Posted by jack
Study shows Chico’s violent crime rate has jumped 35.7% in past 5 years. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/03/09/25-cities-where-crime-soaring/409912002/
-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- Art (88)
- Behavior and Psychology (20)
- Business, Industry and Finance (63)
- Constitution and Law (370)
- Consumer Affairs (4)
- Culture (17)
- Deep State (5)
- Economy (3)
- Education (238)
- Environment (74)
- Fraud Alert (8)
- Global Issues (1)
- Health and Medicine (149)
- History (8)
- Humour (94)
- Military (115)
- Morals and Ethics (149)
- News Media (11)
- Police, Crime, Security (215)
- Politics and Government (144)
- Religion (91)
- Science and Technology (19)
- Veterans' Issues (13)
- World (12)
Recent Comments
- ClayPidgeon on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Michael Davis on Life In Chico and Other Places Infected by Bums
- Patricia Lieder on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Dawn on Thaddeus Kerns Boy Aviator
- scott sproat on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
Recent NorCal Blogs Posts
Mr. Jack and Mrs.Tina, do you know how I can get through to George Noory on his show? I try all the call-in numbers but can never get through. I have some tough questions I need answered and since George Noory is the smartest person I know, I figured he’d be able to answer them. I know you are big fans of George and Coast to Coast AM so I figured you would know how to get through to him. Thank you.
Hi Ted, nope, I have no clue beyond the posted numbers. I’ve heard he does interactive chats with his fans online once a week, but you have to belong to his fan club by paying a membership fee.
Thanks. That’s a good idea so I will check out the fan club and interactive chats. I knew asking you would be a good idea because I bet you’re almost as smart as George.
So, you don’t think a poverty rate of 20% has anything to do with this, I suppose?
20 is a little high.
Rising employment don’t do no good if the jobs don’t pay a living wage. Folk just take up auto burglary as a side-line.
And you know all this. But you like your Walmart economy, right? … it pays you nice dividends, right? … so you can just like the homelessness and burglary too, cause that’s what you get from a Walmart economy!
Libby your media preferences keep you grossly misinformed.
Good paying jobs are on the rise. Industry is investing it’s own dollars to train people. One representative is working with business to invest in poor neighborhoods for job creation. Trump has encouraged big business to return to America and several have chosen to do so based on his tax and regulation policies. Unemployment is down and the participation rate is up. Black and Hispanic unemployment has hit lows not seen in quite awhile.
You also fail once again to acknowledge that your party is largely responsible for the homeless in our streets. Your former president failed to make this an important issue and his policies failed to create jobs that kept up with population growth much less began to serve the unemployed created by his depressing tax and regulation policies.
Walmart, by the way, was one of the businesses that gave raises and bonuses to employees because of the tax cuts. Walmart also offered “expanded maternity and parental-leave benefits, and assistance with adoption expenses.”
These “crumbs” may not mean much to the wealthy and privileged Nancy Pelosi or you but it means a great deal to their “more than a million” workers.
I swear to Pete, when Trump leaves office, you’ll still be blaming all his failures on the O-Man. Very feeble.
What do you suppose my chances are of getting you to face up to the first sitting President in history to be sued by an “adult film actress,” as we are calling Stormy these days? Puts little Billy Clinton quite into the shade, this does.
P. S.: Since Walmart made these gestures BEFORE the tax cuts went into effect, … well, this would seem to indicate that they had the resources to do so already … simply chose not to spend them … and now that they’ve made their gestures, do you think they’ll keep on with it?
We shall see.
Libby your comments just don’t reflect the truth about Obama’s eight year long miserable economy OR the fast turn around that is just beginning to happen under the new president. I swear you’d rather eat human ‘dirt” than admit to factual information.
And changing the subject will not erase the facts.
As for Stormy?
She has trouble keeping her story straight. Flat out written denial morphs into hurried “#MeToo” accusation and then develops into judge shopping.
Wanna bet George Soros, or some other feminist Hillary backer, gave her a nudge and assist? What aging porn star wouldn’t “come forward” and change her story for a fat chunk of cash? It is a possibility.
Besides, wasn’t it your feminist buddies that said this stuff was private and had nothing to do with a man’s work performance?
Standards matter. You broke it you own it.
I don’t know why you can’t think clearly about these things. Paying bribes is illegal, against the law, and so on and so forth. I am a great admirer of Stormy’s lawyer, because if it turns out that Trump, way back when, chose not to sign the payoff agreement so he could deny it if he had to later … oooh … he is in the soup.
Now, as to a man and his work … it is a shame that my Garrison has lapsed into Groady-Old-Manhood, but the “Six Minute Iliad” is still a work of art.
I had to switch from Clinton because I’m reasonably certain that he will go down in history for that epic bit of legislative backsliding, the repeal of Glass-Steagall, soiling a dress, and not much else.
Jack apparently Chico ranks 11th for cities with growing crime rates.
When I looked for supporting reports I found many that claimed we haven’t had any murders or attempted murders. Seems at odds with the things we hear on radio reports of breaking news.
Is your son coping okay with Califonia’s sanctuary laws? Must make his job difficult, as if he needed the added pressure.
“Paying bribes is illegal, against the law, and so on and so forth.”
Funny thing, she signed a legal document, an agreement.
In exchange for a sizable settlement for her so-called “injuries” (extortion attempt), she agreed to contract stipulating that she go away and shut up. She didn’t have to take the settlement, but a long drawn out court trial wouldn’t have done her own rep any good and it would have cost her more in legal fees. So she took the money!
Now all of a sudden she wants to have her cake and eat it too and likely for political reasons.
The fact that she took the money makes her case very suspicious.
You don’t think clearly, Libby. You have taken her side due to politics. Nothing wrong with that but at least own it for heavens sake.
A judge, unless he/she too is a partisan, will take a look at the other factors in the case if it ever gets that far.