Updated PCE Price Index Shows Median Income Has Risen 20%

Posted by Tina

Certain economists and others have lamented that working Americans have been losing economic ground and are not as well of today as they have been in days gone by. Using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as a guide they insist that median incomes for working Americans have dropped by 2% since 1973. This has, no doubt, been behind recent union demands for a change in minimum wage to $15.00 an hour. But James Sherk, writing at The Foundry blog at The Heritage Foundation, cites a different measure, the measure preferred by the Congressional Budget Office and the Federal Reserve, that shows median household incomes have risen by 20% since 1973.

The CPI does not account for the fact that people change their buying habits when prices change—for example, Americans bought more smartphones when they became less expensive. Consequently, it overestimates the amount Americans spend on more expensive products.

The CPI also uses surveys that overestimate the amount Americans spend on rent, gas, and utilities—regularly recurring purchases easily remembered in interviews. The prices of these goods have grown faster than overall inflation. These problems artificially inflate the CPI.

The Department of Commerce uses a different methodology free from these problems to calculate the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index. Both the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office prefer the PCE. PCE-estimated inflation typically grows about 0.4 percentage points slower than CPI estimates. Over short periods of time, this hardly matters. Over long periods, it matters a lot.
Adjusting for inflation with the CPI shows median real household incomes stagnating, falling 2 percent between 1973 and 2011. The PCE paints a completely different picture.

The Commerce Department just revised the PCE to improve its accuracy. The old PCE showed median household incomes rising 17 percent between 1973 and 2011. The updated figures show median household income growing even more—up 20 percent.

Taking other changes into account—such as the growth of non-cash benefits and the drop in average household size—would show even larger gains. Researchers accounting for such factors find median incomes rising by 30-50 percent over the past generation. These findings accord with recent research showing that, contrary to popular belief, employees’ compensation has risen in tandem with their productivity. Middle-class households produce more and enjoy substantially higher standards of living today than they did four decades ago.

Sadly the PCE also shows that since 2007 median incomes have fallen by 7%. Still, overall this revelation is fantastic news. It offers a ray of hope, in this dismal Obama economy, that if policies in Washington were more business friendly (repeal and replace Obamacare-adopt smart tax policies), businesses and investors would celebrate and go for the gold again…the economy would take off! History indicates that instead of the part time low wage jobs created under Obama’s redistribution policies we would see a return to the robust expansion that always results in good paying jobs and a multitude of opportunity!
Democrats, always up to the same dirty tricks, have been telling Americans that capitalism is only for the rich and that working class Americans have been losing ground. Americans have been losing ground dramatically following this administrations redistribution, job killing policies, but it has not been true through the mostly positive decades under Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush.

Creating the perception that the rich got rich while the middle class lost ground and the poor got poorer was necessary to sell the American people on redistribution politics. The recession and the economic melt down offered radical Democrats a perfect crisis, a launching pad, to push this economic fallacy. The politically arranged Occupy Wall Street provided visual theatrics that were a constant reminder and was just part of the rich vs. poor theme. And didn’t the media oblige them with 24/7 coverage of the theme.

There is no denying that during this period wealthy people were able to increase their wealth. It is only logical that when conditions are favorable people with money to invest will realize great returns. Democrats shamefully pretend that this gain in wealth was money stolen and hidden away so that wages for working stiffs remained stagnant; it’s all a big deception of perceptions. Don’t be fooled.

Radical Democrats do politics this way because they cannot claim historical success for their economic policies. They do politics like this because Marxist redistribution, when presented truthfully and without theatrics and tricks is anti-American, a tough sell with voters. Since 1973 the policies Democrats prefer always lead to economic stagnation. Carter created the great malaise, Reagan created millions of jobs and a robust economy. Clinton did well only after cooperating with Republicans in the House. GHW Bush was roundly condemned for raising taxes after pledging, “No knew taxes”. George W. Bush erred by spending too much and failing to inspire Congress to enact changes that would have prevented the financial crisis. When policies that were consistent with conservative principles were in play Americans thrived. See here and here.

There are a number of big changes that need to take place to restore our nation to its founding principles and God knows, we support implementation of those changes. It is also apparent that both of the major political parties have serious problems. Both parties are guilty of promising what cannot be delivered, spending too much, and forgetting that the federal government was constituionally charged only to do a few basic things. These problems are separate issues that will require long term efforts by the electorate and a lot of education and pressure, to change. The economy, however, which represents the well-being of every American family is something else again. It is vitally important that we elect representatives and Congressmen that will work to enact policies that support business and the American worker and investor.

Please pay attention in the coming year and vote wisely, pilgrims!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Updated PCE Price Index Shows Median Income Has Risen 20%

  1. J. Soden says:

    CBU, Fed Reserve, Commerce Dept, Bureau of Labor Statistics are all beholdin’ to politicians in DC. And our debt recently didn’t move at all for several days! Unbelievable!

    More likely that Obumble’s gnomes have been fudging the numbers AGAIN.

  2. Tina says:

    Good news J., the debt ceiling war and resolution, negotiated by Boehner, includes spending caps and that is what is causing the slow down of our debt. Credit for good is never attributed to Republicans so we haven’t heard much about this…Dems haven’t figured a way to take credit yet or we would have!

    See here for details.

    Republicans are doing more than we think or hear about. It’s a good thing too!

  3. Chris says:

    Heritage has a vested interest in whitewashing income inequality. That is what they are paid to do. Why should we believe them when non-partisan agencies are reaching entirely different conclusions?

  4. Tina says:

    Why should anyone believe anyone Chris?

    You won’t get to certainty until you are willing to question what you believe to be true.

    Please, what evidence do you have that Heritage has a vested interest in “whitewashing” income inequality?

    Also you are always backing your own claims by using government entities such as CBO. So how do you resolve your criticism with the fact that the information from Heritage is based on a method preferred by both the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office?

    And on what basis do you determine that other sources are non-partisan or more non-partisan that Heritage?

    What about those who want to keep people voting Democrat and dependent on government programs, the left and left leaning non-profit think tanks, having a vested interest in withholding the Heritage information to fool uninformed or uneducated voters?

    I would take this discussion very seriously if I were you, Chris. You have been told, and/or have chosen to believe, that business people and people on the right are of one mind with a single motivation…they don’t care about poor and they want more money for themselves.

    No amount of time taken to educate you otherwise has resulted in your moving off your position. Others can’t think for you. Your future depends on getting things like this right. Think!

  5. Tina says:

    Thanks Peggy! What a remarkable letter!

    Let’s credit these guys just in case someone misses the hat tip at the bottom of the page at your link.

    Those young men and women are doing great work!

    Young Republicans

  6. Peggy says:

    Another Ray Steven’s hit.

    “Obama Budget Plan”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6TcpfBHlbs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.