Posted by Tina
Evidence of Hillary Clinton’s corruption as Secretary of State continues to fall out. A story at Circa reveals that Hillary pressured the Prime Minister of Bangladesh in order to help a Clinton Foundation donor:
While secretary of state, Hillary Clinton made a personal call to pressure Bangladesh’s prime minister to aid a donor to her husband’s charitable foundation despite federal ethics laws that require government officials to recuse themselves from matters that could impact their spouse’s business.
The Office of Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina confirmed to Circa that Mrs. Clinton called her office in March 2011 to demand that Dr. Muhammed Yunus, a 2006 Nobel Peace prize winner, be restored to his role as chairman of the country’s most famous microcredit bank, Grameen Bank. The bank’s nonprofit Grameen America, which Yunus chairs, has given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative. Grameen Research, which is chaired by Yunus, has donated between $25,000 and $50,000, according to the Clinton Foundation website.
Did we dodge a bullet when she lost the presidential race or what!
If anyone other than a Clinton had pulled the garbage $hrilLIARy and Bubba have, they’d already be behind bars.
Hello, AG Sessions? Mr. Comey and Loretta Lynch didn’t want to look at the Bubba Foundation, but YOU certainly can!
You’re right J and I’ll bet there are more than a few prosecutors in NY with information that will assist.
OK now……………………………They are all going down, you know I am 100% pissed about the foundation corruption over the years, and the Clinton corruption……..
time to look back at the conversations we had decades ago about these political induced foundations.
The real story right now is the business dealings under investigation, In the end they all fall down party will not matter
The house of cards is crumbling
Time to get real about corruption and the laws allowing foreign money to corrupt
We are in a big mess
Republican? NO
Democrat? NO
Awake? YES!
Alternative?
Tina
There are more people that do not affiliate with either party than people in either party
Vote for the best candidate regardless of party is the answer.
Find honest candidates who want to work for We the People not Multinational Corporations and their wall Street Profits
This is not a football game. Controlled Opposition Elections ran by the donor class where everybody looses?
There are also a lot of people that never bother to vote but will answer a poll. And 22 states allow people to register with no party affiliation.
I do agree that both parties have been bleeding members. It makes people feel better to turn their backs on those that have failed them.
Wikipedia:
The question comes down to how the American people vote. Do they lean toward the right or the left? Currently the public is voting Republican (right) all across the nation. Republicans hold the presidency, the Senate (52-46-2), the House (241-194), governorships (33-16-1), State Senates (35-12-3), State Houses (31-17-1), governorships (31-18-1). You have 2 Independents in the Senate and one Independent governor…woo hoo. In the Washington and New York Senates Republicans and Independent Democrats are working together. In Alaska the three parties are all working together (amazing!)
Do you notice a pattern here that belies your assertion of Independent strength?
When we vote for a candidate we also vote for what that candidate will do in terms of legislation. It all comes down to the ideals and policies favored by the two parties.
What is the independent platform?
Is it just hatred for big corporations?
If so you don’t have anything to offer voters that is different or better than the two parties. (Bernie Sanders was just a far left loose canon)
Those who run the Democrat Party seem to really love the big corporate ties they have. They’ve gone beyond dialing for campaign dollars and vowed to “take over” industries with the goal of single party rule. (fascism) They work to control the oil industry with crippling regulation and subsidies that favor anything other than oil or nuclear. The health insurance companies cooperated with the government to give them control in exchange for more business. It backfired. Government control has crippled our nations economy.
To my knowledge companies that support Republicans coordinate for less government control and sensible fair regulation. (freedom)
What do Independents stand for?
Why don’t they win elections?
Bad mouthing companies that contribute so much to this country probably isn’t the answer. Corporations and businesses big and small create jobs, a broad tax base, growth and opportunity, security, investment opportunity, loans to purchase cars, homes, boats, and investment real estate. They put their own money at risk to grow the economy and create products Americans and others want to buy.
How else can people climb the ladder of success if not through a broad and expanding business environment?
If you have some secret alternate idea I’d like to hear it.
The corruption you hate lies with the politician whose duty is to the people and who compromises that duty when he offers favors for monetary support. Desperate men do that. As long as we are duped into condemning the party instead of holding individuals responsible, it will only get worse. It’s lazy to lay a blanket of blame on both parties.
A big problem is the unreliability and activism of the justice system. Another is activism within the various departments. A third is activism in the media.
I submit the problems with corruption in the parties would improve greatly if we had a media willing to be nonpartisan warriors in search of the facts.
Tina … is the Clinton Global Initiative … Bill’s checking account?
I think you will find … not.
Hils was interceding in foreign political shenanigans. That was her job. Supposing this guy was doing a good job at the microbank? She should not intercede?
The fact is you know nothing about any of this. You only know what your prejudicial sources feed you.
Try reading “Clinton Ca$h” by Peter Schweitzer. No prejudice, just facts.
That is, of course, if facts matter to you . . . . . . .
Oh please, Libby. Before Bill and Hill got to Washington they didn’t have a pot to pee in.
The Clintons are the Global Initiative just like they are the Clinton Foundation. They live as jet setters and schmoozers on the accounts of both. They have no problem living large on the backs of their donors.
And there’s quite a bit of evidence pointing to fraud at the Global Initiative:
They’re either running a massive fraud or they are very very bad at running a charitable organization. It could be the latter, they’ve always been a couple preferring symbolism to substantive results. But I wouldn’t bet that fraud wasn’t the original plan. A charity scam is the perfect vehicle for spending your days (and nights) rubbing elbows with the worlds elites. (Hillary couldn’t wait to scrape that Arkansas mud off he shoes)
Clarice Feldman at The American Thinker chronicles Clinton and Clinton associate ties to Russia, failures to disclose, conflict of interest foundation donations for Hillary, and more:
Please share with us evidence of ANY ties to Russia, Russian businesses or banking, or government officials that has even a hint of impropriety.
My “prejudicial media” has come up with two money making ventures. The Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and the sale of a home in Florida to a Russian. Both occurred openly and publicly and both prior to his running for office.
Your media has insinuated in various ways that there is more despite the fact that investigations have turned up zot. So who’s media is more “prejudicial?”
Worth a read:
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/13/scholar-unravels-the-big-lie-surrounding-the-tump-campaign-and-russian-collusion-video/
Certainly explains a LOT!