This week much of the talk about gun control concerns New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg‘s $12 million ad campaign to put pressure on senators in key states to support legislation that he backs. Or the talk is about the National Rifle Association’s pushback against the Bloomberg campaign. Then there was last week’s mini-tempest over Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid‘s decision not to include Sen. Dianne Feinstein‘s assault-weapon ban in a comprehensive gun-control bill the Senate will take up next month.
One thing you don’t hear much about in the discussions of guns: race.
That is an astonishing omission, because race ought to be an inescapable part of the debate. Gun-related violence and murders are concentrated among blacks and Latinos in big cities. Murders with guns are the No. 1 cause of death for African-American men between the ages of 15 and 34. But talking about race in the context of guns would also mean taking on a subject that can’t be addressed by passing a law: the family-breakdown issues that lead too many minority children to find social status and power in guns.
The statistics are staggering. In 2009, for example, the Centers for Disease Control reported that 54% of all murders committed, overwhelmingly with guns, are murders of black people. Black people are about 13% of the population.
The Justice Department reports that between 1980 and 2008, “blacks were six times more likely than whites to be homicide victims and seven times more likely than whites to commit homicide.”
The dire implications of these numbers is evident in a Children’s Defense Fund report that included a chilling historical perspective: The 44,038 black children killed by guns since 1979 (when national data on the age of gun violence victims was first collected) is “nearly 13 times more” than all the black people killed by lynching in the 86-year period of 1882 to 1968.
This awful reality explains why support for gun control in the black and Hispanic community is overwhelming (71% among blacks and 78% of Hispanics, according to a recent Pew poll). That is a marked contrast with national polls on new gun laws. Those polls show 46% of Americans of all races backing the right to own guns versus 50% who agree to the need for more limits on gun owners. Apparently, the heart of opposition to new gun regulations is in the white community. Yet white people face far less daily violence with guns.
The debate over gun control too often seems a matter of abstractions about the meaning of the Constitution and the permissible capacities of ammunition magazines. Why is so little time spent on a question of more immediate concern—namely, why are so many young black people using guns to kill their neighbors?
President Obama, a hero in black America as the first black president, has been remarkably quiet on this issue until recently. It was only in December, after the mass killing of mostly white school children in Newtown, Conn., by a white man, that the president took the political risk of backing new gun-control legislation.
Young blacks’ violent deaths from handguns hadn’t moved him to such action. The president spoke publicly about that matter only after the recent gun murder of a 15-year-old girl from his hometown of Chicago who had performed at his second inaugural. “Last year there were 443 murders with firearms in this city and 65 were people under 18,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s the equivalent of a Newtown every four months. This is not just a gun issue. It is also an issue of the communities that we are building.”
In speaking about social breakdown in those minority communities, the president put the gun issue in the context of high rates of out-of-wedlock births that lead to high rates of childhood poverty. “I wish I had a father who was around and involved,” the president said, in words that echoed loudly through black and Latino neighborhoods nationally because he revealed a pain so common, yet so rarely confessed, among young people of color.
The shame and silence is enforced by civil-rights leaders who speak in support of gun control but never about a dysfunctional gangster-rap culture that glorifies promiscuity, drug dealers and the power of the gun.
“Loving, supporting parents . . . [are] the single most important thing,” the president told his audience of young, mostly minority children at Hyde Park Academy High School in Chicago. He made the case for parents as the key to giving children a sense of self-esteem beyond the barrel of a gun.
Almost 50 years ago, when the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, the national out-of-wedlock birthrate was 7%. Today it is over 40%. According to the CDC, the out-of-wedlock birthrate for white children was just 2% in the 1960s. Today it is 30%. Among black children, the out-of-wedlock birthrate has skyrocketed from 20% in the 1960s to a heartbreaking 72% today. The Hispanic out-of-wedlock rate, which has been measured for a much shorter period, was below 40% in 1990 and stands at more than 50% as of the 2010 census.
When President Obama tried to speak to this crippling dynamic in 2008, he was basically told to shut up by Rev. Jesse Jackson. The Chicago-based activist said: “Barack was talking down to black people,” then he added a vulgar threat about what he wanted to do in response. The moment revealed the high cost of speaking honestly about social breakdown in black America.
I support gun control. But speaking honestly about the combustible mix of race and guns may be more important to stopping the slaughter in minority communities than any new gun-control laws.
Mr. Williams is a political analyst and a columnist for the Hill.
A version of this article appeared March 27, 2013, on page A17 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Race and the Gun Debate.
The research this is twisted from did make an interesting finding. Of people who die by gun, white people are more likely to have shot themselves (aka suicide); black people are more likely to be killed by someone else.
What Juan has done with this says more about Juan (and you) than it does about the actual research.
And the findings in no way diminish the proposition that if gun access were more difficult, death rates in both categories would probably come down some.
Juan Williams is right that our focus should be on minority communities when looking at the issue of violence and death (by guns or anything else). The problem is the breakdown in the family, morals, and values.
White America has been bullied into relative silence. Any observation, no matter how well meaning, would immediately be construed as racism, especially for those of us on the right, Tea Party members and supporters, conservative Christians.
Juan is wise to speak up; it will take leadership in the black and Hispanic sectors to solve this problem. Because of PC attitudes that have developed since the 1990’s white support will not be easy. Nobody wants to be targeted for character assassination. We fought for equal rights for the black community in the 60’s as we listened to the music made possible by the entrepreneurial spirit and brilliance of Barry Gordy at Mowtown. What should have been the beginning of an explosion of black entrepreneurial business was blunted through the efforts of black activists and the while guilt folly of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society. The explosion of drug use and the sexual liberation movement were also debilitating factors but these were not confined to the black community.
The answer to the problem of black on black murder cannot be stricter gun control. This is a moral and social problem.
Here is a webpage and book that those interested in this subject and the historical human cost of gun control might like. Scroll down on the page for the chart:
See video of Chinese student who was at Tiananmen Square here:
Hot Air
The problem is not guns in it is deterioration of traditional American social and moral standards and values. I’m so glad Mr. Williams has the courage to speak out about this.
“The answer to the problem of black on black murder ….”
You will not be dissuaded, will you, from your obsession with “the other”? You pant after the distraction, in fact.
What is the answer to the problem of white suicide by gun? Or is the suicide, impulsive though he may be, something you choose not to concern yourself with?
Heartless, I would have to call that.
Libby: “You will not be dissuaded, will you, from your obsession with ‘the other’?”
Libby the subject was raised in an article by Juan Williams, a man of color. He used to be an NPR journalist until they dismissed him for daring to move a toe outside of the PC box. What IS your problem with discussing these issues. The problem is real.It is extraordinary and the statistics are horrendous.
You of all people should be aware that we at PS have spoken in such terms about society in general. Surely you are not denying the black on black murders are extremely high or that the problem of black and Mexican gang violence is a major problem in big cities? Or…maybe you are just too PC to bother yourself?
Heartless is turning away just because it’s uncomfortable to think about. Looking the other way is giving your approval of the behaviors and abandoning the people as less than. Don’t even attempt to deny it you have shared your opinions of “the dependent other” here many times.
You might try attending an Al-Anon meeting to learn a little something about the unlovely effects of being an enabler.