Wisconsin Recount ~ Trump Count Up

Posted by Tina

Five days in and more than a million votes recounted finds Trump up by 26 votes in Wisconsin (See chart):

The Wisconsin Election Commission posts daily recount results. Wisconsin has until December 13 to complete the recount. The Day 5 spreadsheet shows that many counties, including populous ones, are nowhere near completing their recounts. The Electoral College meets on December 19. The Day 5 results contain all of the previous days’ tallies also. Green Party candidate Jill Stein paid $3.5 million for the Wisconsin recount, alleging unproven fraud.

Talk about a waste of time and money!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Wisconsin Recount ~ Trump Count Up

    • Tina says:

      The Democrat Party, and some of the greenies, continue to look ignorant and slimy. I don’t think they’re making many points with the portion of their former base that were disgusted and left. Corruption, wasting money, waging war without a plan are not winning traits…now they add shenanigans at the polls and being sore losers to the list?

      Deplorable!

  1. Harold says:

    Update by Heavy shows that Hillary is now gained on Trump and now leads by 2 votes. So far not much difference from original count.

    Heavy also reports there is a lot of problems in Michigan:

    The Michigan recount finished its first day, and there were already reports that half of Detroit’s votes might not be recounted, as well as other problems with ballots.

    The reason so many Detroit ballots could get left out of the recount: The number of ballots listed in poll books is not the same as the totals given on machine printouts.

    Clinton rang up huge margins in Wayne County, home to populous Detroit, and she would likely need her margin there to grow in order to shrink Trump’s 10,704 vote margin in Michigan. Clinton received 66 percent of the Wayne County vote on November 8.
    “The news of the Detroit problems broke in the Detroit News on December 5 as two Michigan counties started recounting ballots from the 2016 presidential election. The newspaper reported that “one-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified” from the recount because of ballot problems. According to the newspaper, officials “couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts” during last month’s countywide canvass of Election Day returns, adding that most are in Clinton stronghold Detroit, “where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.”

    The Detroit Free Press quoted an expert who questioned the Michigan recount law, which varies from other states in that, if there is a discrepancy between the number of ballots and those listed in poll books, a recount can not be done in that precinct, and original results stand if the “difference is not explained to the satisfaction of the board of canvassers.”

  2. No Longer Deplorable J Soden says:

    Off topic, but some prime reading suggestions:
    http://www.southflorida.com/theater-and-arts/sfl-best-mystery-novels-of-2016-20161206-photogallery.html
    Have read C.J. Box’s “Off The Grid” mentioned there and is worth the read. (For more of Joe Pickett, check your library or ebook)

  3. Peggy says:

    Off Topic

    FYI – From an email I received.
    ———

    Existing laws don’t get enforced because it doesn’t suit the party in power’s agenda to do so! If you follow the law and forcibly expel the illegal immigrants they cannot vote for your party’s agendas—and their own free ride!  I suspect there  are many more laws on the books that are not enforced.
      
    Have you or any  in our government ever heard of the ”McCarren-Walter Act Of 1952”?

    I did not know of this Act , but it has been a law for almost 65 years.

    Here are the historic facts that would seem to indicate that many, if not most,of the people we elect to work for us in Washington DC do not have the slightest idea of what laws already exist in our country.

     After several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States, Donald Trump was severely criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities, and even people of certain religions (Muslims). 

     The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among other things, being un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist.

     Congressmen and Senators swore that they would never allow such legislation and our illustrious President called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.
    As Gomer Pyle would say, “Well, Surprise, Surprise!” It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on several occasions.

    Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 allows for the “Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the President, whenever the President finds that the entry of aliens or of any
    class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States . 

     The President may, by proclamation, and for such a period as he shall deem necessary,  suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate.

     And who do you suppose last utilized this process? Why it was Democrat President Jimmy Carter, no less than 37 years ago, in 1979, to keep Iranians out of the United States .

     But he actually did more. 

     He made ALL Iranian students, already in the United States ,
    check in with the government, and then he deported a bunch of them.

     Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, and a
    total of 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979.

    So, what say you about all of the criticism that Donald Trump
    received from the Democrat Senators and Representatives of Obama

     Additionally, it is important to note that the McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an “applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution.”

    Therefore, one could surmise that since the Quran forbids Muslims to
    swearallegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, ALL Muslims should be refused
    immigration to our country.

    Authenticated at:
    http://library.uwb.edu/static/USimmigration/1952_immigration_and_nationality_act.html

     P.S.—-The Muslims’ Shariah Law violates our Constitution, so they have no right to demand they be allowed to use it here in
    America !!!!! If they refuse to obey
    our Constitution, then they need to be deported!!!!!

  4. Peggy says:

    Trump beat Hillary in Butte county.

    NO RECOUNT? HILLARY WON CA County With Most Illegal Aliens By Stunning Margin…Ex-ICE Agent Explains How Easy It is For Illegals To Vote [VIDEO]:

    http://defund.com/no-recount-hillary-won-ca-county-illegal-aliens-stunning-marginex-ice-agent-explains-easy-illegals-vote-video/?utm_source=fnot2&utm_medium=facebook

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.