NO Spam – Spamming Here is Pointless

from Jack & Tina

We apologize if you have had trouble submitting your comments to older articles its because we’ve had to block them due to spammers.  For the current time we are restricting your comments to the last 6 articles so we can stay ahead of spammers.

Once the spammer figure out they can’t post here they will go away, but for now they are being persistent - they are slow to get the message!

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to NO Spam – Spamming Here is Pointless

  1. Peggy says:

    Thanks Jack and Tina for putting up with these jerks so we can enjoy this blog.

    Here’s a laugh for you. It’s hysterical. ROFLMAO!!

    “FIRST REPUBLICAN DEBATE HIGHLIGHTS: 2015” — A Bad Lip Reading of The Republican Debate

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufGlBv8Z3NU

  2. Pie Guevara says:

    Progressives, no doubt.

    Off Topic : This is a year late, but better late than never…

    “Exactly a century ago today, on 19 August 1914, Austria-Hungary suffered a shocking battlefield defeat at the hands of Serbia, delivering the Allies their first victory of the Great War.”

    http://20committee.com/2014/08/19/100-years-ago-the-first-allied-victory-of-world-war-i/

  3. Pie Guevara says:

    Of topic again …

    Beheaded Syrian scholar refused to lead Isis to hidden Palmyra antiquities
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/18/isis-beheads-archaeologist-syria

  4. Pie Guevara says:

    Off Topic Yet Again

    Just watched the first in a new science series. The Mystery of Matter : Search For The Elements on PBS. Absolutely outstanding! http://video.pbs.org/program/mystery-matter/

  5. Pie Guevara says:

    Off Topic Again

    This has an importance rating of 5 out of 5 in my book. From my friend Anthony Watts.

    Peer review is broken – Springer announces 64 papers retracted due to fake reviews
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/08/19/peer-review-is-broken-springer-announces-64-papers-retracted-due-to-fake-reviews/

    Yeah, right, “the science is settled.” Only to agenda driven non-scientist dopes.

  6. Pie Guevara says:

    This has become my off topic thread. Here is another. HEADS UP!

    There are two new science programs airing on KIXE PBS this week. Both are absolutely outstanding. One is the The Mystery of Matter and the other is Women in Chemistry: Lessons From Life and the Laboratory. The former appears to be a series, the later I cannot find on http://www.pbs.org but it may be a series too.

    Evidently there are four episodes of the The Mystery of Matter on KIXE being aired recently, check the schedule — http://www.kixe.org/
    Also look for Women in Chemistry: Lessons From Life and the Laboratory.

    Here is the link to , episodes of which can be viewed online — http://video.pbs.org/program/mystery-matter/

    The Mystery of Matter Episode 3: Into the Atom includes how “Glenn Seaborg created a new element that changes the world.” My father was one of Seaborg’s team and is credited for co-discovering Nobelium. (Creating, actually, since the half-life is so short none of it cannot be found naturally).

    Seaborg on Wikipedia — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_T._Seaborg
    Nobelium on Wikipedia — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobelium
    Dear ol’ Dad at Berkeley (on the right with the tobacco pipe), scroll down to Three of the Discoverers of Element 102: Ghiorso, Sikkeland, Walton, May 1958 http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/Exhibits/physics/extending02.html

  7. Pie Guevara says:

    Here I go off topic again. Like anyone ever reads this stuff.

    I guess this is something. The unindicted criminal Hillary Clinton not yet been criminally charged, but at least one judge had the balls to say her highness has violated “policy.”

    Judge says Hillary Clinton’s private emails violated policy
    http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/judge-says-hillary-clintons-private-emails-violated-policy-121568.html?hp=t2_r

    Will the DOJ and the FBI have the balls to charge and arrest her for violations of national security laws?

    Recently Hillary sported a bright orange pantsuit. Was that prescient? She should be sporting bright orange coveralls and full restraint chains while being walked into court. The sooner the better.

Comments are closed.