Posted by Tina
Pictures are meaningful and in terms of diplomacy it’s pretty important to make sure we get the images right. That’s why I find a story out of The Washington Free Beacon today a bit troubling:
The map of the Middle East displayed in an Obama administration video released days before President Barack Obama’s visit to Israel shows the Jewish state dispossessed of substantial parts of its current territory, including its capital.
The map of Israel, displayed repeatedly during the video, shows the Golan Heights, Jerusalem, northern Israel, and areas surrounding what is currently the West Bank as non-Israeli territory. The Golan Heights is shown as part of Syria; Jerusalem is shown as part of the West Bank; and northern Israel is shown as part of Lebanon.
The itinerary on the White House website also implies that Jerusalem is neither Israel’s capital nor even part of Israel.
The video, posted on You Tube, is also linked in the article. It’s hard to imagine that the President can position himself as an unbiased broker of peace when he has publicly put a stamp of approval on a map that bears no resemblance to current borders.
Contradictions of purpose and intent:
The Washington Examiner:
Upon his arrival in Israel the President had this to say:
I don’t want to say the President is purposely being deceitful so I will just ask…what are the American people to think of these conflicting messages?
As far as Obama is concerned that map is 100% accurate. I think his hate for Israel is about as strong as his hate for the US.
So Who Really Was That Obama Heckler in Jerusalem? (Hint: He’s Not Who the Media Said He Was)
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/22/so-who-really-was-that-obama-heckler-in-jerusalem-hint-hes-not-who-the-media-said-he-was/