Happily Posted by Jack
Washington Examiner – Kamala Harris’ first significant political role was an appointment by her powerful then-boyfriend Willie Brown, three decades her senior, to a California medical board that has been criticized as a landing spot for patronage jobs and kickbacks.
Then 30, Harris was dating 60-year-old Willie Brown, at the time the Democratic speaker of the California State Assembly, when he placed her on the California Medical Assistance Commission in 1994. The position paid over $70,000 per year, $120,700 in current money, and Harris served on the board until 1998.
The medical commission met twice a month, and Harris, a United States senator for California since 2017 and now a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, missed about 20% of the meetings each year, according to commission records obtained by the Washington Examiner.
The seven-member board was largely comprised of late-career former state officials who were semi-retired or biding time before retirement. At 30 years old, Harris was the youngest appointee by some three decades. She’s now 54 and he’s 85.
This is why we’re called Corruptifornia….
Related story, “Núñez Aide Gets Post on California Medical Assistance Commission
On Monday, Danny Eaton, a longtime chief-of-staff to former California Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, was appointed to the California Medical Assistance Commission, the Sacramento Bee reports.
Eaton’s compensation for the position will be $56,095 per year (in 2010 most of their work was transferred to another commission). He is expected to begin attending CMAC meetings in December, according to an e-mail from Dave Sebeck, spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles).
The appointment to the commission comes after Nunez directed that Eaton’s salary increase by almost 25% in two years. Eaton also is eligible for a so-called “golden handshake” pension program that would give him credit for two additional years of government service if he retires early (Sanders, Sacramento Bee, 11/4).
This is a little off topic, but do you remember House Speaker Fabian Nunez? His son was involved in a murder and convicted in 2008. His father left office just ahead of charges of numerous acts of corruption.
“The article, published last December, recounts, in sordid, embarrassing detail, the
corrupt depths to which career Hispanic politicians in California bring that apparently genetic brand of corruption to American politics behind the pretense racial inequality and the intrinsic obligation to offset its legacy with dishonesty and crookedness.
Fabian Nuñez’ story, in itself, is indeed motivational and striking, but like many Mexican-American politicians, it becomes tainted with the self-annointed wondrous narrative of over-compensated public bureaucrat.
Nuñez, rising from the Tijuana ghetto and becoming California’s Assembly Speaker by his early 40’s, typically continued his meteoric rise with a resounding plummet back to the reality of his mortal ethnic tendrils due to greed and blind familial psychopathic obligations. https://www.phoenixism.net/archives/17380
Editor’s note: CA is a joke, a virtual lost cause. It has become the most corrupt, most taxed, most overregulated state with the highest paid, self-serving bureaucrats in the history of the United States. What an accomplishment.
Jack, is that you in that hat?
I don’t know if that’s you in that hat but I do know one thing. And that is that the corrupt liberals who infest this blog are all for continued tax increases so these corrupt boards can continue. You will never see the corrupt liberals favoring eliminating these corrupt and useless (except to special interests) boards.
Not me in the hat Joe, (lol) that would be Charles Durning.
Oh, OK, I don’t know who that is but assumed some kind of fancy pants actor…so I looked him up.
Good thing he’s not you because he’s dead!
And yeah, he was an actor but I don’t go to any movies any more. The last movie I went to was “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?”. Spoiler alert…it was not Chris.
“Mortal ethnic tendrils?” What the hell?
That line made me curious, Jack, so I clicked the link, which led to an article that began thusly:
I’m angry at myself for just now finding a wonderful LA Times examination of the 2008 murder of 22-year-old Luis Santos on the San Diego CSU campus at the hands of several college thugs, one of whom happened to be Esteban Nuñez, propitiously the son of California establishmentarian Democratic politician, Fabian Nuñez.
The article, published last December, recounts, in sordid, embarrassing detail, the corrupt depths to which career Hispanic politicians in California bring that apparently genetic brand of corruption to American politics behind the pretense racial inequality and the intrinsic obligation to offset its legacy with dishonesty and crookedness.
Fabian Nuñez’ story, in itself, is indeed motivational and striking, but like many Mexican-American politicians, it becomes tainted with the self-annointed wondrous narrative of over-compensated public bureaucrat.
According to the author you cited, Hispanics have an “apparently genetic” tendency to be corrupt. Looking through the rest of that guy’s blog, his white nationalist feelings are very clear.
Jack, this is exactly what I wanted to write about in the article I told you I was working on: the pipeline between white nationalists and mainstream conservative media. That pipeline was evidence last week when Laura Ingraham promoted Paul Nehlen, who has praised the synagogue shootings, and it’s evident on a smaller scale here on your blog now.
I do not believe you are a white nationalist, but for some reason you stumbled upon this site, then through what I hope was carelessness shared this white nationalist blog approvingly on your site while quoting what is clearly racist language (“mortal ethnic tendrils.”) Does that make you contemplate or reconsider anything about your online practices or the conservative media environment as a whole?
If you’re trying to brainwash Jack with your propaganda…well, it won’t work.
Joe, do you agree with the link Jack provided that Hispanic people are genetically predisposed to corruption?
Do you believe mainstream Republicans should promote that belief?
I am white. I am also a nationalist. Jack, does this make me a “white nationalist?”
Pie, lol, Libby is the resident authority on that one.
Jack, do you really have nothing to say about the white nationalist website you approvingly linked to? Do you really think it’s appropriate to link to a website that claims Hispanics are genetically predisposed to corruption without any objection on your part?
Didn’t see that part Chris, but I feared something like that might come up. And didn’t respond because I’ve been busy. I’m still busy, but I will re-visit the site and see what has you upset. I used the site to refresh our memories about the corruption associated with Kamala, Willy and friends. That was the import part, so I hope you won’t deflect that to something else that was off topic.
Jack, you literally quoted the “mortal ethnic tendrils” part of the post. You’ve posted numerous articles since you wrote this response, yet you’re “too busy” to address the fact that you linked to a white supremacist blog? I have no choice but to conclude you clearly do not care that you did so–nor does any other conservative on this site.
But you’ll complain the next time someone says that conservatives have a racism problem.
Whatever.
Pie Guevara, do you agree with the link Jack provided that Hispanic people are genetically predisposed to corruption?
Do you believe mainstream Republicans should promote that belief?
Jack, I do not insult you. I try to make you understand something you, seemingly, cannot understand: that Willie’s blackness and Nunez’s brownness have absolutely nothing to do with their truly impressive degrees of political … incorrectness.
I haven’t thought of Willie in ages. He’s still alive. I once had a boss who bragged about dining in places Willie also dined. Ah, the charms of the ostentatiously affluent. And then I went off to Wiki to recap Willie’s career. He certainly kept the FBI occupied, back in his salad days.
But it’s true, Kamala may have trouble getting past this. She’s supposed to be brighter than that. If I’d had ambitions, I would have steered well clear of Willie and his appointments.
I once flirted with the notion of joining the DAR. My sister and I both qualify. But my sister reminded me that it would ruin my political career.
Libby, the DAR would ruin your career? I think not, they are a truly benign A-political group; a patriotic organization dedicated to preserving American history. I happened to host a tour for them recently and they were one of the most intelligent, articulate and personable groups I’ve ever had the pleasure to meet. I like history so of course we got along very well! My daughter also qualifies for the DAR, maybe you two should join together?
Lippy has a political career? Doing what? Strategic operations for Hillary Clinton?
Political career? Are you Anne Schwab?
“CA is a joke, a virtual lost cause.”
Absolutely.
Here is the latest on Ebola.
https://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.com/2019/06/ebola-rampaging-superstition-and.html
Bayou Renaissance Man is from South Africa and knows whereof he speaks. If Ebola gets into a place like LA, the “lost cause” will be exponential.
Recommend reading “The Hot Zone” by Richard Preston. Was recently made into a 6-episode mini-series that set viewing records for National Geographic.
God help us if Ebola ever mutates to become airborne . . . . . . .
Time to change those “Welcome to California” freeway signs to “Welcome to Taxifornia. Please take home a dose of Typhus!”
Chris is a lying sack of ****. Ingraham did not “promote” Nehlen, He was one of seven who were part a clip from the AP on voices being silenced in social media. In no way was Nehlen’s appearance in that clip an endorsement or promotion of anyone.
Moreover, Chris is one of the one of the worst kind of liars. A propagandist liar, twisting the truth to fit his malicious, phony, politically motivated narrative and creating a tapestry of lies out half-truths and outright mendacity.
It is unfortunate that Nehlen appeared in that clip but the notion that Laura Ingraham was “promoting” him or his views is absolute bull****.
Fox News response is correct —
“Anyone who watches Laura’s show knows that she is a fierce protector of freedom of speech and the intent of the segment was to highlight the growing trend of unilateral censorship in America.”
“It is obscene to suggest that Laura Ingraham was defending Paul Nehlen’s despicable actions, especially when some of the names in our graphic were pulled from an Associated Press report on best known political extremists banned from Facebook,” the statement read. “Anyone who watches Laura’s show knows that she is a fierce protector of freedom of speech and the intent of the segment was to highlight the growing trend of unilateral censorship in America.”
So, f*** you Chris The Liar.
Pie, the text of the graphic was “Prominent Voices Censored on Social Media” and took place in a segment on how unfortunate it was for so many conservatives to have been banned by social media platforms. A reasonable interpretation of that context would be that Nehlen should not have been banned despite his praise of the synagogue shooter. Another reasonable interpretation that someone who did not know Nehlen’s history would have been that he was unfairly banned due to being a conservative, rather than for being a racist promoter of violence.
In my opinion, without including additional context letting her audience know about Nehlen’s repulsive anti-Semitism, that counts as a promotion. That is an opinion, not a lie. You may disagree with my opinion, but it is reasonable based on the context I have just described. You are being hysterical by trying to turn a difference of opinion into a lie to shield your side from criticism.
Ingraham was unrepentant the next day and suggested that people sharing screenshots of Nehlen’s to show how awful he was were giving him what he wanted. How can she say that while believing that portraying him as a victim of “censorship” didn’t give him exactly what he wanted? White nationalists love portraying themselves as victims of liberal oppression—just like Laura does. Can you not see the hypocrisy here?
If I were you I would be more offended by Ingraham’s suggestion that people like Nehlen, Alex Jones, and Laura Loomer are prominent conservatives. (Again, that suggestion comes from the fact that that was the main thrust of her segment.) I remember when Alex Jones was primarily associated with the left due to his 9/11 conspiracies. What I don’t remember is anyone in the mainstream media defending him. Then during the Obama era Jones became more associated with the right, and now he is commonly used as an example of a right-wing media figure “silenced” by social media. If you don’t want these people associated with you…then tell people like Laura Ingraham to stop associating them with you.
Michelle Malkin was another person on the list. She wrote a whole book defending Japanese internment and suggesting we should do the same with Muslims. But she still enjoys a prominent place in conservative media. So how can you say there is no problem with tolerating racism on the right? How can you get angry when others point out that problem?
You could also tell Jack to stop linking to racist blogs that insist Hispanics are genetically primed for corruption. This is not the first time I have pointed out such links on this site, and somehow, it just keeps happening. How does that not make you stop and think about what your movement tolerates? How do so many people on this blog keep ending up stumbling upon these racist sites?
I haven’t seen any prominent person on the left complain about the banning of Louis Farrakhan or the Krassensteins—in fact, I’ve seen many rejoicing because we don’t want those people associated with us! Getting mad at people who point out the problem is just further sabotaging yourself.
Baby Goebbles doubles down on his specious, lying narrative evidently believing that Post Scripts readers are so stupid that if he keeps repeating it, they will believe it.
Chris The Liar excoriates Laura Ingraham because an awful person who has been censored by social media appears in an AP clip she used to make a point about social media censorship. The notion that Ingraham was trying to “promote” these people is wholly false.
If Louis Farrakhan or some Antifa goon had appeared in that clip what reaction would you predict from Chris? I can imagine he could either keep his big, fat, lying mouth shut or would be bashing her for showing clips of them too. I suppose that if Ingraham ever shows a clip of Adolf Hitler, Chris will be attack her for promoting him!
And this gets right to the point — Chris is a left-wing fascist goon posing as a “Moderate SJW” (his own laughable description) who promotes censorship and engages in specious propaganda to use as a political weapon in order to bash, silence and marginalize his political opponents. His position by now should be pretty clear to any Post Scripts participant — censor the undesirables, take no prisoners and attack anyone who does not join in with him and goosestep to his brass band.
Note the dig of Michelle Malkin who presents a well researched case that Japanese internment was a military necessity. Whether Malkin is right or wrong, this makes her an undesirable pariah who should be shunned, attacked and whipped like a dog by progressive SJW fascists like Chris and be be driven from the arena of discourse. For Chris to call Malkin a racist for these views is a paradigm of the ridiculous, vile and just plain stupid attack methods of leftist propaganda. No matter how despicable Chris and his fascistic propaganda tactics are you cannot escape the fact he is a complete idiot just like his his idiot Antifa dopplegangers. Progressives, in my experience, can be described in two words — idiot cowards — and Chris has done his best to live up to those ideals.
Malkin writes herself — “My aim is to kick off a vigorous national debate on what has been one of the most undebatable subjects in Amerian history and law: President Franklin Roosevelt’s homeland security policies that led to the evacuation and relocation of 112,000 ethnic Japanese on the West Coast, as well as the internment of tens of thousands of enemy aliens from Japan, Germany, Italy, and other Axis nations. I think it’s vitally important to get the history right because the WWII experience is often invoked by opponents of common-sense national security profiling and other necessary homeland security measures today.”
I will not, do not and have not defended racism in any form yet Chris has speciously called me a racist and a bigot on many occasions. In WWII there were many examples of overtly racist war propaganda by the Allies against two fascist enemies of mankind who brought more misery and death to the world than any other force in history (except possibly for the Communist regimes in China, Russia and Indo-China and elsewhere). I refuse to approve or condemn such war propaganda activities as it was a product of its time and historical fact. No doubt Chris’ idea of waging war is to kiss the enemies’ ass and apologize for our “xenophobia” and “racism” in the same manner he has kissed Islamo-fascist ass.
I will not condemn Jack or anyone else for linking to sites Chris declares as racist. Whether they are actually racist or not. Sometimes people make mistakes to make a point. Chris is a lying, extreme left-wing propagandist demagogue who cites the lying extreme left-wing propagandist demagogues of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The SPLC consists of some of the most vile politically charged left-wing operatives on the planet. Chris is no “Moderate SJW” as he absurdly claims. That is an oxymoron. He is one of them, the SPLC.
I do not understand the recent references to certain peoples’ supposed genetics. Are they an exaggeration to make a point? Are they meant to shock in order to gain attention? Are they being facetious to make a larger point about political corruption amongst Hispanics in California? I do not know. But I do know you have never seen nor you will you ever see Chris excoriate or even criticize the overt racists of La Raza or MeCHA. Both of these racist organizations were founded upon the claim racial superiority due to racial miscegenation of the Spanish colonizers with “New World” natives. No you have not and you never will see Chris criticize the Hispanic Master Race and their proponents.
The bottom line here is that Chris is just another self-appointed left-wing propagandist jerk who speciously uses terms like racism, bigotry and, xenophobia as a club. He is the product of a corrupted, fascistic, virtually monolithic left-wing academia and, evidently, is now one of the mightily brainwashed body snatchers in a position of authority somewhere in K-12. Can you imagine this progressive automaton teaching “critical thinking” to 10 year olds?
Chris actually supports censorship and fears freedom of speech — except for his own and speech he deems appropriate (that is left-speak). Moreover he actually expects me to join him on his propaganda crusade! No, Chris, I have no interest to become another mindless, goosestepping speech Nazi like you. No Chris, I will comment on that which I care to comment on and you can go pound wet concrete. If you wish to take my silence on certain things as some sort of endorsement, well, that is just the sort of complete and utter ass you are.
Bottom line: Chris is a liar and a risible, hypocritical goon/clown and should be treated as such.
UPDATE: Deconstructing The Quote and Chris —
OK, I find this sentence difficult to parse and cumbersome — in fact it is one wreck of a sentence — but here goes — “The article, published last December, recounts, in sordid, embarrassing detail, the corrupt depths to which career Hispanic politicians in California bring that apparently genetic brand of corruption to American politics behind the pretense racial inequality and the intrinsic obligation to offset its legacy with dishonesty and crookedness.”
“apparently genetic brand of corruption” — This does not translate to “a genetic brand of corruption.” It is apparently genetic, evidently, because of the number of corrupt Hispanic politicians and their modus operandi of corrupting politics with dishonesty and crookedness behind a phony facade of racial inequality. Sounds like just about any Democrat regardless of race.
Chris, evidently, takes this to mean the author is asserting that Hispanics have a genetic predisposition for political corruption. That is not what he is saying. He may be saying it is “apparently genetic” because of the prevalence of political corruption amongst Hispanic politicians and that they use racial identity politics to further such corruption. But it serves Chris’ political demagoguery and self-appointed Gestapo word police propaganda to describe it as racist. The the author could actually be trying to be wry, not racist. And you all know Chris loves to bash with his false and specious racism accusations. He is such a predictable jerk.
To be honest, I do not know, nor pretend to know (like Chris) exactly what the author believes. Nor do I care. If the author actually believes that some identifiable ethnic group or “race” has a propensity for political corruption, then he has certainly not been paying attention. If the author actually believes that Hispanics have a genetic predilection for political corruption I would say he is a silly and foolish bigot.
But then again, noting the abject corruption of so many Hispanic politicians in so many Hispanic countries south of the border and knowing that La Raza and MeCHA depend heavily upon bigoted racist notions of their own genetic superiority, maybe the author is on to something if, indeed, that is what he is implying.
You should make note that in that last statement above I am being somewhat facetious. I do not actually believe that Hispanics are genetically superior OR predisposed to political corruption. But given the historical facts, it may appear to be so. Correlation is not causation. Chris himself, on the other hand himself, believes that correlation IS causation. If you have ever listened to him bloviate on climate change you would know that. If there actually is an identifiable factor for a predilection for political corruption it would likely be an ethnic one created by social/historical factors, not “race.” There are few governments more corrupt than the Mexican government, or say a couple dozen countries in Central and South America including Venezuela which was once lauded by Bernie Sanders and other idiots. Food for thought.
So here Chris, again, is being a specious, progressive SJW fascist blowhard and is full of it when he attacks the author for overt racism and Jack for compliant or covert racism.
Take your charges of and stick them where the sun don’t shine, Chris. Take your condescending “advice”, carve it onto a long stick, and shove it there too.
Hear, hear!
Thank you Pie. You nailed him.
Sir, this is an Arby’s.
Good article pushing back against the left-wingers attack on Laura Ingraham.
The Fake News Attack on Laura Ingraham:
“A defense of free speech is not a defense of content.
Laura’s exact words were these:
Ingraham: “These are some of the people they have shunned. Are you in there?
Owens: There I am! (Laughter)
Ingraham: But its people who believe in border enforcement, people who believe in national sovereignty…
Owens: People who believe in black America.
Ingraham: Oh yeah, heaven forbid! Black conservatives. Keep them out of it. Back of the bus for you! But Candace, I think this is going to be a moment, though, for us to stand up to these censors. They are the new censors.
Owens: That’s correct. And it will backfire as I said. We’re going to it in 2020.
So the obvious question? Where in there did Laura defend anti-Semitism? Obvious answer — she never said a word about it.
To be crystal clear, she never defended Paul Nehlen’s obviously racist and anti-Semitic views. Not once.
Again. To defend everyone’s right to free speech in this country is hardly the same as defending the content of what a person says with that free speech.
A while back, CNN president Jeff Zucker accepted a “First Amendment Award.” In his acceptance speech he had these lines:
We are here tonight to celebrate the First Amendment and oh how do we love that First Amendment. If we could we’d kiss it like Donald Trump kissed that flag.
By the standards of Mediaite, John Berman, and the Washington Post, Jeff Zucker just endorsed every publication out there that uses the First Amendment to push whatever racist, sexist, anti-Semitic garbage they wish to spout. Here are a few examples of publications that exist because of the First Amendment that Jeff Zucker celebrated: The Crusader, published by the Ku Klux Klan. The Daily Stormer, described in Wikipedia as a publication of American neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Over here is the website of the Communist Party USA.”
https://spectator.org/the-fake-news-attack-on-laura-ingraham/?fbclid=IwAR0XJsHqVtepQXmcAa59WglqfMWJVPHDokBgwdwhgHMYUxGEgeufYSK2b7s
From your own quote, Peggy:
Ingraham: But its people who believe in border enforcement, people who believe in national sovereignty…
Owens: People who believe in black America.
Ingraham: Oh yeah, heaven forbid! Black conservatives. Keep them out of it. Back of the bus for you! But Candace, I think this is going to be a moment, though, for us to stand up to these censors. They are the new censors.
The message of this is that the people in the graphic Laura used were censored simply for being run-of-the-mill conservatives–for, in her words, “people who believe in border enforcement, people who believe in national sovereignty.” (Paul Nehlen would be surprised to find out from Candace Owens that he believes in “black America.”) How can you seriously deny that this soft-peddles and whitewashes their views?
Re Chris, The Lying Progressive Extremist Propagandist Scum: “Pie, the text of the graphic was “Prominent Voices Censored on Social Media” and took place in a segment on how unfortunate it was for so many conservatives to have been banned by social media platforms. A reasonable interpretation… blah, blah, blah, blah.”
What a pile of abjectly stupid and specious bull****. EXACTLY what I have come to expect from you, Chris The Liar. Undoubtedly you take your marching orders Media Matters and whatever other pin-headed extreme left-wing bull**** organizations you subscribe to. The entire segment was not just about conservatives being silenced, it was also about “prominent people” being silenced and the censorship being practiced in general on social media. Your single “context” assertion is just the sort of asininity and studied stupidity I have come to expect from you. That you conflate all of the information presented into a single specious context of “prominent conservatives” and then call that “A reasonable interpretation” (!) only serves to demonstrate how much of a stupid and specious liar you are.
You could simply be a natural at stupidity Chris, but I have a hunch you have been studying to be stupid, at least in your university years. Not only are you a wretched failure at recognizing classical/logical fallacies your “critical thinking” is a farce. I shudder to think of any student having to suffer your idiocy.
Evidently The English Major seems to have trouble with the word “prominent” too. No wonder earning an English major at university is so often considered the “booby prize.”
Prominent
1) standing out so as to be seen easily; conspicuous; particularly noticeable
2) standing out beyond the adjacent surface or line; projecting.
3) leading, important, or well-known:
No where in that definition does it say a prominent person is “respected.” Or is a “respected conservative.” And neither does Laura Ingraham or the context imply such as you so falsely and idiotically assert. Of course there can be conservative racists, anti-semites and so on just as there can be such stupid people of any stripe. You yourself, Chris, are an insufferable bigot. A self-confirmed bigot and a stupid closet racist who poses as Mr. Sensitivity and thinks his laughable self-declared “Moderate SJW” handle gives him some sort of immunity. (By the way, there is no other kind of bigot or racist other than stupid.) I’ll never forget when your own innate racism was on display when you ignorantly asserted that Malaysia was a backwards country (and by implication, so are Malaysian people). What an ignorant and stupid ass you are.
In no way in that segment does Laura Ingraham in any manner suggest “that people like Nehlen, Alex Jones, and Laura Loomer are prominent conservatives” you half-baked liar nitwit. You infer that you damn dope, Ingraham does not imply such. And you infer it because you are a brain-washed, brain-dead fool who looks for any excuse — no matter how thin, specious and moronic — to bash conservatives.
Chris, you are definitely in good company with CNN, MSLSD, NYT, Media Matters, Salon, The daily Kos, The Young Turks, Rachel Maddows, Morning Joes, Don Lemons and Van Jonses of the extreme left-wing, lying, dirty yellow journalism horse’s asses. You present your opinion as fact and then try to wriggle your way out of it. What a worm.
And then there is this! “You are being hysterical by trying to turn a difference of opinion into a lie to shield your side from criticism.”
No sir, you infer I am somehow being “hysterical” to insult me and lamely attempt to shield yourself from a bald-faced lie you have presented as fact. I am not being “hysterical” at all. I am calling a spade a spade and a liar a liar and you don’t like being exposed for the lying propagandist scum that you are. Of course, you could be so stupid as not realize you are promulgating a lie while promulgating a vicious falsehood. While pondering the depth of stupidity that would require I came to the realization that — given your history of stupidity in the logical fallacy department and that you are a self-exposed closet racist — yes, indeed, you are that stupid. Such abject stupidity also fits nicely into the profile of a typical progressive.
It was difficult to find a clip of the sequence without some left-wing lying jackass like Chris stepping all over it with their bull**** but I found one. I invite all Post Scripts readers to view it and come to their own conclusions about how much of a stupid, despicable, lying, wannabe Goebbels pissant punk Chris is.
PELOSI TRYING TO DICTATE WHAT’S POSTED ONLINE
Pie, after you bizarrely decided to follow me on Twitter and responded to a good faith question of mine with your usual ranting hysterics, I asked that you please be more civil if you were going to follow me, or I would just block you. Unfortunately you could not bring yourself to meet this low expectation, so I had to block you. I will not be responding to your unhinged rants. Seek anger management therapy and then get back to me.
Chris, why not just deal with the facts in [my] story? Why go off on a tangent, why switch our narrative? Is it because this is something you can attack, but yet is not relevant to anything I said?
Debate the other guy if you don’t like everything in his article, but not me, I didn’t write it.
Now as to your opinion who is racist, you seem to be wearing rose colored glasses when it comes to many Hispanic legislators being corrupt (influence peddling) and representing Hispanics as a valued special interest group. Get a clue! They have a CA Latino Legislators Caucus (CLLC) to represent Latinos, promote Latino issues and causes, elect Latinos, hire Latinos, give jobs to Latinos, support sanctuary cities, support La Raza, Mecha, etc., Why is this not racist? Insert the word, Caucasian for Latino and you would be screaming racism.