Irresponsible Indoctrination Protests Have Serious Ugly Consequences ~ Police Officer Severly Injured ~ Students Chant, “Hit Him Again, Hit Him Again”

Posted by Tina

Recalling once again how during the sixties civil rights era our nation was admonished over and over again that hatred and racism have to be taught, it sickens me to watch our nations leader and other community leaders teach hatred and resentment. It sickens me further to read that, as a result of this irresponsible behavior, students in Colorado gleefully cheered like a crowd in a Roman Theater for the death of a police officer. The Conservative Treehouse has the story:

Liberal Indoctrination generates gleeful exhibition of hatred – A police officer remains in critical condition as a result of a Denver High School student #Ferguson protest walkout. Four officers responded to students marching down the street, as the officers tried to protect the students from traffic a motorist slammed into the police.

One officer was horrifically injured as his body was run over and dragged by a vehicle. Details now surface of the protesting students cheering the injury and chanting “hit him again, hit him again” while marching around the fallen officers. (video at link above)

Not all of the students were chanting and several of the march organizers later visited the severely injured officer in the hospital. Those that did chant for the driver of the car to, “hit him again,” are not only ignorant of the facts in the recent Brown/Garner high profile cases but have been indoctrinated to hate police officers, particularly white officers, and to believe that blacks are targeted unfairly. They are also being taught that this gives them the right to protest violently and that opinion, without regard to facts, is an acceptable alternative to the rule of law. It’s not surprising that young minds, already conditioned negatively about race, would soak up the Alinsky style messaging of the past few weeks of radical protest. John Perazzo of FrontPage magazine explains:

In his quest to cultivate the type of chaos that would spark social revolution against America’s capitalist system, Alinsky exhorted activists to constantly “rub raw the resentments of the people” and “fan the latent hostilities to the point of overt expression”—but to do this in measured tones, so as not to “scare off” middle-class Americans.

Thus did Obama dutifully and blandly call for “unity” and calm in the immediate aftermath of Michael Brown’s “heartbreaking and tragic” death, even as he repeatedly reminded us that: “police should not be bullying or arresting” anyone without cause; “in too many communities, too many young men of color are left behind and left as objects to fear”; “there is no excuse for excessive force by police”; “the justice gap” between whites and nonwhites is unacceptable; “the criminal-justice system doesn’t treat people of all races equally”; and “too many young men of color feel targeted by law enforcement, guilty of walking while black, or driving while black, judged by stereotypes that fuel fear and resentment and hopelessness.” And when the grand jury in Ferguson subsequently chose not to indict Darren Wilson because the officer obviously had shot Michael Brown in self-defense, Obama pronounced the black community’s indignation to be “an understandable reaction.”

Obama’s carefully chosen words—all delivered in the type of nonthreatening tenor advocated by Saul Alinsky—clearly communicated a single, foundational theme to African Americans: In the racist cesspool known as the United States, black people are routinely treated like second-class citizens, if not subhumans. Oh, and by the way, please remain calm. Wink, wink.

Alinsky also taught that in some cases activists must be completely willing—for the sake of the moral principles in whose name they profess to act—to turn up the proverbial heat and watch society descend into chaos and anarchy; to “go into a state of complete confusion and draw [their] opponent into the vortex of the same confusion.” “Wherever possible,” Alinsky counseled, “go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.” (continues)

This was not the way of civil rights leaders Martin Luther King or Gandhi who inspired him but it is the way of today’s radical race activists and it is the way of many teachers and professors on our nations high school and college campuses. Students today are regularly taught to see events in life through a distorted lens, to be angry and indignant over trumped up or imagined race (And sex/gender) scenarios. As we have found here on PS, some of them are so horrifically indoctrinated that no amount of reasoning or facts presented will penetrate to awaken them from their bigoted stupor. They view the world from an upside down perspective that has been carefully taught.

The work of fundamental transformation takes on many shapes and forms…this is but one of them. The damage to our nation will be great if we allow this insanity to continue. The majority of Americans, including police officers, are not racist. That radical minority that stirs up emotions based on lies, as we’ve seen in these recent cases, will dismiss this position as fantasy or the ravings of someone delusional. Those fighting for freedom and sanity for all in America, for the very soul of America,and against fundamental transformation can take consolation in the following quote:

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. ~ Mahatma Gandhi

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Irresponsible Indoctrination Protests Have Serious Ugly Consequences ~ Police Officer Severly Injured ~ Students Chant, “Hit Him Again, Hit Him Again”

  1. Chris says:

    “Thus did Obama dutifully and blandly call for “unity” and calm in the immediate aftermath of Michael Brown’s “heartbreaking and tragic” death, even as he repeatedly reminded us that: “police should not be bullying or arresting” anyone without cause; “in too many communities, too many young men of color are left behind and left as objects to fear”; “there is no excuse for excessive force by police”; “the justice gap” between whites and nonwhites is unacceptable; “the criminal-justice system doesn’t treat people of all races equally”; and “too many young men of color feel targeted by law enforcement, guilty of walking while black, or driving while black, judged by stereotypes that fuel fear and resentment and hopelessness.””

    Literally all of these are facts. What is wrong with stating facts?

    Also, how much is “some?” We have no idea how many kids said “hit him again.” Of course, even one saying it is horrible, but I’m a teacher–the fact that kids can be horrible is not exactly news. Why is this worth blogging about, but the lack of indictment for the cop who killed Eric Garner is not? What about the shooting of Tamir Rice, the 12 year old boy killed instantly by an officer for playing with a pellet gun at the park? Why hasn’t anyone here mustered up any outrage in those cases?

    I know why: because those cases contradict your narrative.

  2. Chris says:

    From the right-leaning “First Things” blog:

    “The number of deaths reported among law enforcement officers in 2013 is the lowest it has been in fifty-three years. The number of officers killed by gunfire last year was the lowest since 1887. In 2013, the number of police shootings of felony suspects, 461, was the highest figure in two decades, representing a consecutive increase over the last three years. Every year, we are on a course for more…”

    http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/12/death-by-police

    What do we really have to fear?

  3. Peggy says:

    The major difference between the 1960s protestors and today’s protestors is the 60s they were against president Nixon and the government. Today president Obama, his administraion and others are the protestor’s leaders.

    Is this what Anarchy looks like? Are we one step closer to

    Anarchy:
    “Anarchy refers to a society without a publicly enforced government.[1] When used in the negative sense, anarchy implies political disorder or lawlessness within a society. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon adopted the term in his 1840 treatise What Is Property? to refer to a new political philosophy, anarchism, which advocates stateless societies based on voluntary associations. Many anarchists, like Anselme Bellegarrigue, have complained that “[v]ulgar error has taken ‘anarchy’ to be synonymous with ‘civil war.'”[2]”

    Anarchism:
    “Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be immoral,[4][5] or alternatively as opposing authority in the conduct of human relations.[6][7][8][9][10][11] Proponents of anarchism (known as “anarchists”) advocate stateless societies based on what are sometimes defined as non-hierarchical organizations,[6][12][13] and at other times defined as voluntary associations.[14][15]”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy

    Are we on our way to tyranny?

    tyr·an·ny (tr-n)
    n. pl. tyr·an·nies

    1. A government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power.

    2. The office, authority, or jurisdiction of an absolute ruler.

    3. Absolute power, especially when exercised unjustly or cruelly: “I have sworn . . . eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man” (Thomas Jefferson).

    4.
    a. Use of absolute power.

    b. A tyrannical act.

    5. Extreme harshness or severity; rigor.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/tyranny

  4. Tina says:

    What’s wrong with stating facts?

    Context is everything; read the entire quote with the intention of getting what is being communicated.

    The deceitful use of good policy as pretty wrapping for an evil hidden agenda is not the same thing as a presenting a laundry list of ideas.

    My Lord some people are naive to the powers behind the movements they love. Ignorance, as they say, is bliss. It also seems to foster arrogance.

    An afterthought…the number of knock out victims has also increased over that same period. I wonder what else has increased…oh yeah, poverty, for one!

  5. Peggy says:

    Praying Rev. Gentry replaces Sharpton and Jackson as a leader for the black community in the steps of MLK’s nonviolent change.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmWAeJvFInQ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.