Another Sad Day in Afghanistan

Posted by Jack

AP – “A newly recruited Afghan village policeman opened fire on his American allies on Friday, killing two U.S. service members minutes after they handed him his official weapon in an inauguration ceremony. It was the latest in a disturbing string of attacks by Afghan security forces on the international troops training them.

Later Friday, an Afghan soldier turned his gun on foreign troops in another part of the country and wounded two of them, a spokesman for the NATO coalition said.

The attacks in the country’s far west and south brought to seven the number of times that a member of the Afghan security forces — or someone wearing their uniform — has opened fire on international forces in the past two weeks.

Such assaults by allies, virtually unheard of just a few years ago, have recently escalated, killing at least 36 foreign troops so far this year. They also raise questions about the strategy to train Afghan national police and soldiers to take over security and fight insurgents after most foreign troops leave the country by the end of 2014.”

Editorial: A good portion of these murderous attacks are retribution or honor killings. Why? What horrible thing could cause an ally to turn on us? It could be because of a perceived insult, a rumor over a Koran burning, maybe just an American soldier flirting with an Afghan female. It could be the killing of a distant relative or a friend by US forces, or just the mere presence of Westerners on Afghan soil. Any number of things can provoke an Afghani into murderous violence (honor killings) as our naive politicians are slowly starting to figure out.

To make matters worse, the ROE, rules of engagement (Obama’s rules) are so restrictive that it forces us into a disadvantage in every gun fight…it’s all political….and to think we were not going to do that THIS time, were we? This was not going to be another Vietnam, right? Then again, Bush made that promise, not Obama.

We’re fighting a losing battle when politicians (Obama) run it, and were losing hope because we are up against a cultural that shares few of our values and flaunts many things we consider perverted. This is especially true among the more primitive people living outside the city. They have been acting in a tribal mindset for thousands of years and no amount new water wells or concrete school houses will fix this.

There can be no success with a culture where it’s common practice for the men to use little boys for anal intercourse when a female isn’t around. This is only one of the many things that makes it impossible for our soldiers to have any sort of respect or effective relationship with people who embrace such a culture.

The treatment of women is another problem. In Afghanistan it’s not unusual for girls as young as 11 to be forced to marry older men, then brutalized and forced into a lifetime of service. Sexual mutilation is also a custom.

In a recent case, US forces rescued a 13 year old homeless girl was imprisoned in a windowless room filled with rotting hay and animal dung. She had been repeatedly beaten and both eyes were black and swollen shut. Her terrible crime for such an inhuman punishment? She dared refused to prostitute herself or have sex with her husband-to-be and his family went along with this!

In another case a middle aged man sought to marry a young teenage girl, but she rebuked his advances and her father refused to give his permission. So the suitor collected 6 of his pals, did a sneak attacked on the family, mutilating everyone before he dumped a bucket of acid on the little girl’s face. What’s especially noteworthy is he had no trouble finding 6 friends to help. Stories like this are too common and it begs the question…what are we doing there?

It is destroying our moral to know this crap is happening right in front of us and there’s not one thing we can do about it.

If we were on a mission to hunt down kill every rotten SOB like the above noted sub-humans, I could remotely justify our presence. In that case I would say we stay just long enough to let them know how our culture feels about their culture…a sick culture that rapes little boys and beats up and tortures women.

I would say we should forget trying to work side by side with them and their corrupt society…we go for total domination. We treat them with the carrot or stick method and the stick being any means of causing their death. If we can’t do that, then we should just get out and leave them to rot in their own corruption! Then the enlightened world should turn their back in disgust on this Hell hole.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Another Sad Day in Afghanistan

  1. Tina says:

    There’s no way to know whether different leadership would have had a different outcome but one thing is clear to me, President Obama has been a lousy leader in terms of conducting war and the balancing act that is required in negotiating with corrupt regimes. He’s really good at trampling all over those willing to work as allies.

  2. Harriet says:

    Interesting that the media is very quiet about the murders of our military. When Bush was president they made a huge deal of every death, not so much to honor the Soldier but as a slap to Bush, it was disgraceful, we rarely hear anything today, except as a two line event.

  3. Tina says:

    They also aren’t talking about the refugees. fleeing the war zones. Lots of Bush bashing on that too.

    The media, like our President, likes to pretend we have been “saved” from the ravages of war under Obama!

  4. Tina says:

    Caroline Glick has an excellent article today on the mess in the Middle East:

    http://jewishworldreview.com/0812/glick081712.php3

    Obama administration officials have behaved as though nothing has happened, or even as though Morsy’s moves are positive developments. For instance, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, one administration official dismissed the significance of Morsy’s purge of the military brass saying, “What I think this is, frankly, is Morsy looking for a generational change in military leadership.”

    The Wall Street Journal reported that Egypt’s new Defense Minister Field Marshal Abdul-Fattah el-Sissi is known as a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer. But the Obama administration quickly dismissed the reports as mere rumors with no significance. Sissi, administration sources told the Journal, ate dinner with US President Barack Obama’s chief counterterrorism advisor John Brennan during Brennan’s visit to Cairo last October. Aside from that, they say, people are always claiming that Morsy’s appointments have ties to Morsy’s Muslim Brotherhood.

    A slightly less rose-colored assessment came from Steven Cook in Foreign Affairs. According to Cook, at worst, Morsy’s move was probably nothing more than a present day reenactment of Gamal Abel Nasser’s decision to move Egypt away from the West and into the Soviet camp in 1954. Most likely, Cook argued, Morsy was simply doing what Sadat did when in 1971 he fired other generals with whom he had been forced to share power when he first succeeded Nasser in 1969.

    Certainly the Nasser and Sadat analogies are pertinent. But while properly citing them, Cook failed to explain what those analogies tell us about the significance of Morsy’s actions. He drew the dots but failed to see the shape they make.

    Morsy’s Islamism, like Mao’s Communism is inherently hostile to the US and its allies and interests in the Middle East. Consequently, Morsy’s strategic repositioning of Egypt as an Islamist country means that Egypt – which has served as the anchor of the US alliance system in the Arab world for thirty years — is setting aside its alliance with the US and looking toward reassuming the role of regional bully.

    Egypt is on the fast track to reinstating its war against Israel and threatening international shipping in the Suez Canal. And as an Islamist state, Egypt will certainly seek to export its Islamic revolution to other countries. No doubt fear of this prospect is what prompted Saudi Arabia to begin showering Egypt with billions of dollars in aid.

    It should be recalled that the Saudis so feared the rise of a Muslim Brotherhood ruled Egypt that in February 2011, when US President Barack Obama was publicly ordering then Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak to abdicate power immediately, Saudi leaders were beseeching him to defy Obama. They promised Mubarak unlimited financial support for Egypt if he agreed to cling to power.

    The US’s astounding sanguinity in the face of Morsy’s completion of the Islamization of Egypt is an illustration of everything that is wrong and dangerous about US Middle East policy today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.