by Jack
Meet Mariam Nabatanzi, second from left on top – black top, takes pro-life to a whole new level.
A woman from Uganda has given birth to a jaw-dropping 38 children, and surprisingly she is only 37 years old.
The mother, Mariam Nabatanzi, has delivered all her children at home except her latest addition who is now four months old, reports the Nairobi News.
The newborn had to be delivered by caesarean section at a local hospital. The doctor who delivered the 38th baby tied the woman’s tubes so she could no long give birth.
The first of the babies began coming when Nabatanzi was married off at age 12 to a man in his 40’s. The current father is no where to be found, he left allegedly because raising 38 kids was too much for him.
Off topic but this is a big deal.
https://usawatchdog.com/after-trump-war-only-one-party-will-be-standing-kevin-shipp/
Joe:
In the past, articles like this could be classified along with climate change fanatics predicting catastrophes and other fictional horror stories.
There are reasons to pay attention this time. All the democrat leaders and would-be leaders are behaving so irrationally it’s like an epidemic of psychosis. If you’ve ever seen a pack of dogs get together and turn homicidal, that’s the DNC and the MSM. Trump’s election triggered something you’d only expect to see in a place like Somalia.
It’s amazing Trump has withstood this unending, unrelenting, rabid attack as well as he has.
I agree with the article to the extent that something dramatic is going to happen, regardless of who wins this war. It won’t be pretty, but then it hasn’t been for some time, has it?
Pie Here: Obviously Trump has a very thick skin. One of his admirable qualities. It seems he really doesn’t care what is said about him, no matter how nasty, specious and vile. And he doesn’t mind tossing the crap slingers’ crap right back in their faces. While not so presidential in that latter respect, he has no problem fighting back. It is really kind of funny listening to the crap slingers whine and complain about “unpresidential behavior” when Trump treats them like they treat him and is actually better and far more amusing than his rabid, out of control detractors.
Seen the meme of Jan Brewer pointing her finger at Obama on the tarmac in Phoenix, for which she was excoriated and called a racist for being disrespectful to President Obama?
Compare how Brewer was treated by the Dems and media after to how Pelosi who is now being called a hero and brave to pointing her finger at president Trump. She too disrespected the president and the office he serves. But, because of her hate for him and the media’s support he will be forced to deal with this until Jan. 2025, unless she’s not speaker after next year.
Also, remember the one reporter who yelled out a question in the Rose Garden at Obama, who was later censured and sent to the woodshed for being so rude to the man who occupied the Oval Office and could walk on water? Trump being yelled at at every press briefing isn’t just an attack on Trump it’s against the 63million who voted for him and the millions more who will next year.
Rush this morning recommended the below article. Long, but worth reading.
Why Washington D.C. Compulsively Lies About Donald Trump:
“Beltway types still haven’t grasped that voters decided long before Trump arrived on the political scene that most of what passes for standard operating procedure in D.C. is just as farcical.”
https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/21/why-washington-d-c-compulsively-lies-about-donald-trump/
She too disrespected the president and the office he serves.
No one has disrespected the office more than the tweeter-in-chief himself. Obama comported himself with dignity and grace and that wasn’t enough for you people. Obama never referred to Jan Brewer as a “third grade” (he meant “third-rate”) politician. Trump behaves like a boor and you get mad at people for pointing it out. If there is no dignity left in the office when Trump finally leaves it won’t be Nancy Pelosi’s fault.
Obviously Trump has a very thick skin.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It seems he really doesn’t care what is said about him, no matter how nasty, specious and vile.
Yes, that’s why he spends so much time each day talking about exactly what was said about him and how mad it makes him. Because he doesn’t care.
Thin-skinned bullies admire thin-skinned bullies. You mistake Trump’s faux tough guy act–which is easily seen through by any self-aware person–for the real thing. It’s genuinely sad.
Pie Here: Mr. Souza seems to think that because Trump is perfectly happy to toss the crap thrown at him right back at crap slingers like himself, this makes him “thin skinned.” Uh, ok. Whatever psychobabble analysis floats his boat for today.
The oddest thing about Chris is that his behavior in Post Scripts is hardly even tempered nor respectful towards women or anyone else. No one here defends the nasty things Trump has said yet we are supposed to put up with Mr. Souza’s own vile behavior? Has he ever tried to make a legitimate point without lashing out and launching into a tirade of puerile personal abuse, snark and slurs? No, he has not. He is completely oblivious to his own horrid character flaws.
It is mildly amusing to see Mr. Souza talking about self-awareness when such a facility is certainly not a forte with Mr. Souza. He obviously enjoys his status as a troll and that will never change.
Given that Chris Souza has appointed himself a Post Scripts Troll, perhaps it is time to simply ignore him. After all, the bottom line for people like Chris Souza is to get attention. Attention is what he craves.
I suppose I could just ban him but that would go against the precepts of Jack and Tina and I won’t do that. This is their blog and I consider myself an honored guest. I will not silence Souza even though his offensive behavior merits such.
Yesterday Mr. Souza, after a typically asinine tirade, asked Is that what you want to hear? Seriously, WANT to hear? How bizarre is that? What planet is he from? Souza could drop dead this instant and I could not care less, want doesn’t even enter into the equation.
David, a thick-skinned person would not refer to the constitutional and legal process of impeachment being used against them as a “lynching.”
A self-pitying racist with no respect for history, and an egocentric belief that his self-inflicted suffering is as great as that suffered by the black community? That’s the type of person who would do that.
And that’s the type of person you’re defending. And no amount of “The left did it first!” is ever going to justify that, partly because it isn’t true. Nor are your attempts to pretend that my call-outs of the dishonest and immoral defenses of such behavior are equivalent to said terrible behavior.
More psychobabble from the king of mindless babble. And, OH MY, Mr. Souza gets to toss out the racist slur again, the fall back position of all progressives. The sad thing about this knee-jerk habit is that Souza and his ilk have made the term meaningless. Racism is a vile thing and abusing the word by using it as a political tool only serves to dilute it.
Democrats are, of course, using impeachment as a political tool and Trump naturally fights back as any President might do (Clinton comes to mind). Evidently Souza would prefer Trump not and bow to his betters on the Rat side of the isle. *YAWN* It really is as simple as that. It is interesting how Nasty Pelosi and her gang are handling it though. In secrecy. A little bit unusual for impeachment proceedings. What are they afraid of? (Uh, duh.)
In any case, there is nothing more I would like to see than the Rats take the impeachment public and go for it. Eventually they will have to. I WANT the Rats to proceed with impeachment and have said so on several occasions. Let the bricks fall where they may.
Souza lives in some sort of weird, twisted progressive fascist troll fantasy land of his own manufacture. Moreover, this absurd, mindless, lying scumbag turd keeps insisting I am “defending” Trump. That is as idiotic and as far from the truth as it gets, folks.
First, it was the Democrat’s KKK thugs that lynched Blacks and Republicans. It was Justice Thomas who told Biden he was being subjected to a, ‘High-tech lynching.’ Democrats are doing the same to Trump that they’ve historically done to anyone who opposes them.
Second, I am very concerned all of the deposition records being conducted in secrecy by Schifty-Shift’s committee will disappear and be destroyed, just like Hillary’s emails and electronic devices. Steps should be taken to insure they are ALL preserved, since republican committee members are not allowed to have copies and can only read them when Schift’s staff member is present in the room.
Racism is a vile thing and abusing the word by using it as a political tool only serves to dilute it.
If you were a critical thinker, you would realize that by the same token, lynching is a vile thing and abusing the word by using it as a political tool only serves to dilute it.
But you are not a critical thinker.
Democrats are, of course, using impeachment as a political tool and Trump naturally fights back as any President might do (Clinton comes to mind).
You cannot, of course, find statements by Bill Clinton about his impeachment that come even remotely close to Trump’s statements about his impeachment, or you would have already done so. When, exactly, did President Clinton call for Newt Gingrich to be arrested for treason? When did he call Democrats who supported the inquiry “human scum?”
Moreover, this absurd, mindless, lying scumbag turd keeps insisting I am “defending” Trump. That is as idiotic and as far from the truth as it gets, folks.
You are, of course, defending Trump, and everyone here knows it. For you to deny it is bizarre.
Re Souza’s amazing statement “If you were a critical thinker, you would realize that by the same token, lynching is a vile thing and abusing the word by using it as a political tool only serves to dilute it.”
This is pretty funny coming from a person who declared he would personally be first in line to hold a black person’s feet to the fire. Would that foot burning come before, after, or during the lynching?
Peggy, your belief that Democrats remain the same party they were a hundred years ago remains delusional, and easily fact-checked. Martin Luther King, Jr. himself condemned the rising racism among the Republican party in the early 1960s, when the Southern strategy began. But I’m sure you know more about racism than he did.
The “Southern Strategy” is yet another big fat lie concocted by Democrats to demonize Republicans and deflect from their own long and continuing history of racism. True enough, SOME members of the Republican Party attempted to exploit racial polarization to win votes in the 60’s.
In a 2005 address to the NAACP from Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman apologized for his party’s failure to reach out to the black community in the aftermath of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, stating, “Some Republicans gave up on winning the African-American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization… I am here as Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong.”
Perhaps Mr. Souza should review some of Democrat President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s comments from that era and rethink the “southern” strategies of that time.
Peggy, just look at the black unemployment, poverty and welfare figures in any Blue city and the systemic, institutionalized racism of the Democratic Party becomes fairly obvious.
Pie, no more proof is needed than to compare the black and other minorities’ employment rates of those living in areas controlled by democrats with Trump’s historic low unemployment and high employment for all minority groups, women and even 16 year olds.
The monetary gains for middle income earners has skyrocketed under Trump. No sane democrat with minimal common sense and critical thinking skills would ever vote for their party again.
It’s a Middle-Class Boom:
“This study by former Census Bureau researchers and now statisticians at Sentier Research has found gigantic income gains for the middle class under Trump. The median or average-income family has seen a gain of $5,003 since Trump came into office. Median family income is now (August 2019) $65,976, up from about $61,000 when he entered office (January 2017).
Under George W. Bush, the household income gains were a little over $400 in eight years, and under Barack Obama the gains were $1,043. That was in eight years for each. Under Trump, in less than three years, the extra income is about three times larger.
These gains under Trump are so large in such a short period of time that I asked the Sentier Research team to triple-check the numbers. Sure enough, on each occasion, the income swing was $5,000.
This is a bonanza for the middle class, and the extra income in tens of millions of Americans’ pockets is getting spent. Consumers are king in America today, and fatter wallets translate into more store sales. Home Depot and Lowe’s recently recorded huge sales surges.
The tax cut also added an additional $2,500 to a typical family of four’s after-tax incomes. So after taking account of taxes owed, the income of most middle-class families is up closer to $6,000 in the Trump era.
Memo to Pelosi: That ain’t crumbs.”
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/10/15/its_a_middle-class_boom_141497.html
I must elaborate on Stephen Moore’s complete lack of credibility in economic circles:
Paul Krugman and many others have called Stephen Moore a liar. The UC Berkeley Economics Professor (and influential blogger) Brad DeLong notes that “Stephen Moore has zero credibility.” The editorial page director of the Kansas City Star announced that she “won’t be running anything else from Stephen Moore” after she discovered “substantial factual errors” in two of Moore’s columns. Jonathan Chait, in a recent New York Magazine piece, calls Moore a “famous idiot” and notes (correctly) that: “Stephen Moore’s career as an economic analyst has been a decades-long continuous procession of error and hackery…Even conservative economists who might share Moore’s policy preferences have spoken out against his nomination. Harvard University economist Greg Mankiw, who advised then-President George W. Bush, wrote that Moore doesn’t have the “intellectual gravitas” for an important job like the Fed.
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/27/707312764/economists-forecast-stephen-moore-wouldnt-be-good-for-fed-post
Paul Krugman and many others have called Stephen Moore a liar. The UC Berkeley Economics Professor (and influential blogger) Brad DeLong notes that “Stephen Moore has zero credibility.” The editorial page director of the Kansas City Star announced that she “won’t be running anything else from Stephen Moore” after she discovered “substantial factual errors” in two of Moore’s columns. Jonathan Chait, in a recent New York Magazine piece, calls Moore a “famous idiot” and notes (correctly) that: “Stephen Moore’s career as an economic analyst has been a decades-long continuous procession of error and hackery.”
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/03/26/stephen-moore-really
Really, you could very easily start citing more serious people than this. But those people won’t tell you exactly what you want to hear.
Paul Krugman himself is a liar and a famous idiot.
Hmmm, evidently the self appointed Post Scripts Troll thinks I give a crap about Moore or Krugman. Two peas in a pod.
Krugman was the idiot who said the stock market would crash if Trump won. Instead the Dow went up the next day from about 18,000 and has gone up to almost 27,000 today, “up 53%.”
Facts are facts. Looks like Moore deserves the Nobel prize instead of Krugman. LOL Wonder if he got his because of Obama. We all know how much Obama deserved his. Right!
Paul Krugman: Trump will bring global recession:
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/krugman-trump-global-recession-2016-231055
What economic recession?:
https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/458876-what-economic-recession
The Trump Report Card We Do Get To See – Stock Market Effectiveness:
“Were there really thousands of points?
Clearly, Trump is referring to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), which is currently about 26,000. At the close on election day (November 8, 2016), the DJIA was about 18,300. So, check – The 7,700 gain (42%) certainly qualifies as thousands of points – and that does not include dividends, which take the total return up to 53%.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johntobey/2019/08/28/the-trump-report-card-we-do-get-to-seestock-market-effectiveness/#5a80f9ed5289
Oh, I don’t know:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/politics/donald-trump-cabinet-meeting/index.html
Sounds like one fragile fellow to me. I said earlier that I don’t think he can possible really want a second term, and I found somebody who agrees with me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyKAimNA0to
“He worries about out of control civilians going on a rampage.”
You mean like this guy:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/10/21/maga-hat-man-bear-repellant-trump-protest-mxp-vpx.hln/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/
Well, that gal with 38 kids could move to Kali with her whole fam damily. The hits just keep on comin’.
“Over the objections of city officials throughout the state, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill that effectively ends single-family zoning in California.”
…..
“The companies that own single-family houses to rent them out are similarly “securitizing” the homes. Bonds and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) backed by single-family rental homes are now a thing on Wall Street.
So the neighbors of a California home owned by one of these corporate landlords can expect the construction to start immediately. Companies, especially publicly traded companies, will do whatever is allowed to maximize revenue. Gov. Newsom has just allowed them to build three rental units on a single-family lot.”
Link–
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/10/19/the-end-of-single-family-zoning-in-california-susan-shelley/
On Mexican State Collapse: a Guest Post by El Anti-Pozolero
_____________________________________________
“You may have read the news just a few days back: the Mexican military captured not one but two of El Chapo’s sons in the heart of Culiacán, the Sinaloan capital. One son freed himself—which is to say his entourage and retainers at hand overpowered and killed the soldiers at hand—and then, in a decisive riposte, seized the entire city center of Culiacán to compel the liberation of his brother.
The forces that emerged were in the literal sense awesome and awful. Heavy weaponry that would be familiar on any Iraqi, Syrian, or Yemeni battlefield was brought to bear. More and worse: custom-built armored vehicles, designed and built to make a Sahel-warfare technical look like an amateur’s weekend kit job, were rolled out for their combat debut. Most critically, all this hardware was manned by men with qualities the Mexican Army largely lacks: training, tactical proficiency, and motivation.
Then the coup de grace: as the Chapo sons’ forces engaged in direct combat with their own national military, kill squads went into action across Culiacán, slaughtering the families of soldiers engaged in the streets.
Cowed and overmatched—most crucially in the moral arena—the hapless band of soldiers still holding the second son finally received word from Mexico City, direct from President AMLO himself: surrender. Surrender and release the prisoner.”
Link–
https://claireberlinski.substack.com/p/on-mexican-state-collapse-a-guest
Five sets of quadruplets, so it’s not quite so ghastly.
And this country is FULL of FELLAS who can’t look after one!
Why you want to set you native gender up for this kind of less-than-flattering explication is beyond me.
It’s a human interest story Libby, c’mon. I had no clue a women could deliver so many children.
Jack … you don’t REALLY believe that, do you? Come on, a modicum of self-awareness? You’ve never posted about the Duggars, and, as a matter of pregnancies, Ms. Duggar’s 17, nearly matches this lady’s 18.
Did you hear our President is calling the impeachment investigation a “lynching”.
Would that it were so.