What Obama Will Do If He Becomes Our President – A Fun Look Back

“He will show us why we were chanting “Yes We Can” by ignoring all ignorance of the racist and people who only think of themselves. He also we make this country look smarter by bringing our soldiers home instead waisting amunition money and lives and save them for when something really does happen. Then to top it all off he will finally do something about the less fortunate citizens of America and try to make us more equal.” Anonymous (source Wiki-Answers).


The recession ended in 2009, but it doesn’t feel like it and 2012 is right around the corner. We’re still in Iraq and Afghanistan and we’ve become involved in Libya too. While helping our Libyan friends, they thanked us by attacking our embassy and they burnt it to the ground. The poor in the USA is now greater than at any time in the past 20 years. Our national debt is now over $40,000 on every man, woman and child. The Obama’s spending on their travel for one year exceed what any 5 average workers will earn in a lifetime. The cost of education has skyrocketed and many good students have dropped out because it’s too expensive. The United States has dropped to 5th place among the world nations for business/ economics. There have been no meaningful reforms to waste, fraud or abuse by Congress. The border is still unsecured with miles upon miles where anyone can cross at will. Illegal drugs are rampant. FEMA is nearly broke and we’ve seen the first time a president failed to produce a budget for Congress.

That’s what Obama has done – was it close to what you thought he would do?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to What Obama Will Do If He Becomes Our President – A Fun Look Back

  1. Harold Ey says:

    He did say that didn’t he!
    He was elected wasn’t he
    He hasn’t done it ! has he.
    So what has he done other than attempt to divide this country’s population by turning the Have’s and have Not’s, against one another, and he almost got away with it, using a totally bias Democratic Congress and Administration. Which created the need of Tea Party Americans, (which you should give credit to Obama & Congress for that) a Constitutional believing group of concerned Americans not willing to allow the continued disregard and trampling of Our Constitution. Also they realized the results of Americas financial decline due to excessive spending as a result of a Congress without PROCESS supervision. A lot of people on the left dislike the the Tea Party, a lot of people on the right dislike Obama, thankfully any concerned American dislike the direction of decline and dissension Obama has created. So far all Obama has proven is a desire to divide this country’s populous and a exemplary use of meaningless words.

  2. Tina says:

    Although I didn’t know all of the specifics, in terms of the bad economy, yes, this is what I knew would be the result of electing an inexperienced personality with a spread the wealth agenda.

    I was surprised by some of his early decisions on the war. Then I reconsidered. The enemy we face is not something George Bush made up to fuel the militaryindustrialcomplex. The enemy is real, the potential for a much deadlier attack is real, the methods for fighting this enemy must be multifaceted, and unfortunately we’ll be at this for a long time. Also, Guantanamo was the best solution in a difficult, unprecidented situation. Obama had no other choice but to continue…”closing Gitmo” and “bringing the troops home” were a campaign promises bound to end in failure.

  3. Pie Guevara says:

    Obama has done pretty much what I thought he was going to do — make things much worse at an accelerated rate.

  4. Post Scripts says:

    Quentin, wow, now that was a very thoughtful reply and I appreciate reading it.

    Thanks for the Atlantic chart.

  5. Tina says:

    Tricky chart, Q, but about what one would expect from the sicophant New York Times, it’s actual source. The chart is pure spin.

    Conveniently, it ignores tax revenues (or lack thereof) and gross domestic product, which, when considered, offer a more accurate picture of Obama’s wisdom (or lack thereof) regarding spending (and new expensive legislation).

    Factcheck.org has a chart and a very informative article.

    http://factcheck.org/2010/07/geithners-gdp-whopper/

    The administrations own estimates project spending next year that is higher as a percentage of the economy than in any year since the end of World War II. The average projected by Obamas budget officials is significantly higher than the average under Reagan or Bush (father or son)

    Geithner: [The president has] proposed to freeze discretionary spending, to keep the overall size of the government at a very modest level as a share of our economy. If you look again at what the presidents proposing, he keeps the overall size of government at a very modest level comparable tolower than what was in the Bush administration, comparable to what President Reagan presided over. Thats very important.

    Thats not true, as a glance at this chart shows. It reflects official historical spending figures as a share of the nations economic output, as measured by gross domestic product (or GDP), plus the very latest estimates of current and future spending produced by Obamas own Office of Management and Budget.

    According to the Mid Session Review released by the OMB on July 23 two days before Geithner spoke the Obama administration is proposing federal spending for next fiscal year equal to 25.1 percent of GDP. That would be the highest since 1945, the last year of World War II, when it was 41.9 percent. (See table 1.2, page 24).

    New spending isn’t quite as crucial if the economy is humming, people have jobs and tax revenues are flowing in, but when the economy has tanked, businesses are failing, unemployment is high and tax revenues are not flowing new spending and projected new spending is downright STUPID! Any housewife with a checkbook can tell you that!

    And that’s not all. Projected spending, as a percentage of GDP because of the health care laws places us in the same neighborhood as Greece!

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/26/cbos-2020-vision-debt-will-rise-to-90-of-gdp/

    The federal public debt, which was $6.3 trillion ($56,000 per household) when Mr. Obama entered office amid an economic crisis, totals $8.2 trillion ($72,000 per household) today, and its headed toward $20.3 trillion (more than $170,000 per household) in 2020, according to CBOs deficit estimates.

    That figure would equal 90 percent of the estimated gross domestic product in 2020, up from 40 percent at the end of fiscal 2008. (emphasis mine)

    Interest on that debt will be higher than what we now pay for our entire military…JUST THE INTEREST PAYMENT!

    YES GWB allowed too much spending but those who were hypercritical of him then cannot be taken seriously if they do not now criticize the direction that this administration and it’s super majority congress have taken in the midst of a financial and economic crisis.

    If we make changes in key entitlement programs, if we tighten our belts in general, if we trash the complicated, expensive Obamacare and write a few laws that will fix the few health care issues that need to be adressed, if we give our business community a green light to rev up the economy by lowering or eliminating tax burdens, we MIGHT have a chance at avoiding a third world reality of poverty and stagnation.

    “Afghanis burned our embassy and you blame Obama for sending troops to Afghanistan?”

    Nay, nay…it was Obama’s air strikes:

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2010/11/number-of-afghan-air-strikes-highest-ever/

    Remember how last months air strike numbers raised eyebrows because they had spiked to 700 in the month of September? Well, the Air Force has released Octobers statistics and continuing with this years upward trend, the number of airstrikes rose to 1,000 last month. Thats the highest single month total ever in the air war in Afghanistan, the previous high had been 984 in June, 2008. The September percentage increase over the same month a year ago was an eye-popping 172 percent, but this time around the difference between Octobers is 52 percent because there were 660 strikes last October. The Air Force uses the term weapons releases to describe when US and NATO aircraft drop bombs on enemy targets or use their guns to provide combat support for ground troops. Overall, the 26,948 combat missions (sorties) this year has already overtaken last years number of 26,474. The number of airstrikes began to trend upward earlier this year in May and June when Gen. McChrystal was still in charge of NATO forces in Afghanistan. When he took command the year before, McChrystal had placed restrictions on the use of airstrikes if civilians were nearby. He did this in an effort to turn around negative Afghan public opinion that had soured on NATO because of incidents where airstrikes targeting Taliban targets had also resulted in civilian casualties.

    Quentin you just can’t run from the FACT that Obama has been president for nearly three years now and Dems had Congress for two years before that…spending, the economy and war now BELONG TO THEM!

    Idiots don’t care to make a distinction between corporitists and corporate citizens…all guilty si lazy but so much easier…and makes him seem so god like in his own mind!

    Funny some of the same people can’t make the distinction between an Islamist terrorist and a peaceful Muslim either.

  6. Libby says:

    “The recession ended in 2009, but it doesn’t feel like it and 2012 is right around the corner.”

    And if were gonna take a double dip, it will be laid entirely at the feet of the freshman class of 2010.

  7. Tina says:

    “And if were gonna take a double dip, it will be laid entirely at the feet of the freshman class of 2010.”

    You still haven’t made the corellation. How do you lay it at their feet?

  8. Messi jersey says:

    Audio started playing anytime I opened up this web site, so irritating!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.