Posted by Tina
On the issue of Barack Obama’s management of the so-called Syrian crisis, the American public seems split into two camps.
Half the country believes he’s lying.
The other half believes he doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about.
Is it possible both sides could be right?
Am I re-posting this to poke fun at the man in the big white house in Washington DC?
Yes…yes I am! Something has to be done to awaken our populace before the coming elections. Humor often does the trick.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhh, Chris is lurking in the shadows 🙂
Good one. Here’s another laugh before we cry.
Hilarious: Just How Bad Were the Senate Hearings on Syria?
http://www.ijreview.com/2013/09/77786-hilarious-just-bad-senate-hearings-syria/
Oh, wow I just watched that link you provided Peggy…there’s something wrong with that man. No kidding, I felt like he was having a nervous breakdown. What’s wrong with Kerry? He was confused, befuddle, illogical and mostly just embarassing. He was obviously not prepared. I thought he was trying to wing it and then he reverted back to his notes and it looked like he lost his place, or just flat out lost his notes and after that performance I think he possibly has lost his mind. That was pure babbling. Really sad…was this heavily edited or what??.
Hopefully, that tape for our sake was edited.
Here’s something else to put a smile on every conservatives face. We’re not alone in being called racist for speaking out against this president.
Obama’s Hollywood supports are keeping quiet because they’re afraid of being called racist says one of Obama’s biggest support Ed Asner.
Ed Asner: Hollywood Mum on Syria Over Fears of Appearing Racist:
Liberals in Hollywood are not speaking out against President Barack Obama’s call for military strikes against the Syrian government because they fear being called racists, veteran actor Ed Asner says.
“A lot of people don’t want to feel anti-black by being opposed to Obama,” Asner told The Hollywood Reporter.
But the fear of being labeled as racists is not the only reason actors aren’t mobilizing to protest potential action in Syria the way they protested the Iraq War, which began under Republican George W. Bush’s presidency, said Asner and fellow liberal activist Mike Farrell, of “M*A*S*H” fame.
And even though Hollywood isn’t organizing for protests against strikes in Syria, that doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of actors against a military strike, said the actors, who both admit they’re disappointed in the president they helped elect.”
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/asner-hollywood-syria-obama/2013/09/08/id/524400#ixzz2eP0EqKfm
Peggy…I thought that was a possibility, but then it seemed so well done. I hope it was heavily edited, but even if it wasn’t he still said those things edited or not. Obama has said much the same only smoother.
Who’da thunk that Clint Eastwood would become a prophet when he gave his “Empty Chair” routine?
Three letters ……..CIA
Wow. This Syria thing was a great example of American diplomacy. Russia worked out a deal and Syria agreed to it. Well done John Kerry.
Not.
The world is waiting to see just how serious Russia is and no trust is earned. All the speculations here? I guess now that Stria has admitted to having the chemical weapons the lie theory is debunked.
Now if we strike every diplomatic solution was examined.
Let us all hope Russia and Syria come through. None the less we have the knowledge that Syria has the weapons a far cry from the Iraq propaganda.
Hoping Russia and Syria will “come through”? What do you think will be accomplished?
George, According to the US Dept. of Defense chemical weapons including sarin were found in Iraq.
Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says:
By Samantha L. Quigley
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, June 29, 2006 – The 500 munitions discovered throughout Iraq since 2003 and discussed in a National Ground Intelligence Center report meet the criteria of weapons of mass destruction, the center’s commander said here today.
“These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes … they do constitute weapons of mass destruction,” Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.
The Chemical Weapons Convention is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. It was signed in 1993 and entered into force in 1997.
The munitions found contain sarin and mustard gases, Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said. Sarin attacks the neurological system and is potentially lethal.”
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918