The Clinton’s are a crooked bunch, but if not’s doing something illegal or unethical, its being incompetent… amazingly many democrats dismiss these criticisms as much ado about nothing. But, sometimes a story is so compelling, there’s no escape from the fallout. So, will this story finish Hillary?
From the Washington Post…
The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one. Full story click here
Credit must go to Peter Schweizer for his brilliant prerelease of his book by giving it to both left and right leaning mega media news sources. He literally said this is what I’ve found on my own, now use your resources to validate or disapprove my findings.
After reading the attached WP article I did find they attempted to keep Hillary detached from the Foundation even though her name is connected to it along with Bill’s and Chelsie’s.
Besides the possible financial gains the Clinton’s may have gained from the Foundation, after all if someone wanted to help a charity they could donate to it directly without going through a foundation, the thought that US uranium may end up in Iran’s nuclear bombs most disturbing.
Reports are disclosing the Clinton Foundation distributes 15% to charities, 85% goes to administrative cost and 60% of the 85% is recorded in a “other” account. Understand the books for the past 5-10 years are being changed to better reflect where the money came from and was spent for possible income tax errors.
No doubt the new AG Loretta Lynch will make this a priority, since Robert Menendez was indicted for far less allegations.
Tonight at 7pm Bret Baier will host a special, “Clinton Web” on FNC.
Nothing to see here folks. Move along.
Preview of Bret Baier’s special tonight.
Report: Companies With Ties to Clintons Profited After Haiti Quake:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/04/24/report-companies-with-ties-to-clintons-profited-after-haiti-quake/
Even the Demwits are beginning to question ShrilLIARy’s honesty after the email fiasco, the foreign donations to the Bubba foundation, and her sticky fingers all over her “pay for play” term as Sec State.
Anyone who would be so low as to steal furniture, artwork and other items from the white house after 2 terms does not deserve to be elected to ANY office.
While having sticky fingers with WH property, not belonging to the Clintons was bad, pimping out Lincoln’s bedroom was disgusting.
Looks like from the below article the Clintons of today haven’t changed one bit from when they were living in our WH.
NY Times Calls Clinton Selling Nights in the Lincoln Bedroom a Terry McAuliffe ‘Innovation’:
“On the front page of Sunday’s New York Times came the headline “In Virginia, I.O.U.’s Give The Democrat an Edge.” Democrats nearly always get an “edge” in liberal newspapers. In describing how Terry McAuliffe is cashing in all his favors for Bill and Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, reporters Trip Gabriel and Nicholas Confessore creatively employed the word “innovation” to describe McAuliffe’s shady idea to sell nights in the Lincoln Bedroom to Clinton donors: Mr. McAuliffe has gained front-runner status despite having to answer ethical questions arising from decades in politics and business — as old as his 1994 innovation of offering major campaign donors access to the president, which evolved into overnights in the Lincoln Bedroom, and as new as a federal investigation this year into whether he used political ties to benefit his troubled electric car company. Mr. Cuccinelli calls him “Tricky Terry” wherever he goes, but so far the label has not quite stuck. The Times reporters explained that McAuliffe had a close relationship with the Clintons: Mr. McAuliffe’s relationship with the Clintons is far more intimate than those typical of political moneymen. He shared cigars with Mr. Clinton on the Truman Balcony of the White House and played cards late at night with the president. Both families vacationed together. So it was no surprise that Mr. and Mrs. Clinton showed up as Mr. McAuliffe’s closers. Mrs. Clinton made her first public return to the political stage since stepping down as secretary of state to endorse Mr. McAuliffe at a rally in the Northern Virginia suburbs. “Terry has always been there for me, and I am pleased to be here for him,” she told the crowd. She may well expect him to be there for her again as governor if she runs for president in 2016. But they left out one September 1999 “innovation” designed to buy Hillary a house in New York so she could carpet-bag her way into the Senate. In their original home-financing plan, the Clintons would rely on a $1.35 million loan guarantee from McAuliffe. On the talk show “Inside Washington” at the time, longtime political reporter Jack Germond said “No other Senate candidate could do that and get away with it. If that were a Republican, we’d all be screaming in the press.” After they gave up on the scheme, the Times editorialized against it. Speaking of IOUs, the Clintons also signaled to potential McAuliffe challengers in this cycle they should butt out: Several Virginia Democrats said friends of Mr. McAuliffe helped persuade [former congressman Tom] Perriello not to run in a primary against him. One longtime Democrat, who declined to be identified while talking about private discussions, said it was made clear to Mr. Perriello that Mr. McAuliffe would have the strong backing of the Clintons. Mr. Perriello considered running but passed.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2013/11/05/ny-times-calls-clinton-selling-nights-lincoln-bedroom-terry-mcauliffe-in#sthash.t2UJFrq2.dpuf
Thanx, Peggy. I’d forgotten about the pimping the Lincoln bedroom issue.
We need a MUCH better class of people to occupy the white house. Both now and for the future!
Ditto J. Soden
I don’t think this story will kill Hillary Clinton’s bid for presidency. She and her team will do it all on their own.
#6 J. Soden,
As I see it the only way Clinton drops out is if Loretta Lynch calls for an investigation. With the investigation going on with Menendez and the other guys whose name I forget will be her first public test. If Holder was still there we know he’d never open an investigation.
I have to trust that enough of the voters not old enough to have lived through the first time the Clintons occupied the WH will learn about their true character and choose to not put a diehard socialist progressive in our Oval Office. But, if the voters believe Clinton is entitled to a life of luxury paid for by low-class minions who will willingly give what they have and have been brainwashed into believing it is required of them because of their lowly position and Clinton’s greatness I’m afraid she will be moving back in.
The great transformation that Obama has achieved is the ideology that now people work to support the powerful gov’t without question or challenge, instead of the gov’t serving at the will of the people.
I’m a big advocate for voter enforced term limits by telling everyone to not vote for a candidate who has been in office for more than 12 years. Both parties!
As usual In the case of the Clintons, and most recently from Hillary’s press release stating “NO SHRED OF EVIDENCE” which is nothing but a skilled diversion and roundabout nomenclature to distance one away from circumstantial evidence, such as appears to be the case with Uranium 1 deal
You could apply one of Saul Alinsky suggested uses; one “must be resilient, adaptable to shifting political circumstances, and sensitive enough to the process of action and reaction to avoid being trapped by their own tactics and forced to travel a road not of their choosing.”
But once more, what difference does it make now! Clintons have the money, Russia has a controlling interest in America’s future Uranium production, Iran has a friendly seller willing to supply Uranium to them and it’s all a continuing spiral of decline by Obama and his lack of concern for America’s best interest.
Bill Whittle nails Hillary.
THE CRIMINAL ARROGANCE OF HILLARY CLINTON:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lDN5b6ET0I
Clinton sleaze just keeps on keepin’ on —
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-04-29/clinton-foundation-failed-to-disclose-1-100-foreign-donations
Thanks Peggy, Whittle is always great.