purpose… the humble defense of democracy and freedom? Then we’re guilty and you got us! The evidence is overwhelming.
There’s almost not a day that goes by that we don’t have something to say about defending liberty and democracy.
What makes you think But, you said . . . is a communist/socialist/liberal?
What was in that question that tips you off?
Please explain! I want to vote for you in November, but if you keep coming up with these inane non-sequiturs, people are going to start thinking you can’t reason above a 6th-grade level!
Tina, Great article!
Candidate Obama was not vetted in 2008. That is a fact validated by the handful of links below connecting his past and present to individuals who either are or support communism, Marxism, socialism and Mao.
The wake-up alarm is ringing, how many will continue to hit the snooze button? When the dots that were hidden for so long are connected the picture is very clear.
The future of our country is at stake. Thomas Sowell pointed out in his article (The one I posted yesterday) Obama is a master of, Heads I win, tails you lose. Voters will need to decide if we want a free capitalist system or one the government gives us.
The Obama connections:
Ron Bloom:
Manufacturing Czar Ron Bloom, another Anita Dunn Mao Tse Tung lover in Obama’s whitehouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm-Fx5jTbPE
Anita Dunn:
Anita Dunn on Mao
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qDsrfy-Zvg
Cass Sunstein:
Economic crises could usher in socialism
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2360239/posts
Van Jones:
Keeping Up With Van Jones
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/keeping_up_with_van_jones.html
Speaking to the East Bay Express, Jones said he first became radicalized in the wake of the 1992 Rodney King riots, during which time he was arrested.
I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th, he said. By August, I was a communist.
http://www.wnd.com/2011/06/316001/
Valerie Jarrett:
Valerie Jarrett, Her Father-in-Law and The Communist Party
http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/1792
V. Jarrett on Van Jones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud_yNFnfrSI
Valerie Jarrett’s Show
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/08/valerie-jarretts-show
Jarrett’s office isn’t just about hiring anti-American presidential senior staff or inviting them to posh official dinners at the White House, though. Jarrett’s office, according to White House sources, was influential in advocating for the creation of a “chief diversity officer” (CDO) at the Federal Communications Commission, as well as numerous other senior positions on regulatory and advisory commissions within the federal government bureaucracy.
“One of the reasons they held off on nominating confirmable positions at agencies like the FCC was so the White House could look at the structure of those agencies and where they could create jobs more in line with the President’s thinking, so they create a post like diversity chief, and then we have a blueprint for the nominated chairs or staff directors to follow. That’s how we got [FCC CDO] Mark Lloyd,” explains a former Obama transition staffer.
Lloyd’s job is, in part, to look for ways to create more “diversity” in media ownership, a policy approach that is viewed as a backdoor way to put in place a kind of “Fairness Doctrine.”
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/08/valerie-jarretts-show
Bill Ayers:
Barack Obama and Bill Ayers: Stanley Kurtz Makes the Connection
Despite having authored two autobiographies, Barack Obama has never written about his most important executive experience. From 1995 to 1999, he led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), and remained on the board until 2001. The group poured more than $100 million into the hands of community organizers and radical education activists.
The Obama campaign has struggled to downplay that association. Last April, Sen. Obama dismissed Mr. Ayers as just “a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” and “not somebody who I exchange ideas with on a regular basis.” Yet documents in the CAC archives make clear that Mr. Ayers and Mr. Obama were partners in the CAC. Those archives are housed in the Richard J. Daley Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago and I’ve recently spent days looking through them.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/rich-noyes/2008/09/23/barack-obama-bill-ayers-stanley-kurtz-makes-connection#ixzz1xhbW7Vyo
If you ask me But you said IS Observer.
At the risk of Oblivious thinking bad things about me, I will as usual stand by what I said. If I am proven incorrect I will be more than happy to apologize for insulting Mr/Mrs/Miss But, you said.
That’s one thing about grounded conservative’s, they stand ready to admit their mistakes if proven wrong, unlike most wild eyed liberals who have no such humility, integrity or common sense.