Posted by Tina
DNC emails hacked from their server have been released for public view. Dubbed the “Hillary Leaks Series” this batch is apparently only the beginning in what will be a constant barrage from now to November. The Conservative Treehouse found information among the 19-20 thousand emails indicated collusion with the media:
Earlier today WikiLeaks released more documents showing how the Democrat National Committee (DNC) specifically worked to destroy the candidacy of Bernie Sanders in a united effort with the media to support Hillary Clinton.
The revelations within the release are quite astounding, and unfortunately confirm all the prior suspicions of the Bernie Sanders supporters about the democrat party apparatus working with the Clinton campaign to eliminate the threat posed by Senator Sanders.
There are multiple examples of specific activity where the DNC is colluding with the media to undermine Sanders. A few examples are below, and we’ll dig in to some of those stories later. However, within one part of the email release there’s another angle confirming something we have covered here exhaustively.
The DNC actually working with CBS News to construct the specific wording of how poll data should be presented to the CBS News audience. (see copies at link)
This type of collusion is what we’ve previously outlined and labeled “Media Agenda-Polls”. In the example above it was/is CBS News allowing the DNC to write the script. However, we’ve previously shared numerous examples of NBC/WSJ polls which showed clear evidence of the same arrangements.
Pollster Mark Murray (NBC) is notorious for capturing and then promoting agenda poll data. Throughout the primary season all of NBC’s polls were specifically intended to prop up Hillary Clinton and detract from Bernie Sanders. Mark Murray does the same thing with NBC/WSJ polling for Clinton -v- Trump comparisons.
The DNC also worked with the media before and during the RNC convention:
The weekend prior to the RNC Convention, NBC releases polls supporting Hillary Clinton. The Monday the convention begins, Monmouth releases polling doing exactly the same thing.
Both the NBC Polling (M Murray) and the Monmouth polling (P Murray) were agenda polls (just like all prior releases); their polls were also fundamentally disconnected from scientific Rasmussen polling released only a few days earlier. (see chart)
The emails also show how the DNC worked against Bernie Sandrs in a rigged election process. AP:
WASHINGTON (AP) — A cache of more than 19,000 emails from Democratic party officials, leaked in advance of Hillary Clinton’s nomination at the party’s convention next week in Philadelphia, details the acrimonious split between the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s former rival, Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Several emails posted by Wikileaks on its document disclosure website show DNC officials scoffing at Sanders and his supporters and in one instance, questioning his commitment to his Jewish religion. Some emails also show DNC and White House officials mulling whether to invite guests with controversial backgrounds to Democratic party events.
Looks like Bernie had good reason to question a system rigged against him. His supporters should be more than angry today.
We’ve always known the Democrat party and the media had a corrupt relationship. These leaked emails offer proof.
Clinton and her party should not be rewarded with wins in November.
That’s right. Be manipulated by Pooty … because it suits your prejudices to do so.
And your astonishment is astonishing. You can’t really think that the honchos on your side do not have the networks on speed dial? I mean, come on.
The funniest (or least funny) is that Hillary managed to compromise national security, lie to Benghazi victim families (and then attack them), delete 3000 or more emails from her idiotic personal server used for sensitive and secured data, lie to congress and the FBI, and get away with it — BUT COULD NOT SUPPRESS THIS INTERNAL PARTY MESSAGING.
The Clinton/Rat machine may not be as well oiled as it appears to be.
Off Topic
Food for thought …
“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” — Richard Feynman
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/07/23/a-response-to-abcs-media-watchs-shoot-the-coral-messenger-flimflam/
The earth replenishes, adapts, and renews. Beginning, middle, end. Birth, life death. It’s all part of the cycle. I love this from the article:
Good article Pie. Is it not wonderful to see responsible, ethical scientists pushing back?
Yes, that is good to see, but it depresses me to no end that “scientists” who DO NOT follow the method and have a political agenda and axe to grind wield so much influence and power.
I agree. Think of the time and effort to keep this lie alive and in the public eye…had to be very lucrative.
I don’t know when the tipping point will come but the push back is gaining in strength. People are fed up with high energy prices and taxes that line the pockets of the elites. We’re less and less moved by extreme stories whose dates come and go.
I read just the other day about another excursion to prove global warming that was stuck due to sea ice.
How ironic that the DNC is now scrambling and looking for the source of their “leaks” and still giving $hrilLIARy a pass on her email fiasco.
Will be interesting to hear if Bernie has anything to say about the conspiracy to deny him votes in the speech he’s scheduled to give on Monday.
Whomever found the emails did the country a great service! Keep looking, whoever you are! Hopefully next to be exposed will be the voter fraud the Demwits have planned for November.
Poor Libby is irrelevant to her own party and ideology.
More on Convention:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/24/dnc-reveals-2-5-short-paying-convention/
Landlords and other professionals (printers, limo service, etc) had better get their $$ up front as the Demwits have a long history of stiffing businesses during prezidential campaigns.
Nothing in the hacked emails is as embarrassing for Democrats as what Trump says and does every day. The other day he once again defended linking Rafael Cruz to JFK’s killer, falsely claiming no one had disputed Cruz was in the picture (Rafael has said he wasn’t even in the state at that time) and saying the National Enquirer should have won a Pulitzer. Part of the job of president is to look at different sources of information and decide which to believe, and you think Trump is up for the job when he is this misinformed? You want someone so petty he can’t stop bashing the guys from the primary when he already won against them? If this is how he treats Cruz how will he treat our allies? Oh wait, he already said he wouldn’t support NATO so we have our answer to that.
I remember another loud strongman who campaigned on getting rid of immigrants and religious groups, and swore he would break treaties he didn’t like. How’d that turn out?
I’d rather have a candidate picked by the DNC than one picked by Putin and David Duke.
“Part of the job of president is to look at different sources of information and decide which to believe, and you think Trump is up for the job when he is this misinformed?”
Roger (Chris?), the Enquirer has broken several very big scandals: Monica’s blue dress, John Edwards honey on the side and love child…
Plenty of false narratives have been aimed at Trump in this election too. He’s had 16 rivals, both Hillary and Bernie, and media of all stripes take aim at him. Do you think he should sit back and take it?
This is an election. It will be down and dirty like never before. Are you so naive as to think he is “misinformed” rather than playing the game as established by the political classes long before he got into it?
“…he already said he wouldn’t support NATO so we have our answer to that.”
Do we? Or do we have a man who has realized NATO, an alliance formed after WWII when Europe was decimated by war, is outdated and has made comments informing our allies that the terms of NATO need to be reformed to reflect modern day Europe, the current very different threats we face, and the fact that Turkey has now taken a path away from secular democracy. I would call the man shrewd, well informed, and well in touch with exert advisors.
Hillary, who changes positions as often as she changes her designer clothing, is politician through and through! The people are looking for new leadership from someone not entangled in the “DC Club.”
“I’d rather have a candidate picked by the DNC than one picked by Putin and David Duke.”
Dog whistle! (You’re caapable of campaign BS too!)
You’d rather have a criminal, and liar, who is largely responsible, along with Obama and Kerry, for the rise of ISIS, destruction and mayhem across the globe, and Iran on the path to nuclear warhead capability? You’d rather elect a woman who sold American uranium rights to Putin so he could supply North Korea and Iran?
All I can do is shake my head. The current administration is responsible for everything you thought you hated under Bush AND SO MUCH MORE! And you choose to continue down that path. Incredible!
“You’d rather elect a woman who sold American uranium rights to Putin so he could supply North Korea and Iran?”
She did not do this. Stop lying!
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-veto-power-for-clinton-on-uranium-deal/
You are also wrong about the cause of ISIS, which grew out of the power vacuum created in Iraq by GWB. The troops were withdrawn under Bush’s timetable–Obama tried to keep them there but couldn’t.
You are wrong about the Iran deal which weakened their ability to develop nukes.
You’re wrong that Trump relies on respected experts. Republicans have been very vocal that Trump’s team is made up of nobodies. General Flynn today retweeted Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda. But sure, these guys are geniuses.
You’re wrong to call Clinton a criminal and ignore Trump’s long record of bribing judges, using his organization to fund his campaign and vice versa, fraud, scams, and frivolous lawsuits.
You’re wrong to suggest that this election is just like any other, or that Trump’s behavior is no dirtier than any other politician. NONE of the other Republican candidates have behaved the way he has, nor has any Democrat. When has any other presidential candidate accused a rival’s father of helping assassinate a former president? That’s crazy.
This is a guy who began his political career by investigating Obama’s birth certificate. He promised he was going to find something huge, something we wouldn’t believe. That’s how he talks. What did he find? Nothing. Right from the beginning he was breaking his promises and you expect him to keep them as president? Right from the beginning he was wasting time chasing baseless conspiracy theories and believing stupid lies, instead of focusing on what mattered to Americans, and you expect him to make rational decisions as president?
Can you imagine if Trump runs his presidency like he has run his campaign? He’ll continue praising our enemies and insulting our allies. He is incompetent and completely unqualified. He would be the first president ever to have no experience in government or military. On top of that he is an intemperate moron. He has said he doesn’t read books. He has said he will order the military to follow illegal orders such as torture and murder of civilians. He has said he will use the law to go after journalists who report negative things about him. His long history of suing anyone who talks bad about him proves that. And none of this scares you? You are so deluded by your hate for Hillary you can’t see clearly. Trump is a far greater danger to our constitution and our nation.
NYT:
The New York Times is hardly a bastion of conservative thought. In fact it is a well known leftist paper.
Obama tried to keep troops in Iraq but couldn’t? Oh, poor baaby.
Perhaps he couldn’t because he called it a stupid war and abandoned the country. After all of the blood and treasure we spent his position was strong and we were seen as the strong horse in the region. Obama blew both the image and the chance to remain and keep the whole region stable. His actions in Libya, Syria, Egypt, Iran and Afghanistan have made a huge mess and after eight years of this abject incompetence and weakness this is Obama’s and Hillary’s mess.
You’ve called me a liar. I suggest you back the he77 off.
Dog whistle nothing! It’s a plain statement of personal preference.
“Make America America again!” … this is a dog whistle.
Personal preference that includes a dog whistle…David Duke is about as influential in republican or conservative politics as my cat.
“Make America America Again” is a slogan. It’s a whole lot better than “hope and change” was or “We Are Stronger Together” is.
Did you hear Obama’s brother is supportig Trump
And did you hear about that embarrassing moment on the ABC Sunday morning show when Keith Ellison had his facts wrong:
It should be a fun week.