-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- Art (88)
- Behavior and Psychology (20)
- Business, Industry and Finance (63)
- Constitution and Law (370)
- Consumer Affairs (4)
- Culture (17)
- Deep State (5)
- Economy (3)
- Education (238)
- Environment (74)
- Fraud Alert (8)
- Global Issues (1)
- Health and Medicine (149)
- History (8)
- Humour (94)
- Military (115)
- Morals and Ethics (149)
- News Media (11)
- Police, Crime, Security (215)
- Politics and Government (144)
- Religion (91)
- Science and Technology (19)
- Veterans' Issues (13)
- World (12)
Recent Comments
- ClayPidgeon on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Michael Davis on Life In Chico and Other Places Infected by Bums
- Patricia Lieder on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Dawn on Thaddeus Kerns Boy Aviator
- scott sproat on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
Recent NorCal Blogs Posts
Whether you agree or not the simple fact they do not use those specific words is because that is what ISIS wants. To recruit fighters because the United States has declared war against Islam.
So while you think this Fox News crap is funny I find it un-American.
But then again if you take Fox Nation as to represent the United States as a whole then hey it’s true you are declaring a religious war to which many young people will die in to satisfy bigots at fox against the Black President.
But hey the banks are investing in banned cluster bombs I expect your breaking news on why we need to use them about NOV 2016.
The United States of America has never given rats butt what ruthless, diabolical terrorists “want!” We didn’t care what Hitler wanted either. We did what we had to do to end Hitler as swiftly as we possibly could…no weenie PC crap!
You need to review History not the one we were told the declassified one.
Re : “Whether you agree or not the simple fact they do not use those specific words is because that is what ISIS wants. To recruit fighters because the United States has declared war against Islam.”
Utter, unequivocal nonsense from the king of nonsense. Both you, Chris, and a few supposed national security “experts” are morons and are completely wrong. Policing the language in administration announcements and documents HAS HAD NO DISCERNIBLE EFFECT ON ISLAMIC TERRORISM. It has not kept them from feeling they are not legitimate, it has not had any effect on recruitment.
But you ****-for-brains progressive fools just keep on believing that it does. Whatever makes you comfortable in your happy-happy fantasy world.
America has suffered a terror attack every year under Obama
” Policing the language in administration announcements and documents HAS HAD NO DISCERNIBLE EFFECT ON ISLAMIC TERRORISM. It has not kept them from feeling they are not legitimate, it has not had any effect on recruitment.”
How could you possibly know that?
It it really quite obvious. No wonder you are in the dark. You never think. What ever little mental capacity you may have had has been thoroughly destroyed by progressive indoctrination and parroting progressive propaganda. I wonder if you will ever be able to think for yourself again. There are parrots more intelligent than you.
The simple and quite obvious fact is there is no evidence whatsoever that ISIS terror and recruiting activities have abated as a result of the administration policing language. In fact, they recruitment and terror activities by ISIS appear to be on the increase.
Get it, moron?
He bought a “U.”
A solid grasp of semantic inananity, I like that in a political movement.
Off Topic — Trump in the news …
This is hilarious —
Donald Trump calls her ‘Crooked Hillary,’ but his fans just say …
A sign Trump is doing something right —
Der Spiegel — Hillary must shield the world from Trump
(I love it when progressive Eurotrash get their panties in a bunch.)
Inside every progressive is a totalitarian screaming to get out.
Sehr gut, Pie!
It’s a funny cartoon, if you buy into the premise.
But as Libby says, it’s semantics.
Experts under both the Bush and Obama administration say that calling the terrorists “Islamic” gives them what they want, and helps them gain legitimacy among potential radicals. Saying that they are not “true Muslims,” while certainly engaging in the “no true Scotsman” fallacy, is a strategy meant to insult them and remove their legitimacy.
Why do you think you know more about how to fight ISIS than they do?
That is exactly it. The Intel is clear. Yet people do not care. They follow media for dollars.
After all never mention all the white American Men who have committed mass Murders here. look at those numbers.
Why do you keep on foolishly insisting this stupid, specious noise that purging language and avoiding insulting Islamic terrorist has any effect whatsoever on recruitment, nitwit?
Tina: Chris, the fact remains the President had language purged from national security manuals.
Piss Chris : Yes, for reasons I have explained ad nauseum, and which you refuse to address.
“Why do you keep on foolishly insisting this stupid, specious noise that purging language and avoiding insulting Islamic terrorist has any effect whatsoever on recruitment, nitwit?”
Because many radicals are recruited partially on the basis that they feel the West is against them and their religion. That’s a fact. Saying we are at war with “radical Islam” is used by ISIS as a propaganda tool to convince potential radicals that we are against Islam. That is also a fact.
These facts don’t go away just because you don’t want to hear them.
“Because many radicals are recruited partially on the basis that they feel the West is against them and their religion. That’s a fact.” Chris
Prove it. Show me this is a fact. Show me the data. You can’t just say its a fact without citing some source.
President of the United States said, “”Americans are asking, ‘Why do they hate us?’
“They hate what we see right here in this chamber, a democratically-elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms—our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.
“They want to overthrow existing governments in many Muslim countries, such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan. They want to drive Israel out of the Middle East. They want to drive Christians and Jews out of vast regions of Asia and Africa….With every atrocity, they hope that America grows fearful, retreating from the world and forsaking our friends. They stand against us, because we stand in their way.”
Jack, ISIS’ own magazine, Dabiq, talks often of eliminating the “gray zone” of moderate Muslims, insisting that Muslims cannot possibly live in peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims in the West, and that all true Muslims must eventually choose to follow the path of ISIS. They also tell Muslims that they are persecuted in the West. This is a major recruiting tool. When Western politicians suggest discriminatory policies, such as banning Muslim immigration, that absolutely furthers ISIS’ narrative and gives them further help in recruiting.
It is preposterous that you claim to be knowledgable about the threat when you don’t even know this.
Sources:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/12002726/The-grey-zone-How-Isis-wants-to-divide-the-world-into-Muslims-and-crusaders.html
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/17/islamic-states-goal-eliminating-the-grayzone-of-coexistence-between-muslims-and-the-west/
And you continue to stupidly believe that declaring that we are at war with radical Islam makes a damn bit of difference. The is no evidence whatsoever that ISIS uses any declaration of war on Islamic terrorists as a recruitment tool. There is no evidence whatsoever that the US policing language has any effect on radical Islam recruitment or terror activities. They don’t, period. Not in social media, not in web sites, not in videos.
Yes, the facts do not go away, idiot, you hear only what you want to hear.
Here is a challenge for you — find the evidence and present it. Otherwise, shut your yap and go take a long walk off a short pier.
Pie, I posted links which show lines from ISIS’ own propaganda that proves they do exactly that. And this is common knowledge in the intelligence community.
You don’t have to accept it, but don’t ask me to provide evidence I’ve already provided.
One of the two presidents you refer to had a strategy or defeating al Qaeda and had won that war…all that was needed was support for winning the peace and your guy failed spectacularly…I mean really, Chris, EPIC FAIL!.
While you piddle on with puffed up scorn about a handful of words you fail to admit the Middle East is on fire, the West is being inundated with refugees and terrorist fighters, and ISIS has gained in EGO and strength DESPITE Obama’s “careful” language. Somehow getting one decision made by Bush right and flunking out on all the others makes Obama a hero to you. May I suggest your bar for evaluating progressive presidents is much too low. And since when did you ever have a kind word to say about GWB? Quit trying to use him as Obama’s excuse!
“…many radicals are recruited partially on the basis that they feel the West is against them and their religion:
Big deal! Many Germans were recruited on the premise that they were part of a master race and everyone else should be purged, especially the Jews:
When such an enemy arises $&#% happens and many people get sucked into the evil. To lay recruitment at the feet of something as inconsequential as rhetoric is nonsense too ridiculous to fathom. This issue that you have made all consuming is minuscule compared to the hundreds of poor decisions, missed opportunities, and diplomatic failures that finds us in this dire situation.
Tina: “While you piddle on with puffed up scorn about a handful of word”
No. That is what you are doing. I am telling you that your obsession with these words is stupid and ignorant.
My god, your talent for projection is amazing. You’re able to revise history that happened two seconds ago.
“Big deal! Many Germans were recruited on the premise that they were part of a master race and everyone else should be purged, especially the Jews”
Yes, and thus it would not have been helpful for US politicians during that time to agree with them, would it?
Just as it is not helpful for US politicians to agree with ISIS that Islam and the West are fundamentally incompatible, as Trump has with his “temporarily ban Muslim immigration” plan.
You really cannot think.
“Somehow getting one decision made by Bush right”
Wait, what? Are you now agreeing with me that it was the right decision for Obama to follow Bush’s lead in avoiding the words “Islamic terrorism?” Or do you not even know what you’re saying anymore?
Fred Reed nails it—
http://fredoneverything.org/hussein-obama-50-america-0more-adventures-in-multiculturalism/
I didn’t care for the snipe at President Lincoln, which I think is wrong, but everything else is spot on.
Speaking of snipe, are not Chris, Dewey, Libby and “bob” the living embodiment of that verb?
Again look at the man in the mirror
Snerk
Drop dead Dopester. You bore me.
Read this.
http://www.libertylawsite.org/2016/06/17/thought-experiment-transcript-of-islamic-state-national-security-council-meeting-61616/#sthash.U8kM0355.uxfs&st_refDomain=t.co&st_refQuery=/od5no83wg8
ISIS’ strategy is to create a narrative of a war between Islam and the West. The phrase “Islamic terrorism,” proposing to temporarily ban Muslim immigration, and the general fearmongering about Muslims this blog has participated in over the past week plays right into their hands.
No. It does not make one whit of difference, you dope.
That is their whole strategy and recruiting tool IT IS THE WHOLE GAME
Not RW politics designed to win an election
You sit around playing word games and hating. What have you done for your country?
No it is not, you moron. Show me the evidence.
Pie, Google “gray zone.” You apparently haven’t heard of it. ISIS says in their own propaganda magazine that the West hates Islam, and that they are the only true “protectors” of Muslims in a world that hates and fears them.
If I were part of ISIS, I would definitely be using this blog to help convince potential recruits of this.
Of course ISIS says the west hates Islam. That has nothing to do with officially declaring war on Islamic terrorism. Sheesh, you are such a dope. Try and focus.
“If I were part of ISIS, I would definitely be using this blog to help convince potential recruits of this”
Of course you would, you are a moron.
“Of course ISIS says the west hates Islam. That has nothing to do with officially declaring war on Islamic terrorism.”
Yes, it does.
When the government reported on the threat of “right-wing extremism,” many on the right wing–including on this very blog–took that as a personal insult. You viewed it as the Obama administration declaring that *all* right-wingers were dangerous and possible terrorists, even though that’s not what anyone in the government said.
So why wouldn’t potential Muslim radicals feel the same way if the government declared war on “Islamic terrorism?”
You hope, Pie.
How many economically and sexually thwarted young men reside in Chico? A few, I imagine. You’re such a devout Republican, how about you head out to the Lions or the Mooses or the VFW and see what you can do about that.
Huh? Libby, have another drink and a toke on your bong.
Sigh.
You said your exhibitions don’t make a difference.
I said: “You hope.” … and suggested you find something constructive to do about it. (But I keep forgetting who I’m talking to.)
Red flags, sirens, alarms, bells and whistles, smoke signals, and pop-up alerts for terrorists/jihadists/thugs/criminals have all been disabled by the Obumble Politically Correct BS at the FBI and DHS. What’s left is the Department of Jerks “Good Feelings” Committee.
Chris: …many radicals are recruited partially on the basis that they feel the West is against them and their religion.
Tina: Big deal!
Me: Yes. It is a big deal. We are nasty little cultural imperialists, rampaging the globe foisting Coco Cola and Kojak re-runs on everybody. Some people don’t like it. They, like somebody else I could name, feel irrationally threatened and behave accordingly. You will deny it. But it’s still a factor in the mess.
Tina: Many Germans were recruited on the premise that they were part of a master race and everyone else should be purged, especially the Jews.
Me: What is this? Oh, I get it. The violent Jihadis are Nazis. It’s a fair comparison, I suppose, and a component in recruiting, but not the major one. You have to face it, Tina, if we had not over-thrown Egypt’s elected government 80 years ago, if Israel had not driven the Palestinians from their homes 60 years ago, if our Shah had not tried to turn them all into little Europeans 50 years ago, we would not be in this pickle right now.
And it is imperative that we figure out how to persuade them we’re not gonna do that sort of thing no more. They have a lovely culture (fingers crossed) and we won’t meddle no more.
I just thought. The German comparison goes further. Stomping Germany into the ground with the Versaillies Treaty spawned Hitler. Ripping Iraq pieces, after 80 years of other assorted imperialisms, spawned ISIS. And the both console themselves with that master race horsetucky.