New World Disorder – Disaster Case Number 29,162,311

by Jack

Seems like there is a flaw, uh, make that flaw’s, a lot of em, in Obama’s New Word Disorder. This time I’m dropping back to talk about the old problem of affordable quality healthcare. WHERE IS IT?

Obamacare was supposed to reduce the cost of health insurance and make it affordable to the poorest of us. The line was better healthcare, yet lower costs because he was reducing overhead and spreading out the costs among everyone. The democratic party says thats right! That’s what he did and we are so much better off today! But, that’s not true. If that were the case, why are so many people complaining about healthcare insurance costs? Even the doctors are complaining like never before! To hear the docs talk, it’s been a financial disaster for them – yet democrats will stand right in front of your face and boldly tell you how wonderful it is. Un-be-liev-able! And [liberals] are going to elect Hillary, the woman who screwed it up before Obama?

My family example: My daughter, a lowly CNA, going to school and working part-time still can’t afford health insurance. But, to add insult to injury, she now has to pay a penaty for something she can’t afford! She’s gone from having no health insurance, to paying a penalty for having no health insurance. This is Obama’s definition of progress?

The only way she can even come remotely close to paying for this new version of health insurance is if she has the bottom of the barrel coverage with a huge deductible. I’m talking about a $5000 deductible. She’s never spent anywhere close to that on medical bills in a one year period, so where’s the benefit? How is this affordable, quality health insurance? In her case, it’s worse than no insurance, because it costs more than paying the stupid tax penalty for not subscribing to Obamacare and she still gets no benefit for her monthly premium. This could only make sense to a liberal.

This entry was posted in Health and Medicine. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to New World Disorder – Disaster Case Number 29,162,311

  1. Harold says:

    “To anger a conservative, lie to him.

    To anger a liberal, tell him the truth”…

    – Teddy Roosevelt

    Based on the reply’s we get from Liberal posters about the real facts and consequences of happenings in America today, I would have to fully agree with Roosevelt’s quote.

    Todays Progressive liberal party just lie about anything, they want us to believe them and the facts be dammed (latest Big Zero lie, trying to sell us that we are safe in the world, Really ?, when people die on our soil, we are under attack, so another Obama BS statement!

    Obama and his administration is on SPIN cycle continuously, They just muck up everything they touch, from health care to national security, then they try to sell America on its merits (only realized by their own blindness to facts) using fact less spin with one lame excuse after another until the next anal act they pull out of their a$$ needs defending.

    If a change in America decline is to happen, voters need to give Trump the support to win the WH and straighten out the current cess pool in DC , as well as preventing Hillary from adding more stink to its rancid core.

  2. Libby says:

    “… she now has to pay a penaty for something she can’t afford!”

    First, if she worked for Kaiser, that socialist model of socialism, she would have coverage. She must spruce up the resume, and move to where they are … or unionize the employer she has. The SEIU will be pleased to take her call. You guys are all for “up by your own bootstraps” … this is how it’s done. You don’t work for employers that abuse you.

    Second, it’s not a penalty, it’s a tax, to offset whatever uninsured services she may require from the local hospital. One way or another, it has to be paid for. And if everyone were paying a tax to the government, rather than premiums to “for profit” insurers, then everyone would have coverage. I have yet to hear a anything but selfish, spoiled, greediness in opposition to this.

    • Tina says:

      What a completely asinine response! Kaiser cannot hire every person who’s been adversely affected by Obamacare. But thank you so much for illustrating the inane thinking of the average liberal/progressive.

      (There is nothing liberal or progressive about your policies…they take us backwards and are not open to ideas but instead “bound” to Marxist principles.

      ” You guys are all for “up by your own bootstraps” … this is how it’s done.”

      No nimrod, that is how it’s done in a system bound by Marxist principles. It leads to higher prices and increased misery every single time it’s tried. Case in point, GM over the last fifty years. Bankruptcy after bankruptcy because of unreasonable union demands, taxes, and onerous regulations that worked together to strangle the company.

      ” And if everyone were paying a tax to the government, rather than premiums to “for profit” insurers, then everyone would have coverage.”

      Thus creating a monopoly with a bureaucracy controlled by central planners leaving the individual zero options and at the effect of their government. THIS IS NOT FREEDOM OR EQUALITY! Guess who will continue to get premium healthcare? The wealthy elites of government and industry that will simply opt out using private docs and hospitals. The masses will have care that declines with waiting lists and restrictions on available care. See Huffington Post, ‘Free’ Health Care in Canada Costs More Than It’s Worth:

      Many Canadians and commentators in other countries lauding Canada’s government-dominated approach to health care refer to Canadian health care as “free.” If health care actually were free, the relatively poor performance of the health care system might not seem all that bad. But the reality is that the Canadian health care system is not free — in fact, Canadian families pay heavily for healthcare through the tax system. That high price paints the long wait times and lack of medical technologies in Canada in a very different light.

      In 2013, a typical Canadian family of four can expect to pay $11,320 for public health care insurance. For the average family of two parents with one child that bill will be $10,989, and for the average family of two adults (without children) the bill comes to $11,381. As a result of lower average incomes and differences in taxation, the bills are smaller for the average unattached individual ($3,780), for the average one-parent-one-child family ($3,905), and the average one-parent two-child family ($3,387). But no matter the family type, the bill is not small, much less free.

      And the bill is getting bigger over time. Before inflation, the cost of public health care insurance went up by 53.3 per cent over the last decade. That’s more than 1.5 times faster than the cost of shelter (34.2 per cent) and clothing (32.4 per cent), and more than twice as fast as the cost of food (23.4 per cent). It’s also nearly 1.5 times faster than the growth in average income over the decade (36.3 per cent).

      And what did these substantial funds buy?

      Despite talk of wait times reduction initiatives (backed with substantial funding), Canadians face longer wait times than their counterparts in other developed nations for emergency care, primary care, specialist consultations, and elective surgery. Access to physicians and medical technologies in Canada lags behind many other developed nations. And things have improved little since 2003. For example, the total wait time in 2012 (17.7 weeks from GP to treatment) is every bit as long it was back then.

      If Canada can create such a gigantic bureaucratic healthcare disaster you know America’s liberals can create an even bigger, more costly one! Why? Because none of them bother with cost to value, budgets, or even planning. Instead they “dream” of their ideal and then try to create it out of “hope and change.” They have no business sense, eschew profit as something stinky rather than necessary to move forward (progressive? Pfhtttt!).

      “I have yet to hear a anything but selfish, spoiled, greediness in opposition to this.”

      Yeah…because you are an ignorant closed minded dreamer! You imagine that we were able to go to the moon without profits creating the technologies and products necessary to get us there. You imagine cures for cancer, repaired limbs, and even cures for pneumonia without the profits needed for R&D, supplies, equipment, staff, buildings and expansion. You imagine hospitals and doctors that can perform miracles without compensation, profits, or growth…everything is possible in your world and it’s all free, wheeee!

      What a dope!

  3. Jim says:

    Only a $5,000 deductible? My insurance is $6K. You know what, I’m happy to have it. Because with out Obamacare the insurance companies wouldn’t even sell me insurance due to preexisting continuations. I’d be stuck with nothing.

    You are right, Obamacare is an expensive mess. However there is a simple and more affordable solution. It’s called single payer, or Medicare for everyone. Then charge everyone regardless of age a percentage of income to cover it. This would be simpler and less expensive.

    • Tina says:

      Because with out Obamacare the insurance companies wouldn’t even sell me insurance due to preexisting continuations. I’d be stuck with nothing.

      Jim that was one thing that everyone agreed needed changing. It’s incorrect to think that Obamacare is the only answer to the problem you faced.

      “This would be simpler and less expensive.”

      It would be a simple solution on paper. it is already a not so simple solution even for the seniors that already paid a high price for their own parents coverage and now face cuts to the program, new restrictions on service, and losses that add to our growing debt!

      Daily Signal:

      The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates Medicare’s total annual cost at $615 billion in 2015, and it is scheduled to exceed $1 trillion by 2023.

      In other words, over the next 75 years, American seniors are expecting tens of trillions of dollars of Medicare benefits that are not paid for. Today, working taxpayers, mostly through business and personal income taxes, fund an estimated 86 percent of the program’s annual cost. …

      … Fifty years later, in its July 22, 2015 memo to Senate Budget Committee staff, Medicare’s Office of the Actuary reports that Medicare’s debt—the program’s long-term unfunded liability—ranges from $27.9 to $36.8 trillion.

      Whether it’s the lower or higher debt number, this year’s estimates are worse than last year’s by more than a $1 trillion. …

      … Under Obamacare, the Medicare Trustees warn, “[b]y 2040, approximately half of hospitals, 70 percent of skilled nursing facilities and 90 percent of home health agencies would have negative total facility margins, ” adding that this creates the “possibility of access and quality of care issues for Medicare beneficiaries.”

      The idea that we should double down on a system that is creating massive debt and burdening young people is crazy.

      In no other area would anyone suggest building on top of a crumbling system! Healthcare is a emotional, personal issue, common sense goes out the window. It seems to flow from an irrational loathing of profits, the very thing that makes innovation, extension and growth, more jobs, higher wages, and yes, superior care possible.

      We can make reforms that will address problems such as pre-existing conditions without destroying what has been a working healthcare system, without breaking personal budgets and without the one size fits all mentality that limits rather than expands choices.

  4. Tina says:

    Jack the failures of Obamacare, a system forced on the American public through trickery and deceit, are mounting daily:

    Newsmax:

    The goals that President Barack Obama spelled out for his signature healthcare overhaul are nowhere near being achieved five years into its lifespan — time enough to recognize, as most Americans do, that the law needs to be scrapped and replaced, says a health policy analyst and writer.

    “The American people are not happy on this birthday,” Sally Pipes, president and CEO of the Pacific Research Institute, told “MidPoint” host Ed Berliner on Newsmax TV on Monday.

    Pipes said the Affordable Care Act, which turned 5 on Monday, has meant rising premiums for policyholders, fewer choices in insurer-shrunken networks of medical providers, new Medicaid enrollees struggling to find doctors at all, and a ballooning of the country’s healthcare tab.

    The primary Obamacare goals of universal coverage and lowered costs are unreachable under the existing plan, said Pipes.

    “The Congressional Budget Office has said by 2025, 25 million Americans will still be uninsured,” she said. “The president wanted a healthcare bill that cost $900 billion over 10 years. The CBO costed it out at $940 billion. Now, the gross cost is about $1.7 trillion from 2015 to 2024.

    We at Post Scripts warned people that the projected figures would be wrong…and they are dramatically wrong! But it’s not just about money:

    While the percentage of people counted as uninsured has fallen, the picture is more complicated, said Pipes

    “The administration has come out and said about 8.8 million people, as of the beginning of March, are now covered under HealthCare.gov,” she said, “But it’s also being pointed out that about 20 percent of those people … will probably not pay the premium.”

    Among an estimated 11 million new Medicaid enrollees, “we’re finding increasingly that people on Medicaid cannot find a doctor,” said Pipes. “So, we’ve seen emergency room use go up, which is expensive, which the president promised would not happen.”

    “If you can’t find a doctor and you have coverage, but you can’t get a doctor, what does that mean?” she said. “It means we’re headed down a path to rationed care and lack of access with long waiting lists.”

    It gets worse:

    The Affordable Care act is having a devastating impact on already strapped rural hospitals, playing a role in many of them shutting their doors, The Washington Post reports.

    Forty-eight rural hospitals have closed since 2010 and 283 are in danger, the Post quotes the National Rural Health Association as saying. Most of the shuttered hospitals are in the South.
    Other factors are contributing to the problem, but Obamacare is cited as the main reason. The law reduced Medicare payments and how much hospitals are paid for uninsured patients.

    More problems…collapsing Obamacare exchanges. When you eschew profits you end up with losses and that leads to failure, fewer choices, and higher prices for consumers!

    Obamacare’s exchanges could soon be out of health insurers.

    This month, UnitedHealth – the largest U.S. insurer — announced that it would no longer sell exchange plans in New Jersey in 2017. It has now withdrawn from 27 states. Last year, UnitedHealth lost about $475 million on the exchanges; this year, it’s projecting $500 million in losses.

    The story is similar for other insurers. Many have decided to abandon markets they have long served. That’s left people fewer options for coverage. And with less competition on the exchanges, the plans that remain have more freedom to hike premiums. …

    …Thirteen of Obamacare’s 23 state-sponsored CO-OP health plans have failed. Consequently, no less than 740,000 people have had to scramble to find new coverage.

    Folks in Alabama and Alaska had access to at least seven insurers before Obamacare. Next year, they’ll have just one. The same will happen for those living in many parts of Arizona, Kentucky, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.

    Insurers that have remained on the exchanges are pushing for double-digit premium hikes. Former Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services chief Marilyn Tavenner, who now heads insurer trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans, recently said that premiums in 2017 will likely be higher than in 2016.

    Sally Pipes, in the Forbes article, makes the following observation: It takes a special kind of reasoning to respond to the spectacular failure of government that is Obamacare by calling for, well, even more government.

    Yeah, “Special!”

  5. Pie Guevara says:

    Re Harold …

    “To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.” attributed to Teddy Roosevelt.

    Actually Teddy Roosevelt never said that. At least there is no evidence he ever said that. But if you want to credit me, I’ll accept that honor.

  6. Pie Guevara says:

    When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer ‘Present’ or ‘Not guilty.’

    Theodore Roosevelt

  7. Pie Guevara says:

    Remember when liberals and Democrats called anyone who criticized Obama a racist? My Rat neighbors tried to pull that crap on me. I threw it back in their faces.

    “To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

    ― Theodore Roosevelt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.