Common Core – Frustrated Dad in Ohio Issues Pointed Protest!

Posted by Tina

check in common core

I love people, they can be so creative! Daily Mail:

Fed up with Common Core, Doug Herrmann went for common sense.

The Ohio dad was sick and tired of not being able to help his son – who is in the second grade – do his homework, after his school adopted the controversial Common Core standard.

In order to make his point, Herrmann wrote a check to Milridge Elementary School in Plainesville, using Common Core numbers – a chart with x’s and 0’s – in order to show just how confusing the technique is.

Gotta love it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Common Core – Frustrated Dad in Ohio Issues Pointed Protest!

  1. Chris says:

    Well first, he didn’t even bother to do the method correctly; note the number of boxes on the two lines. They don’t match up with each other; he wrote two different dollar amounts.

    Second, this response was juvenile and teaches a bad lesson to our kids: when something is too hard for you, don’t try and learn it, just give up and say it’s stupid.

    Patheos had the perfect response to this celebration of ignorance:

    “Common Core isn’t the problem here.

    The problem is all the parents who immediately dismiss better, more effective ways of teaching math because it’s “different” from what they learned.

    If Herrmann doesn’t understand what his son is doing, then they should sit down together and work through it. Read the textbook. Go to Google. Ask the teacher for help. Any of those things would have helped and none of them would have taken very long.

    Instead, Herrmann wasted everyone’s time by writing a useless check and putting it on Facebook.

    Because, to people like him, ignorance is hilarious. He’d rather see his son learn math the old-fashioned way, putting him in danger of struggling in his math career as he gets older, instead of course-correcting early in his education when everything is still fresh.

    To answer the obvious rebuttal, yes, a lot of adults are able to get through the day just fine even though they were never very good at math. But why wouldn’t they want their children to aim higher, understand things better, and think more critically?

    I’m not a shill for Common Core. I’m just someone who understands what it is, unlike Doug Herrmann, who couldn’t explain it to you if he tried.

    Dave Powell at Education Week has it exactly right:

    [Common Core is] not a conspiracy to make your kids dumb; it’s actually a conspiracy to make your kids smart… It’s about helping them work confidently with numbers and mathematical concepts so they don’t have to go through life with a cheat sheet hidden in their back pockets. It may not look that way to parents who are struggling to decipher the homework their children bring home, but if we commit to teaching math this way we can actually change the way people think.

    I spent seven years teaching high school math. I’m a National Board Certified Teacher. I’ve written multiple posts explaining this “new” math (that really isn’t new at all).

    I’m telling you this new way is so much better for students, but we need parents willing to get on board with it instead of complaining because it looks weird.

    At the very least, it sends the wrong message to really impressionable kids.”

  2. Pie Guevara says:

    Re : “I’m not a shill for Common Core.”

    Yes you are.

  3. J. Soden says:

    Common Core reminds me of an “experiment” in teaching reading in the 50’s. (Oops, I’m dating myself)
    I was taught to read using the phonics method and spouse was taught to “sight read” and still has a hard time sounding out an unfamiliar word. Not sure which method is taught today, but if it’s the “sight” then it’s no wonder we are turning out students that can’t spell – even using Spellcheck!

  4. Tina says:

    I think the parent was just using humor to express his frustration. It’s a joke and so it matters not if the little boxes are exactly right…most Americans wouldn’t know the difference anyway since they weren’t taught with the CC method.

    The transition for older kids is causing them frustration. Young kids doing math this way may do okay in the future but it’s causing parents trying to help their kids a lot of frustration. Schools complain that parents need to get involved and then the powers that be throw up roadblocks!

    Educators had a fit that No Child Left Behind created standards that forced teachers to teach for the test. My contention was that if they were doing a thorough job of teaching the material the students would pass the test.

    Common Core is now being criticized in many ways but one of the common complaints is that teachers have to teach for the test.

    Education bureaucrats, and now industry moguls, have navel gazed to “perfect” education for decades and entire generations of kids are failing in greater numbers. Maybe we should get back to basics, give more power to local school districts, teachers, and parents, and see what happens. I have a feeling the kids would do better.

    Articles of interest:

    How Common Core Standards Kill Creative Teaching

    The Battle Against Common Core:

    Largely a product of the 2009 stimulus plan Democrats passed in congress, the Initiative is a bureaucratic, top-down program heavily influenced by special interests. The Obama administration encouraged the states’ adoption of this initiative by providing incentives through his Race to the Top program. The program was $4.35 billion dollars of carrots swinging in front of fifty hungry rabbits.

    The new standards are indeed tougher than many currently in place, but there is also the danger of states being disincentivized from ever raising standards beyond the initiative.

    More dangerous still is the misplaced emphasis on common mass learning. Children do not fully “learn” through memorization. Drilling children until they memorize the curriculum may help them pass a test but rarely results in true understanding. Furthermore each child is different, and strictly teaching the “common core” will only impede exceptional students from reaching beyond the mediocre.

    In his article “Do We Need a Common Core?” Nicholas Tampio states the problem quite succinctly. “The class… has gone from one where teachers, aides, parents, and students work hard to create a rewarding educational experience, to one where the teachers and students use materials designed by a major publishing house.”

    In short, responsibility has shifted from the classroom to educational bureaucrats. Incentives to be creative in the classroom have disappeared.

    Central planning by the new world order anyone?

    • Chris says:

      Tina, I see the problems mentioned above as having more to do with the choices of individual districts. There is nothing in Common Core that requires schools to focus on rote memorization, to get materials from publishing houses, or to teach to the test to a degree that didn’t exist prior to implementation. My district has been implementing Common Core for years, and the majority of the material I use in the classroom is made by either myself or someone else in my department. The last district I worked for did almost nothing but test prep, the teachers had to teach much more lock-step than before, and the transition to Common Core actually spurred slightly more creativity rather than less. Common Core is just a set of standards, which are readily available online to anyone:

      http://www.corestandards.org/

      Sure there may be incentives to use certain materials but that is still a choice. Perhaps I’m spoiled since I’m a California teacher and my district is one of the highest paying in the state, so maybe we just haven’t had the need to take up those incentives. It could be different in other states.

  5. Pie Guevara says:

    Re “My district has been implementing Common Core for years, and the majority of the material I use in the classroom is made by either myself or someone else in my department.”

    That is the best argument for Common Core I have ever seen.

  6. Harold says:

    Sort of reminds me of the Ebonics craze as legitimized by a Oakland School District:
    Ebonics Phrases (which basically just raised certain teachers salaries who became proficient in it) So would any concerned English Major would want his PEEPS to graduate with “creds” speaking this street slang. Come on folks lets be keepin’ it real!
    Yo – Hello
    Sup? – How are you?
    Dope/Dizzle – good
    Off da hook/hizzle/hizza – very good
    Whack/Whizzle – bad
    Da Kronik – good weed
    Peeps – people
    Ni/Nizzle/Nizza – Man/friend
    Dawg/Dizzle/Dizza – Man/friend
    Beeatsh – Woman/female friend
    Ho/Hizzle/Hizza – Woman/female friend
    Pimp’d up/out- well dressed
    Ride/Rizzle/Rizza – Car
    5-0 – Police
    phat – good
    Fly – good
    Supafly – very good
    don’t be trippin’ – Do not be anxious (a difficult word to translate)
    keepin’ it real – keeping things in prespective to reality
    shortiez – children
    livin’ it large – living a prosperous life
    chicken head – ugly woman
    pigeon – ugly woman
    papers – money
    to smoke – to shoot
    to bust a cap – to shoot

  7. Tina says:

    Good response Harold!

    AARP:

    In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States had the best-educated young people in the world, or pretty close to it. But a disturbing new report from the Council on Foreign Relations says that the generations who’ve followed the boomers haven’t been able to maintain that global edge – and that, as a result, America’s ability to compete economically is suffering as well.

    The council, a nonpartisan think tank whose 4,700 members include such luminaries as journalist Fareed Zakaria and actress-activist Angelina Jolie, notes that among people ages 55 to 64, Americans rank first in the percentage who’ve earned high school degrees and third in those who’ve earned college and graduate degrees. But Americans ages 25 to 34 only rank 10th in the world in high school diplomas, and they’ve dropped to 13th in attaining post-secondary degrees.

    Students First:

    The literacy rates among fourth grade students in America are sobering. Sixty six percent of all U.S. fourth graders scored “below proficient” on the 2013 National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) reading test, meaning that they are not reading at grade level.1 Even more alarming is the fact that among students from low-income backgrounds, 80 percent score below grade level in reading.2

    Reading proficiency among middle school students isn’t much better. On the 2013 NAEP reading test, about 22 percent of eighth graders scored below the “basic” level, and only 36 percent of eighth graders were at or above grade level.3

    In the growing global marketplace, students will need to excel in both math and science to compete internationally as engineers, scientists, physicians, and creative entrepreneurs. Yet, in a 2012 analysis of student performance on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), the U.S. placed 27th out of 34 countries in math performance and 20th in science performance.4

    I’ve read that America has never ranked high in the world standings. If this is true, then our further falling in the standings since the 70’s is even more troubling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.