By Jack
Is the ink dry on the Obama “peace in our time & no more nukes” agreement with Iran? No? well, I didn’t think so either, but guess what folks, the Iranians have already broke the deal. Does this surprise anyone outside the White House? And….and Iran just convicted an American journalist on phony spy charges. They have no fear and no respect for us, especially with Russian entering the Middle East.
Remember how Obama didn’t want to connect the US prisoners in Iran to this nuclear agreement, because he said it would be a distraction? He implied we had a side deal going to take care of this hostage situation. Well, we didn’t. And now that we’ve lost our leverage, no more sanctions, Iran is rubbing our nose in this agreement by convicting a hostage journalist of trumped up spy charges and by testing ballistic missiles. That missile test is a clear violation of Obama’s agreement and his press secretary has just admitted it.
by Andrew C. McCarthy October 13, 2015 5:02 PM
NATIONAL REVIEW: In its continuing humiliation of President Obama – who clings to his Iran deal despite Iran’s continuing to call for “Death to America,” banning of further negotiations with the U.S., convicting of one of its American hostages of bogus espionage charges, joining with Russia to prop up Assad by bombing America-backed insurgents, and contemptuously asserting that it will ignore provisions of the deal to which it objects – the jihadist regime in Tehran tested a ballistic missile over the weekend in blatant violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions, including Resolution 2231, which codifies the Iran deal.
The Obama White House response to Iran’s brazenness today is astonishing, even by delusional Obama standards. The president’s spokesman, Josh Earnest, acknowledged there were “strong indications that those missile tests did violate U.N. Security Council resolutions that pertain to Iran’s ballistic missile activities.” Nevertheless, he maintained with a straight face that “this is altogether separate from the nuclear agreement that Iran reached with the rest of the world.” What? The resolution that implements the said nuclear agreement directs Iran, for approximately the next eight years.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/425507/delusional-white-house-iran-missile-test-un-resolution-implementing-iran-deal
The circus continues. Makes me ill.
Me too. Stay healthy Tina. I need you and Jack. You have no idea how much.
SURPRISE SURPRISE! I can’t wait to hear from the “Netanyahu Cries Wolf”, Hillary’s, Obama’s and the Democrat Party’s butt boy Chris has to say. No doubt it will be profound.
Add to that Dewey and Libby.
(In the above I was being facetious.)
BiBi is a CIA hack
VIOLATION: “The Emad missile is able to strike targets with a high level of precision and carry a nuclear warhead. It can be guided all the way to its intended target, i.e. Israel.
This test violates the terms of Iran’s nuclear agreement with the United States and five other world powers.
As The New York Times reports, a resolution passed by the United Nations shortly after a deal was struck in Vienna specifies that Iran is not allowed to develop missiles “designed to carry nuclear warheads.”
Most of us remember how effective UN resolutions worked with Saddam. How many times did the UN issue stern resolutions to Iraq? I lost count. Now Iran is testing a long range missile with extreme accuracy, one that is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead. Of course they now have all the equipment necessary in their underground labs to make deadly fissionable material for any number of nuclear warheads. And what do we have? We have the assurance of a piece of paper, Obama’s UN resolution that they (Iran) just violated! OMG…this is nuts, will somebody please get that moron Obama out of our White House?!!!
The next president gets to deal with a new nuclear power run by a bunch of unstable religious zealots with a death wish…pray that it isn’t Joe Biden or Hillary.
It was at least seventeen (17) resolutions, maybe more.
The thing to take away from this, and everything else the UN and the Democrat Party are up to, is that laws only apply to those who aren’t on board with plans for a socialist new world order. Our Democrats will lie down with the worst of the worst if it furthers their dreams of nirvana. Disgusting.
Off Topic
Thieves, Liars and Idiots: The Two Hour Democratic Debate
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260451/thieves-liars-and-idiots-two-hour-democratic-daniel-greenfield
Great article. One of my favorite lines: “If you hated a man stealing all your money and taking away all your civil rights, get ready for some real political change now that a woman is going to do it.”
You know, if you lead off with a blatantly misleading misrepresentation, people aren’t gonna give you any credit for any marginally sensible thing you might say thereafter.
Don’t you know this?
The nuke agreement covers centrifuges and plutonium enrichment. Conventional weaponry is monitored otherwise, and their UN ambassador has already had an earful, I’m sure.
But think about it. Iran has to step up their missile development, so they can defend themselves against allied attacks!
Hee, hee.
What “allied attacks?” Libby is on LSD.
Apparently the administration doesn’t agree with Libby or even itself! Obama has spoken about nukes and this deal and he’s had at least two positions.
So, did Jack “lead off with a blatantly misleading misrepresentation?”
What exactly is “misleading” much less blatantly misleading, or a misrepresentation in his opening statement: “Is the ink dry on the Obama “peace in our time & no more nukes” agreement with Iran?”
We’d have to look at what Obama and Kerry have said and what their intentions have been to decide.
In April of 2010 Newsweek reminded us of Obama’s intent: