Posted by Tina
Remember the cadet who wore a Che Guevera t-shirt under his uniform and flashed the inside of his lid with the message, “Communism Will Win” for a graduation photo? Apparently his activism has been quite extensive on social media and the Army has had enough:
Eight months after his communist social media postings and conduct caused a conservative media firestorm, 2nd Lieutenant Spenser Rapone (better known as “the commie cadet”) is reportedly being processed out of the Army with the most severe type of military administrative discharge — an “other than honorable discharge.”
Rapone, you may recall, is the avowed Marxist and Antifa supporter who posted pictures of himself on social media promoting pro-communist messages and expressing an intention to infiltrate the U.S. military.
I thought you’d like to know.
To bad he was not wearing a Pie Guevara T-Shirt.
Interesting …
https://sofrep.com/90929/calls-coming-inside-house-americas-communist-insider-threat/
More factual, and considered, than what you get off PJ Media, anyway.
If he was wearing a Pie Guevara tee shirt he would probably have been promoted. However, he wore the wrong tee shirt and now I’m sad we wasted so much time and money on this guy. There are so many highly deserving people that would have given anything to become a West Point cadet and this fool took up one of those rare opportunities. Well, I glad he’s gone, but I’m disturbed that he made it to graduation before he was caught. There should be some reprimands coming for people that allowed him to slip by for so long.
Re : “More factual, and considered, than what you get off PJ Media, anyway.”
Which explains all the Post Scripts followers flocking to you blog, Lippy.
A good article Libby…except for the one paragraph (again, seeking equivalence)
It may be that not all democrats are (or see themselves as) communists. But there’s plenty of evidence that most speak and act as communists would. Most supported the man seeking a “fundamental transformation” of America that would in time, if left undeterred, create a communist state. (Democrats actively sought a permanent one party nation…Democrat)
WND (2013) featured a review of the book, “The Enemies Within,” by New Zealander Trevor Loudon, “…which documents how extensively communists, socialists and progressives have penetrated the U.S. Congress, running on the Democratic Party ticket.”
More from former radical communist, David Horowitz, here:
Every program or plan the Democrats embrace is imbued with Marxist principles.
On the other hand, Republicans, especially the freedom centered new line of Republicans, propose policies in line with the Constitution and our founding principles. No one in the party now has associated with any Nazi or Marxist (socialist) group or person in America to my knowledge, although Democrats try to make the association wide-spread with their labeling and misquoting schemes.
I do agree with Horowitz that old guard Republicans won’t acknowledge the Democrats association with communism and the principles of Marx. They have been fearful and feckless. They failed to talk over the dem supportive media and trust the American people. Until the Tea Party rise they had little reason to trust…now they should! And some are probably just as ignorantly wrapped in the feel good notions of Marx as are many rank and file democrats.
“(Democrats actively sought a permanent one party nation…Democrat)”
And to which deluded perversion of our political history, exactly, do you refer?
November 2008, Politico, “Dems talk of ‘permanent progressive majority’”
May 2011, Huffington Post, “How Democrats Might Actually Build a Permanent Majority”
Amazon books, “Permanently Blue: How Democrats Can End the Republican Party and Rule the Next Generation”
Dec 2017, Huffington Post, “Permanent Democratic Majority: New Study Says Yes”
(Hillary was a shoe in and organizations and big left coast corporate execs were on board) …Frontpage Magazine (link incomplete – page not accessible-donation wall):
Apparently the US Chamber of Commerce had candidates in the running with that goal in mind!
Oct 2015, Conservative Review, “Report: Limitless immigration creating permanent Dem majority”
When you pay close attention you spot these things.
And from two sources you are sure to poo poo…
NewsMax, “Obama-Clinton Goal Was to Create a Permanent Democratic Majority”
<blockquoteThe Obama-Clinton-Democrat takeover of America involves two major initiatives: societal and governmental.
The societal initiatives included:
1. Infiltrating the important non-governmental institutions of society with Clinton-Obama supporters. For example, the Catholic Church leadership opposed a portion of the Obama policies. Hillary’s response was: we need to put our own people in the leadership positions of the church. Other examples of this infiltration, while not so deliberate, are the near total domination by Democrats of mass communication and the education system.
2. Weaken nongovernmental institutions or drive them out of existence. For example, private charitable organizations are competition for a government aspiring to be the people’s savior and protector. The left opposes permitting the private sector to do almost anything that can be taken over by government.
3. The threat and actual use of intimidating violence in the streets by organizations that burn and pillage and injure.
4. Operating a shadow organization 365 days a year to keep the pressure on society and government. The Clinton Foundation closely fits this model. The Foundation employees were still on the Clinton payroll while holding offices in the government.
The governmental initiatives include:
1. Government offices, historically neutral, become aggressive forceful agents that can infiltrate all aspects of society and suppress any opposition.
2. Using government to surveille everyone, gathering information that could be used against anyone who opposes the leaders. The hit film, “The Lives of Others” (2006) about the East German secret police, provides an understanding of the pernicious impact of surveillance.
3. Control the election process. Opposition is suppressed and abused with a two pronged approach: (i) use government to curb the activities of opposition, and (ii) flood the nation with immigrants, legal and illegal, who are believed to be likely Democratic voters.
4. Unfortunately a case can be made to explain the light touch of the Democratic axis even to deal with terrorists entering the United States. The more terrorists, the larger the number of government employees required to shadow and monitor the terrorists — thus a growth in government, and there is the added bonus of a massive, unchallengeable need for surveillance.
Had Hillary won the 2016 election, Republicans would have had no chance to win a future election. What Obama, Hillary and the Democrats were creating was a totalitarian mass movement and a totalitarian party (remember Hillary had control of the Democratic Party) that ultimately would have resulted in a totalitarian rule. What the Obama-Hillary Axis was doing resembles the information in William Kornhauser’s classic book, “The Politics of Mass Society,” in which he considers the transitions of a free society to a totalitarian one.
There’s a reaso you all thought Hillary was a shoe in whether or not you consciously knew about actions and motivations to create permanency.
Sept 2014, American Thinker, “The Plot to Create a Permanent Democratic Majority”
And the beat goes on….
None of this contemplates the obliteration of the Republican, or any other, political party. Tina, your paranoia gets the better of you intellect … again.
Your arrogance trips you up again! When you can’t refute what I’ve said you resort to insults. Why is it so hard to relax and expand your awareness and knowledge?
I didn’t address the state of the Republican party or any other. However, if your party managed to fulfill its plan, the other parties would exist in a permanent wilderness void of any power.
I was talking about the plans members of your party had to permanently dominate politically and, through legislation and the courts, create complete government control of industry…which would be the end of our Constitutional republic.
No paranoia here but I do notice what the radicals that have taken over your party are up to and have been up to for many decades.
Yes, paranoia. Hoping to achieve a majority, to win an election … IS NOT to wish death upon the other party. It’s your own fault if your policies and positions will not sustain a majority for any length of time, nobody else’s.
If you think it is some wicked conspiracy, you are paranoid. In fact, the only party that actively tries to restrict access to polling places is … altogether now … The Republican Party of America!
And if you’re not being paranoid, you’re being dangerous. Did you really think that the opposition was just going to collapse when Trump took office? Did you collapse when the O-man scaled the heights? You did not. You bought out the nation’s stock of ammunition, that’s what you did. It’s a wonder is man is still with us.
WE … are having a high old time in the nation’s courts!
http://www.cnn.com/2018/06/14/politics/new-york-lawsuit-trump-foundation/index.html
I can’t help it … gloat, gloat, gloat!