The Pooring of America – Obama’s Tactics are Working

by Jack

RECENT HEADLINES:

  • American families got poorer in the first decade of the 21st century. The wealth of the median U.S. household — the family at the middle of the middle class — fell from $106,000 in 2001 to $77,000 in 2010.
  • According to a new study from the Employee Benefit Research Institute, the rate of poverty is rising among Americans and especially older Americans.
  • The proof is in the numbers: How in the world can anyone claim that things are getting better? Sometimes the numbers are so clear that they simply cannot be denied. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, median household income in the United States fell from $51,726 in 2008 to $50,221 in 2009 and it continues to decline. In other words, America is getting poorer.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to The Pooring of America – Obama’s Tactics are Working

  1. Chris says:

    This headline is really unintentionally funny, considering that for the vast majority of the time period you’re talking about, Obama was not president.

  2. Post Scripts says:

    Like I said Chris, W brought the ball to the 50 yard line, but it was Obama that drove it home. These things never happen by just one party or the other. Somebody has to be the negligent party and somebody has to have an hot agenda and together that spells trouble for… us.

  3. Chris says:

    Obama’s policies kickstarted the recovery. The stimulus and the bailouts worked, as I have shown in comments to other articles today. The PPACA is set to reduce the deficit. Your party is against all of these measures and will increase the deficit while also decreasing social services and lowering taxes on the wealthiest Americans. The choice is clear.

  4. Joseph says:

    Both of these parties are corrupt and immoral.

    They both will take us to national bankruptcy and to hell, just with different routes and timetables.

    But make not mistake, the train’s destination is the same.

    All aboard!!!

  5. Tina says:

    The left will do whatever it can to convince the people that the rich are hording selfish greedy takers at the expense of the rest of us.

    Those who care about more than politics can read other points of view here:

    http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/07/income-inequality-vs-wealth-inequality/

    Recently, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its latest statistics on income inequality. Economists, bloggers and others have been furiously debating their implications. Over at the American Enterprise Institute, Jim Pethokoukis has been bludgeoned by various left-wing bloggers for pointing out that the story of growth of income inequality is much more complicated than the simple version spun by the CBO, and that there exists a considerable amount of evidence that income inequality hasnt gotten worse since the 90s.

    http://www.aei-ideas.org/2011/11/income-inequality-and-the-education-of-jonathan-chait/

    http://www.aei-ideas.org/2011/11/the-one-chart-that-explodes-the-myth-of-us-income-inequality/

    http://www.aei-ideas.org/2011/11/the-one-chart-that-explodes-the-myth-of-us-income-inequality/

    http://www.columbia.edu/~wk2110/bin/estate-NBER.pdf

    http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/confusing-wealth-income

    THE QUESTION THIS ELECTION IS DO YOU WANT TO LIVE IN A COMMUNIST COUNTRY? IF YOU DO VOTE FOR OBAMA AND THE ELIXABETH WARRENS OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.

  6. Peggy says:

    My heart breaks for my son, Chris, all the other young people their age and their children. They’ve been robbed of having a better future then we did.

    Read the last line twice! “Lowest ever measured.”

    How sad, todays Rasmussen Report shows, “just 14% believe todays children will be better off than their parents. Thats the lowest level of optimism ever measured.”

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

  7. Post Scripts says:

    Peggy, I’ve never seen this country is such bad shape and I’ve kept a pretty close on eye on what’s going on since I was in my 20’s. It is really scary. To see our debt equal to the national product is almost beyond comprehension. And yet some people like Chris think Obama is doing a wonderful job? He ran up a credit card at the bar and bought everybody drinks, it might feel great at the time but that doesn’t mean anything, because tomorrow we all get to pay his tab. How’s that helping solve anything?

  8. Chris says:

    “THE QUESTION THIS ELECTION IS DO YOU WANT TO LIVE IN A COMMUNIST COUNTRY?”

    No, that is not the question. Only a hysterical idiot would think it was.

  9. Chris says:

    “Reagan proved deficits don’t matter.” –Dick Cheney

  10. Peggy says:

    It really is sad Jack to believe the next generation will not have a better life because theyll be paying for what we did. Parents used to save for their kids college education, but not any more. They need it to just survive, pay the mortgage if theyre still fortunate enough to have a home, or the rent if theyve lost one.

    I gave up trying to get my degree so I could put in the overtime, work a second job, sell real estate to insure my boys got their degrees and had a better life. It wasnt easy doing it alone their last ten years of education, but Id do it again in a minute. Education cost are out of control now. Student loans and grants are a guarantee the students life will most likely not be better for 10-20 years paying their loans off and the taxpayers paying off the grants.

    Education should be controlled at the state and local levels. Shut down the federal level. Money that is going to support whats going on in DC should stay local.

    Now, everyones drinking at that bar yelling for another round expecting the next group of people to do the same. Its the biggest Ponzi scam in the universe, and we all know how they end.

    Like I said its sad. With so many thinking they can have it all by just putting it on a credit card its guaranteed their lives wont be better then ours. It will definitely be worse because of all the additional taxes and higher taxes theyll have to pay instead of having a better life.

    Why cant they see or understand that running a government is basically the same as a business and even a family budget? You cant spend more then you have. You cant go on vacation if the money is needed for rent, food, clothes.. You just dont! Not now, not ever!

    Just look at what the GSA and the Ninth Circuit Court is doing. Spending millions and millions for conferences in Los Vegas, Hawaii, Florida. We send billions to countries that hate us. We spend trillions on wars in countries that the Muslim Brotherhood cant wait to take over.

    StopStop it all. Tell the judges to hold their conference in San Francisco where they have the facilities to hold conventions for huge corporations. Why do we have to pay a million dollars for them to have a vacation in Hawaii? Senator Sessions tried to get them to cancel it, but they refused. Someone must be in charge to make them.

    Where is that someone? Its us, and if we dont stop it now it never will.

    What we know is Obama hasn’t done it and probably won’t or can’t, because he doesn’t have the ability to do so.

  11. Tina says:

    Chris: “No, that is not the question. Only a hysterical idiot would think it was.”

    Thank you for sharing.

    Dick Cheney was right, in context. Deficits don’t matter when growth to GDP is kept within reason. Debt can be handled when there is a strong and growing economy. Under Obama we have the opposite. The economy is bumping along at the bottom of the pool threatening to drown and debt is growing and growing and growing. We won’t be able to manage the interest, let alone the debt, if this trend continues.

    Most presidents prior to Obama kept the debt to GDP ratio under 20%. I just posted the following in another comment but so what:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-facts-about-the-growth-of-spending-under-obama/2012/05/24/gJQAIJh6nU_blog.html

    One common way to measure federal spending is to compare it to the size of the overall U.S. economy. That at least puts the level into context, helping account for population growth, inflation and other factors that affect spending. Heres what the White Houses own budget documents show about spending as a percentage of the U.S. economy (gross domestic product):

    2008: 20.8 percent

    2009: 25.2 percent

    2010: 24.1 percent

    2011: 24.1 percent

    2012: 24.3 percent

    2013: 23.3 percent

    In the post-war era, federal spending as a percentage of the U.S. economy has hovered around 20 percent, give or take a couple of percentage points. Under Obama, it has hit highs not seen since the end of World War II completely the opposite of the point asserted by Carney. Part of this, of course, is a consequence of the recession, but it is also the result of a sustained higher level of spending.

    The thing that makes this level of spending even more dangerous (stupid) today is the Baby Boomers and the unsustainable plans that will be sucked dry and then some in the next few years. Republicans have tried for years to do something about it. What does Obama do…he adds another plan that will be just as costly and just as unsustainable while at the same time spending money like a drunken sailor.

    Chris you called me an hysterical idiot. I will not call you names but I will suggest this is your future debt that is piling up. The rich do not have enough money to cover this debt. The government will come after the middle class…that will be you if you can find a job. If you cna’t it won’t matter…we will all be communists then.

    Smarten up…you are being taken for a terrible ride into the worst kind of hell and you are just too young and inexperienced to know it.

    If you wanted to grow your own personal wealth would you ask President Obama or Mitt Romney for advice? Hint: The O man doesn’t have a clue.

  12. Chris says:

    Tina, can you give me your definition of what a communist country is? And are there any industrialized nations left in the world that are NOT communist countries by your definition? If so, what are they?

    Israel has a nationalized healthcare system with far more government control than Obama has advocated. Are you willing to call Israel a communist country?

    Mitt Romney isn’t. In perhaps one of the most ironic political moves ever, Romney heaped praise on Israel’s nationalized health care system during his recent visit. Romney said:

    “When our health care costs are completely out of control. Do you realize what health care spending is as a percentage of the GDP in Israel? 8 percent. You spend 8 percent of GDP on health care. And youre a pretty healthy nation. We spend 18 percent of our GDP on health care. 10 percentage points more. That gap, that 10 percent cost, let me compare that with the size of our military. Our military budget is 4 percent. Our gap with Israel is 10 points of GDP. We have to find ways, not just to provide health care to more people, but to find ways to finally manage our health care costs.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/30/romney-praises-health-care-in-israel-where-strong-government-influence-has-driven-down-costs/

  13. Tina says:

    Chris which countries are communist isn’t the point. The point is policy that is communist inspired rather than capitalist inspired…that values power in Washington over freedom…that values the collective over the individual.

    I have no desire to play student to your teacher so no, I will not name countries for you that I think are communist. I think you are smart enough to know that yourself.

    I will say that to the degree that democracies have adopted communist principles we find they are also deeply in debt and lacking in economic opportunity for the majority of the people. We find a growing swath of capable people that are totally dependent on others (takers) or if they work greedy about keeping state mandated perks (long paid vacations, paid time off work for illness, death in the family, dog to the vet, birth of a child, pensions, healthcare) Business cannot sustain an economy that has such low production from the citizens working or not working and make no mistake…business is where wealth (the economy) is generated.

    “Israel has a nationalized healthcare system with far more government control than Obama has advocated. Are you willing to call Israel a communist country?”

    Israel is the size of Rhode Island. If Rhode Island wanted to create a state sponsored health care system I wouldn’t live there but I would honor the right of the people to make what I consider a mistake.

    As for health care costs no one has argued that they need to come down. We have argued about how to achieve that goal in America. Another big FAT government bureaucracy isn’t the answer.

    Leave it to liberals to jump on Romney’s remarks and make them something they were not. His praise was for their cost efficiency:

    http://www.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2012/08/01/mitt_romney_praises_israeli_health_system_even_though_it_is_more_government_run_than_obama_health_law/?page=full

    Romneys campaign said it was a stretch to view his comments as praising the entire Israeli health care system, saying he was simply commenting on its lower costs and was criticizing the US system more than he was praising the Israeli one.

    The governor was criticizing our broken health care system and the failure of Obamacare to address the health care challenges facing our country, said a Romney campaign spokesman, Ryan Williams. …

    Kevin Tabb, the chief executive of Boston-based Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, spent most of his adult life in Israel, including medical school and residency. He said the system in Israel is much different from the one in the United States. …

    There are some downsides to the Israeli health care system, which could be some reasons why the costs are lower. The countrys hospitals many of which are government-owned and operated are often over capacity, which means patients are routinely kept on gurneys in hallways or in waiting rooms. For nonemergency procedures, such as a hip replacement, patients may have to wait several months.

    Embracing or settling for an inferior solution for this country is not smart, especially when it will cost much more for the bureaucracy than projected and drive other costs up. The tax on medical devices is one example. Higher insurance premiums is another.

    I’m in favor of fixing problems in our health care. This big bureaucratic federal solution is not the wise way to go. The federal government can help…by enacting policies that inspire and incentivize the private sector to bring costs down.

  14. Tina says:

    Regarding communist countries John Sununu had a brief exchange with Juan Williams last night on Hannity’s show. Said Sununu:

    “Obama gets endorsed by Hugo Chavez and Romney gets endorsed by Lech Walesa”

    Lech Wilesa earned his Nobel Peace Prize and established a republic in the midst of the soviet bloc countries. His country still suffers from the effects of that oppressive system, including a failing healthcare system.

    Like I said. This election is about whether or not you want to live in a communist country. A vote for Obama is a vote for more government control over every aspect of your life…a move toward a communist model and general decline.

  15. Libby says:

    No, no, no … we are not going to forget who made the poor people poorer. The worst you can say about Obama is that his policies haven’t turned it around.

    But I’m not sure I’m going to let you say that, because for half of his first term he’s been saddled with a Congress that won’t enact nothin’ at all. We’s just wallowing.

    So, make up your minds. Either you retire the Freshman Class or you elect Romney. But DO something!

  16. Tina says:

    Jack this is terrific! A man that describes our entitlement society and has nonpartisan solutions!!!

    From the second link in your article…

    http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pub/reports/201112PSI_issue.html

    On political corruption:

    Here’s a simple solution. Hold the senators and congressmen personally liable for any deficit, each year. We elected these people to be our leaders. We did not elect them to spend us into bankruptcy. We did not elect them to feather their own nests with unlimited public spending. We did not elect them to buy votes. The only way to stop what’s happening is to make them personally responsible for their actions. Either they will balance the budget or face personal financial ruin.
    Demanding personal accountability for fiduciary responsibilities would have an immediate and profound impact on our society. It would wipe out the entitlement mentality that’s destroying our society almost overnight.

    Restoring personal accountability is also crucial if we hope to restore confidence in our public corporations and capital markets, which were once the broadest, most efficient, and most trusted in the world.

    On corporate corruption:

    What can you do about the corruption of America’s public companies? Here’s a very simple solution: Make the board of directors personally liable for fraud, negligence, and depositor losses. If you’re on the board of MF Global, for example, and your firm fails because your CEO bet $6.3 billion in Italian bonds your depositors who are still missing more than $1 billion ought to be allowed to sue you personally. Currently, a combination of legal liability limits and insurance (so-called D&O policies), paid for by the corporation, prevent any real personal liability even in clear cases of fraud.

    Franklin Raines, for example, who had Fannie Mae’s accounting set up to maximize his annual bonuses in violation of accounting standards was fined $2 million in a settlement with regulators. An insurance company paid the fine. The company paid the premiums on that policy.
    The concept of the corporate shield for legal liability was created so that limited partners (like common-stock holders) couldn’t be held liable for the damages caused by the general partner’s actions or misdeeds. Over time, that shield has been extended to the general partners of public companies the board of directors and the executive management team. But these people are paid to run the company. If they engage in fraud or are negligent in their duties, they ought to be held liable.
    If you were to simply make that one legal change, the conduct of America’s corporations especially those with fiduciary responsibilities to depositors would change overnight. Confidence in America’s public companies and capital markets would soar. But… as long as the idea of entitlement remains ascendant, dictating that executives keep most of the profit but none of the risk… our capital markets will continue to suffer and the management of our public companies will be rife with negligence and fraud.

    The problem is the sense of entitlement…how do we elect people with the fortitude to act on these solutions…and then follow through year after year…and without education reforms as well how do we recreate a responsible society?

    Still a very good read!

  17. Tina says:

    Half of his first term he had a super majority congress…they didn’t need a single Republican vote…and nothing was done to kick start the overall economy.

    Instead they saddled the country with piles of new expensive regulations, impending taxes, and another unsustainable entitlement program. The administration is downright hostile to the energy industry. Spending down a rat hole seems to be the favored game and that includes war spending…where’s the uproar over that Libby?

    ALL of this and more acts as a deterrent to business, hiring and economic growth.

    The freshman class will get along just fine with Romney. God help them…the hole we’re in is very deep and filling with water fast.

  18. Libby says:

    “Half of his first term he had a super majority congress….”

    And the big banks didn’t implode. I know lots of us would have experienced a great deal of visceral satisfaction if they had … but it’s probably better they didn’t.

    We’re actually starting to see positive benefits, monetarily speaking, from the Healthcare Act, in only three years; that’s very good for a policy change.

    Down here in Urbanville, we’re seeing lots of road, bridge and public transit work. That’s all to the good.

    It could be better, but in the circumstances, we’re doing well enough.

    But if the Freshman Class is not retired … I shudder to think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.