So here’s the REAL story. Amb. Stevens was sent to Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission.
Hillary brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Then some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan used against our own military. It was July 25th, 2012 when a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of our own Stingers, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but had to land anyway.
An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were now in full panic mode and Stevens was sent in to retrieve the rest of the Stingers. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams.
It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to our sworn enemies, because Petraeus wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he OK’d the BS talking points about a spontaneous uprising due to a Youtube video.
Obama and Hillary committed treason…and THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was because of a You Tube video, even though everyone knew it was not. Further…the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval when Boehner created the Select Cmte, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for the release of 5 Taliban Generals.
Bowe Bergdahl was just a pawn…everyone KNEW he was a traitor.
So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised…and a woman that is a serial liar, perjured herself multiple times at the Hearing whom is running for POTUS. Only the Dems, with their hands out, palms up, will support her. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft was called in…because the administration knew our enemies had Stingers:
Here’s a possible connected story from the Washington correspondent for the Daily Mail:
Four hundred American surface-to-air missiles were ‘taken from Libya’ during the terror attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, a former U.S. Attorney who represents whistleblowers claimed on Monday.
He added that the U.S. intelligence community is terrified they might be used to shoot down airliners.
Joe diGenova, whose wife Victoria Toensing – a former deputy assistant attorney general – also represents Benghazi witnesses and others with knowledge of the terror attack, told WMAL radio that the loss of those missiles is also one the reason the U.S. State Department shut down 19 embassies across the Middle East last week.
‘A lot of people have come forward to share information with us,’ he said during the radio station’s ‘Mornings On The Mall’ program Monday morning.
‘We have learned that one of the reasons the administration is so deeply concerned’ is that ‘there were 400 surface-to-air missiles stolen, and that they are … in the hands of many people, and that the biggest fear in the U.S. intelligence community is that one of these missiles will be used to shoot down an airliner. 400 missiles, surface-to-air missiles, taken from Libya.’
Asked if the missiles are now ‘in the hands of al-Qaeda operatives,’ DiGenova replied, ‘That is what these people are telling us.’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2390642/400-surface-air-missiles-STOLEN-Libya-Benghazi-attack-says-whistle-blowers-attorney.html#ixzz4NyC7XJMA
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the
permalink.
This story is from August 2013. The writers have had three years to prove the conspiracy theories you’ve laid out here. Not only have they failed to do so, but many of their claims have been totally disproven–for example, every single Congressional investigation into Benghazi has found there was not a single “stand down order” ever given that night, and yet you are still claiming there were many. There was also tons of evidence that the anti-Islam video did play a role in the attack–the attackers said so themselves!
The National Review debunked this story years ago:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/349231/stingers-benghazi-jim-geraghty
https://www.truthorfiction.com/clinton-sent-ambassador-stevens-benghazi-retrieve-stinger-missiles/
I find it interesting you accuse Obama and Clinton of “treason” for allegedly selling weapons to terrorists. Do you apply the same term to Reagan, who was proven to have done so?
The National Review article does not “debunk” the charge, in fact it states that some of the evidence supports the charge. Given any nations propensity for secrecy of covert ops, this administration’s patter of failure (Iraq, Libya, Syria,Egypt), and this administrations pattern to deny, deny, deny, I’d weight the report as likely true.
One example of evidence in support of charge:
In terms of labeling any administration “traitorous” it would depend of the administrations intent and goals. We know Reagan was arming people fighting for their freedom against oppressive, dangerous elements. The same can’t be said for Obama! He seems always to work against the interests of the US, our allies, and freedom loving people everywhere. He seems always to work in ways that empower our enemies and radical elements both here and abroad.
The NY Post has a photos atop their 2014 story, “How the Taliban got their hands on modern US missiles”
Regarding downed Chinook helicopter:
One thing that cannot be denied, the Obama administration, including Hillary’s work at state, is a complete failure in terms of ridding the world of the terrorist threat (rise and spread of ISIS) and the evil (increased brutal attacks) it spreads.
Terror attack have increased here and in Europe and in the ME ISIS has shown itself to be more brutal than it’s predecessor al Qaeda. 50 Wire reported Saturday:
The world has been plagued by this type of evil scourge many times before, what is it that prevents the left from mounting a determined effort against it? A sick (mentally defective need) to be friends with everyone perhaps?
We are the world…we are the children…
Yeah, right.
“I’d weight the report as likely true.”
Your article (or rather, the article that this one is plagiarized from) said that this was “the REAL story.” See the all-caps there? That’s there to make people who can’t think believe it must be true. It was irresponsible of your blog to publish this story as the “REAL” one when you don’t know that it’s real. It was also irresponsible to plagiarize. It was also irresponsible to declare this a “revelation” when every single claim within it is three years old.
That’s three strikes.
“We know Reagan was arming people fighting for their freedom against oppressive, dangerous elements.”
He was literally arming terrorists, but OK, sure, whatever helps you sleep at night.
“The same can’t be said for Obama!”
Then why on earth do you think President Obama was arming terrorists? Just for the fun of it?
“He seems always to work against the interests of the US, our allies, and freedom loving people everywhere. He seems always to work in ways that empower our enemies and radical elements both here and abroad.”
Nuts. Absolutely nuts.
“The world has been plagued by this type of evil scourge many times before, what is it that prevents the left from mounting a determined effort against it?”
President Obama absolutely has “mounted a determined effort” against ISIS. The only thing stopping you from seeing that is your own prejudice.
Lately there’s been a lot in the news about a determined effort by Obama…it’s an election year.
That doesn’t erase seven and a half years of utter failure in waging war, appeasement of terrorist supporters, making private deals with sponsors of terror, and turning his back on allies.
Tommy: One big difference was that Reagan did not directly sell weapons to enemies. Israel sold Iran OLD spare parts which we then replaced with NEW ones. This was done to raise money for the Contras in Nicaragua to fight the Commies trying to forcefully take over that country despite losing an election there, badly. We were asked for help and we gave it to them. But Senate Liberals couldn’t have this so they cut off the funding, which forced Reagan’s people to these extremes. I fail to see where any of this endangered America or any of it’s citizens. Obama’s deal was quite different all around. Pure and simple aiding and abetting our enemies. The deal was meant to bring down Ghadaffi and at this point he was cooperating with us and giving us good intel on terrorist activities. Why would you want to stop that? (That’s a real question, Tommy!)
Anthony thank you for posting a very informative comment to Post Scripts.
Unfortunately we haven’t heard from Tommy again to my knowledge, so I doubt your question will receive an answer.
Be assured we appreciate the information you’ve provided.
I go back and forth: dangerous or ridiculous? … ridiculous or dangerous?
Today, it’s definitely ridiculous.
I just love that a three-year old story is headlined “Revelation!” Ridiculous, indeed.
It’s relevant regardless of age right now: 1. Not everyone keeps up with news, 2. The information is germane in terms of Hillary Clinton’s worthiness (NOT) to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
Hey ****head Tommy = Chris = Rat troll, The Revelations of John are ~ 2000 years old. I suppose if someone quoted that you would be making the same asinine accusations of plagiarism and being old news.
Revelations? That decidedly disturbed wet dream? Really, Pie. For what possible reason might such a comparison be apt?
You, of course, miss the point entirely, genius.
In consequence of that transparent evasion, I must conclude you have no answer.
In my opinion it’s quite clear that this administration is both ridiculous and dangerous and the evidence is their denial about the absolute disaster and failure of the Obama administrations diplomatic and war policies!
You’re entitled to whatever “opinion” you want to hold, but this article passed off opinion as facts (“the REAL story!”). You are not entitled to your own facts.
In my opinion, it’s way too clear that you will fall for any little bit of pre-election horsepucky that feeds your prejudices … and that’s the sort of thing that will kill a republic.
Also ridiculous: this entire article is plagiarized from someone else.
http://www.livetradingnews.com/wikileaks-exposes-hillary-clintons-benghazi-crimes-19002.html#.WA5csS0rLcs
Do you always try to pass off other people’s work as your own, Post Scripts? I guess if you can’t be bothered to fact-check your stories, why would you bother to write them yourselves either?
The article has been re-posted by others. It’s been common on the internet. Jack did not affix his name to the article or claim credit for it. I doubt you could make the case for plagiarism…it’s more like passing a newspaper article to a neighbor across the fence.
This blog is designed as a platform for discussion of things in the news. Most of the time we provide a link or other attribution. It could have been an oversight for all I know.
One thing that hasn’t changed is your nasty vindictive nature…I think we’re done…again!
Tommy sounds a lot like a paid troll.
Bingo.
I disagree J and RHT. Tommy = Chris is not bright enough to get paid for being a troll. Can you imagine what his students think of him? His classroom must be a radical left hellhole.
Point taken. However, I would argue that intelligence is not a requirement, one just needs to be a useful idiot. As for his classroom–radical left I’m sure–despite his declarations to the contrary. Hellhole? For you or me, certainly. For his students, probably not so much. That is the wonderful thing for the left about our dumbed-down education system. Students can be handed a $–t sandwich and they will take it because they have nerve been taught anything to compare it to.
Here’s a story that involves the missing Benghazi emails that hit the wires this morning and broke by Reuters and the Wall Street Journal:
Today, it’s been revealed that Terry McCauliff, Bill Clinton’s former Finance Campaign Manager and now Governor of Virgina had his Super Pac donate over $500,000 to Doug McCade’s wife who was running for a State Senatorial office. She won, The donation was made the day after the Congress subpoenaed Hillary Clinton’s emails. Why does this matter? Because FBI Deputy Director Doug McCade was promoted and put in charge as the newly promoted FBI Assistant Director and directed to oversee the Hillary FBI investigation. Talk about corruption!!! Now we know why Hillary Clinton bragged from the beginning that there would never be a criminal indictment made against her. She knew the fix was in and placed by McCauliff’s Super Pac donation to benefit McCade’s wife. Every Democrat that votes for Hillary is aiding and abetting a felon!!! But don’t worry, the Democrat’s low information voters don’t even know how to spell the word felon! And for those that can spell, they are still working on their High School GED diploma.
McCauliff…now there’s a piece of slime.
He has a long history of corruption going back prior to Bill Clinton’s term. Note the article is in Mother Jones.
His association with Garry Winnick cost me when Global Crossing blew up ($54 billion in shareholder losses). More here and here.
Tommy = Chris
False accusations, bald faced lying, nitpicking over words. The usual half-baked, left-wing, anal-retentive attack crap that is signature Chris. Each time he is caught in a lie or making false, inaccurate, or exaggerated accusations he pivots and escalates. He huffs and puffs and then Looney Libby chimes in. The poor kid has no life, he is owned by Post Scripts. I suspect that without Post Scripts he has no life and that being banned has made him very angry and frustrated.
I can easily imagine how self-righteously livid he was when he read this entry. He must have been beside himself with righteous indignation. Kinda funny, when you think about it.
If this signals the return of Chris, then let him use his former handle. It won’t be long before he starts calling everyone who is not a left-wing jerk like him a narrow minded, delusional bigot, racist, misogynist, xenophobe, et cetera, et cetera ad nauseam.
Isn’t the snot from Libtard “it’s way too clear that you will fall for any little bit of pre-election horsepucky that feeds your prejudices” Libby enough?
Notable Quote
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
ATTN JACK AND TINA
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/10/25/true-vote-offers-smartphone-app-report-voter-fraud/
Be sure to read the comments at the end of the article. Have already voted absentee, but will check out the app anyway. Now, all we need is an app to keep track of $hrilLIARy’s – and Obumble’s – lies!
Re RHT447 “I would argue that intelligence is not a requirement, one just needs to be a useful idiot.”
I stand corrected.
Hmmm…missed this before…
Tommy, your Live Trading News article by Paul Ebeling is dated, October 17, 2016
Jacks link to a Daily Mail article by David Martosko in Washington was first published on 12 August 2013 and then updated 13 August 2013. You noted that in your first comment.
So your charge, that “this entire article is plagiarized from someone else, Paul Ebeling, is incorrect. Your motive?