by David Dubine
The Earth is about to begin a steep drop in global temperatures off its present global temperature plateau. This plateau has been caused by the absence of growth in global temperatures for 18 years, the start of global cooling in the atmosphere and the oceans, and the end of a short period of moderate solar heating from an unusually active secondary peak in solar cycle #24.
Average global atmospheric and oceanic temperatures will drop significantly beginning between 2015 and 2016 and will continue with only temporary reversals until they stabilize during a long cold temperature base lasting most of the 2030’s and 2040’s.
The bottom of the next global cold climate caused by a “solar hibernation” (a pronounced reduction in warming energy coming from the Sun) is expected to be reached by the year 2031.
The predicted temperature decline will continue for the next fifteen years and will likely be the steepest ever recorded in human history, discounting past short-duration volcanic events.
Global average temperatures during the 2030’s will reach a level of at least 1.5° C lower than today.
H/T to Ice Age Now for the video link
Below are links to an HTML listings of the references in the video:
◾Scientist List 1-8 http://spaceandscience.net/id4.html
◾Scientist List 9-15 http://spaceandscience.net/id66.html
The English major booby prize winner, left wing Lewinsky fool (yes I meant Lewinsky) who “debates” by character assassination while greedily staining his blue dress with mindless, blow-hard, brain=dead bimbo assertions remains wonderfully silent.
It can’t last. Enjoy the peace.
UK MET Office: Fastest decline in solar activity since the last ice age
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/06/24/uk-met-fastest-decline-solar-activity-last-ice-age/
Clearly these CAGW people have found a new hysteria to promote.
When Results Go Bad …
Anthony Watts / November 29, 2009
Guest post by Willis Eschenbach
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/when-results-go-bad/
Pie, if you enjoyed my absence from this site so much, why the hell was it so important for you to heap such absurdist vitriol on me in your very first comment?
Why are you so obsessed with me, on such an ugly and personal level?
Why can’t you debate the actual issues? I tried discussing the actual methodology of certain studies in the last thread on global warming. You wouldn’t say a word about that. And you’re going on about how I’m the one who engages via character assassination?
I feel sorry for you.
It isn’t character assassination to point out that a certain person or organization has no credibility. Every single person reading this has certain sources that they will not take seriously, sources that if linked to, they will automatically dismiss. For many here, it’s Media Matters or other left-wing sites.
I think most of this site’s visitors respect the views of global warming skeptics, and trust those sources. So it should behoove you to know that even among global warming skeptics, the “Space and Science Research Center” (which this article is from) is considered to be run by a scam artist:
“We think he’s a scam artist trying to get his hands in your pockets but couldn’t see how he expected to do so — now he’s told us. He’s looking for ‘meaningful funding’ and he thinks the skeptic community might be eager enough to slay the catastrophic warming myth to fork over some cash.
We’d like to think skeptics are not a good target for scammers hunting the gullible but with Al raking in cash with his fear campaign it was inevitable some crook would try to siphon some off with another ‘angle’. If you must give your hard-earned away bear in mind that JunkScience.com is always chronically short of funds.”
http://web.archive.org/web/20080112152529/http:/junkscience.com/blog/2008/01/08/must-have-brass-ones/
There is no “global cooling” and most climare skeptics don’t believe that there is. This was never a mainstream theory; certain journalists in the 70s misreported the science and thus was born the popular meme that “scientists used to believe in global cooling, how can we take them seriously now?” was born.
An actual climate scientist, Ben Kirtman, has debunked Casey’s claims:
“It looks to me that Casey is confused about global dimming, which actually seems to be in a reversal… As for the “global cooling” Casey is arguing for, all evidence is to the contrary. Indeed, ocean heat uptake has continued to steadily rise since the 1950s, and there is no plausible physical process (including changes in solar output) that would end this trend in the near-term (10-30 years). Casey’s “Summary Climate Assessment” has some unsupportable statements. For example, Casey’s assessment states that “Integrated Global Atmospheric Temperatures continue to show a long term COOLING trend that began in 2007. (100 year trend).” This is untrue (by far, 2001-10 is the warmest decade since the 1850s) and it is not mathematically possible detect a 100-year trend with seven years of data. The assessment goes on to state, “The rate of oceanic temperature decline has been slightly reduced over the past year but is expected to continue its long-term decline.” This is also untrue — July 2014 ocean temperatures are the warmest on record.”
Don’t believe everything you read.