Eastwood Delights at RNC Convention

Posted by Tina

Ed Timperlake over at The American Thinker had the best observations about Clint Eastwood’s performance! My favorite bit:

Americans can hear hard messages coming from Clint. He has a certain immunity that comes with being old and beloved. Yes, some of his sentences did not complete themselves. Yes, he was a bit doddering. And yes, his F yourself jokes were crude. Grandpa sometimes embarrasses the family at birthdays and anniversaries by bringing up uncomfortable topics. But everyone also loves Grandpa, and realizes he tells the truth because he hasn’t got that much longer with us, and doesn’t give a damn anymore what people think. The one thing everyone remembers about the party afterward is when Grandpa mentioned the adultery, the grandkid who did drugs, or the other secrets that everyone prefers to keep their mouths shut about.

There are lots of truths about President Obama — including that he really isn’t such a nice guy — that the media will not allow consideration of. Except from Grandpa.

Clint Eastwood topped off a sparkling lineup of speakers at the RNC Convention. Was there a group that wasn’t well represented over the last three days? I don’t think so…the Republican Party does indeed have a big tent.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Eastwood Delights at RNC Convention

  1. RHT447 says:

    Well done, Mr. Eastwood, well done. The cherry on top was the cut-away at the end of his speech to news anchors Brian Williams and Andrea Mitchell. Ms. Mitchell was so furious she could barely contain herself, and Mr. Williams (for a brief moment) looked like he was sitting next to a live hand grenade.

  2. Chris says:

    I’ve always liked Clint Eastwood. He is a good actor and an even better director. “Gran Torino” was amazing. I’m not quite sure what he is doing in the Republican party–last I checked, he was pro-marriage equality, pro-choice, and anti-war.

    But this speech was just embarrassing, and mostly served to provide comedic fodder. Many have likened his rambling speech to that of a drunk uncle at Thanksgiving. “Eastwooding,” in which people take pictures and videos of themselves arguing with empty chairs, has already become a huge Internet meme.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/eastwooding-inspires-social-media-users-upload-empty-chair-pics-clint-eastwood-speech-article-1.1148602

    Jamelle Bouie put it best: “This is a perfect representation of the campaign: an old white man arguing with an imaginary Barack Obama.”

    https://twitter.com/jbouie/statuses/241357291671138305

  3. Tina says:

    RHT447 I missed that…dang!

    Its an ugly sight…all these hard core leftists running around with their hair on fire. But you know it had to be a shocking visual…smiling brown faces, some of them strong and accomplished women, one or two of them Democrats and ex Democrats talking with conviction about the things that matter to “old white men” as if our very lives depended on it.

  4. Harold Ey says:

    Chris writes; I’ve always liked Clint Eastwood. He is a good actor and an even better director. “Gran Torino” was amazing. I’m not quite sure what he is doing in the Republican party–last I checked, he was pro-marriage equality, pro-choice, and anti-war.
    Chris, Clint may still believe in all of the above ideals, but he isn’t a fool. The mans speech you attempt to belittle is just the groundwork of realization as more 2008 voters have started to catch on to their mistake of voting for Obama. Clint’s delivery may not have been the best in his career, but the message was on point. Obama is a “empty chair” when it gets down to the fundamental values that help build America.

  5. Chris says:

    They don’t look “furious” to me, they look confused and uncomfortable. Mitchell was right, that speech was one of the strangest moments in politics I’ve ever seen, and Eastwood did misrepresent some of the facts. Look outside of the conservative echo chamber and you’ll see a lot of people agree.

  6. Tina says:

    Outside the so-called conservative echo chamber you find the left-wing Obama swooning propaganda bubble. Mitchell and Williams are cheerleading rather than engaging in journalism. The amusing thing is that they believe they are invisible. Here’s some of Mitchels unbiased snarky reporting:

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/08/27/andrea_mitchell_gop_convention_dealing_with_oversized_egos.html

    “And Democrats, we should point out, have a challenge, a political challenge here with this approaching storm, especially for the Republicans. No one here can easily forget the iconic picture of President Bush flying on Air Force One looking out the window and looking down at New Orleans during Katrina. They’re not going to forget that,” the NBC correspondent said.

    Democrats…”we”? Ms. Mitchell has obviously forgotten she’s not entertaining friends around her dinner table!

    Here’s more:

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/21/andrea_mitchell_romney_has_been_getting_a_free_ride_from_the_media.html

    NBC’s Andrea Mitchell says the media has given Mitt Romney a “free ride” by not dwelling on how long it took for his former primary rivals to formally endorse him.

    Mitchell says the media has always laid off of examining Romney’s record and the clash between the elements that make up the Republican party.

    “They believe that the Bain Capital record is their best argument against Mitt Romney,” NBC’s Andrea Mitchell said about the Obama campaign.

    “What you pointed out in your opening segment, and the lead in to the Cory Booker interview, was that the media have not really dwelled on how many of these Republicans are not endorsing Mitt Romney in a very, how would you describe the way they’ve been endorsing Mitt Romney? An elevator closing on — George W. Bush,” Andrew Mitchell said to MSNBC primetime host Rachel Maddow.

    “So that has been sort of a leitmotif, but not a hammer,” Mitchell observed. “That’s a really mixed metaphor, but you know what I’m trying to say after all of these hours traveling today, that the Republicans have gotten pretty much a free ride on that.”

    “And Mitt Romney has managed to pull the party together. And I think that’s partly because for all of the bitterness of that campaign, and for all of the more conservative Republican[s] and social conservatives who have longstanding, you know, doubts about Mitt Romney and his authenticity, they still, I think dislike Barack Obama more than they dislike Mitt Romney,” Mitchell, NBC’s chief foreign correspondent, told Maddow.

    The woman has forgotten the bitter battle between Obama and Hillary (Where is her feminist loyalty?).

    She is attempting to deflect attention away from the many democrats that have said they will not attend the Democrat convention and the former supporters of Barack Obama that have expressed disappointment in him and said they will not vote for him again.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/06/list-of-democrats-skipping-the-partys-national-convention-continues-to-grow/

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/black-pastor-tells-cnn-his-church-wont-support-obama-plan-to-stay-home/

    http://blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-obama-thrill-gone

    And my favorite prediction to date:

    http://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2012/05/30/why_obama_will_lose_in_a_landslide/page/full/

    most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad harbinger.

    Now to an analysis of the voting blocks that matter in U.S. politics:

    *Black voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. His endorsement of gay marriage has alienated many black church-going Christians. He may get 88% of their vote instead of the 96% he got in 2008. This is not good news for Obama.

    *Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida). This is not good news for Obama.

    *Jewish voters. Obama has been weak in his support of Israel. Many Jewish voters and big donors are angry and disappointed. I predict Obama’s Jewish support drops from 78% in 2008 to the low 60s. This is not good news for Obama.

    *Youth voters. Obamas biggest and most enthusiastic believers from 4 years ago have graduated into a job market from hell. Young people are disillusioned, frightened, and broke- a bad combination. The enthusiasm is long gone. Turnout will be much lower among young voters, as will actual voting percentages. This not good news for Obama.

    *Catholic voters. Obama won a majority of Catholics in 2008. That wont happen again. Out of desperation to please women, Obama went to war with the Catholic Church over contraception. Now he is being sued by the Catholic Church. Majority lost. This is not good news for Obama.

    *Small Business owners. Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I’m a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to give someone different a chance. I warned them that he would pursue a war on capitalism and demonize anyone who owned a business…that hed support unions over the private sector in a big way…that he’d overwhelm the economy with spending and debt. My friends didnt listen. Four years later, I can’t find one person in my circle of small business owner friends voting for Obama. Not one. This is not good news for Obama.

    *Blue collar working class whites. Do I need to say a thing? White working class voters are about as happy with Obama as Boston Red Sox fans feel about the New York Yankees. This is not good news for Obama.

    *Suburban moms. The issue isnt contraceptionits having a job to pay for contraception. Obamas economy frightens these moms. They are worried about putting food on the table. They fear for their childrens future. This is not good news for Obama.

    *Military Veterans. McCain won this group by 10 points. Romney is winning by 24 points. The more our military vets got to see of Obama, the more they disliked him. This is not good news for Obama.

    Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election day saying I didnt vote for Obama 4 years ago. But hes done such a fantastic job, I cant wait to vote for him today. Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job more secure?

    Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas oddsmaker and common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a world-class repudiation of Obamas radical and risky socialist agenda. It’s Reagan-Carter all over again.

    But Ill give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.

    Wayne Allen Root has a point. Clint Eastwood demonstrated that point beautifully!

  7. Tina says:

    Styne is divine with his, “Play Clinty for Me”

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/315658/play-clinty-me-mark-steyn

    Like William F. Gavin, I hugely enjoyed Clint Eastwoods turn last night, but Im not sure I agree that it was unintentionally hilarious and that he forgot his lines, lost his way. Clint is a brilliant actor, and a superb director of other actors (and I dont just mean a quarter-century ago: In the last five years, hes directed eight films). Hes also, as Mr. Gavin observed, a terrific jazz improviser at the piano and, in film and music documentaries, an extremely articulate interviewee. So I wouldnt assume that the general tenor of his performance wasnt exactly as he intended. The hair was a clue: No Hollywood icon goes out on stage like that unless he means to.

    John Hayward writes:

    The intended recipient was not Mitt Romney, the convention delegates, or even Republican voters, but rather wavering independents. Clint was there to tell them its OK to find Obama, his ugly campaign operation, and his increasingly shrill band of die-hard defenders ridiculous. Its OK to laugh at them.

    Im not sure he could have pulled that off if hed delivered a slick telepromptered pitch. As Mr. Hayward suggests, the hard lines packed more of a punch for being delivered in the midst of a Bob Newhart empty-chair shtick from the Dean Martin show circa 1968. Indeed, they were some of the hardest lines of the convention and may well prove the take-home (We own this country . . . Politicians are employees of ours . . . And when somebody does not do the job, weve got to let them go)…

  8. Chris says:

    Tina: “Outside the so-called conservative echo chamber you find the left-wing Obama swooning propaganda bubble.”

    Is there nothing in between?

  9. Toby says:

    I made a mistake. I didn’t think Clint was the right choice but wow was I wrong. Clint maybe ball those things Chris said but I can tell you Clint is not a liberal. Clint made a choice 4 years ago and now knows he was seriously in error. He came on national/international TV and confessed his error. A liberal will never ever do that.
    Between Clint and that ex-democrat from the other night the Left should be scared $hitless about the election.
    This is how I see it. Obama has lost all the republican votes he had. He had lost lets say 50% of the middle of the road votes he had. He has lost a good percentage of democrat votes. He has lost a percentage of the black vote. Not a chance in hell this election will even be close. It will be 1980 all over again. He has no one to blame but you, me, Bush, the republicans, the racist conservatives, Bush, Haliburton ( little nostalgia), The Swift Boat Vets, Big Oil, Bush, Bain Capital, Bush, Not spending more, and Bush. Did I mention Bush?

  10. Peggy says:

    “Im not sure he could have pulled that off if hed delivered a slick telepromptered pitch. As Mr. Hayward suggests, the hard lines packed more of a punch for being delivered in the midst of a Bob Newhart empty-chair shtick from the Dean Martin show circa 1968.”

    I knew I’d seen the empty chair skit done before, just couldn’t remember when and by whom. Thanks for the memory nudge.

    Mr. Eastwood is a very talented man who has given us years of great entertainment. He deserves better then to be attacked because of his age he didn’t deliver a perfect performance. Shame on anyone who lacks compassion and understanding and attacks someone’s abilities. I loved it!

    John 8:7
    “He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.”

  11. Tina says:

    Chris: “Is there nothing in between?”

    If it exists…let’s see the list.

  12. Tina says:

    Toby I’m pretty sure you remembered to mention Bush…we could check the transcript…but you did leave out old white men…lol!

    Never mind his age…Eastwood pulled that one off with his hairstyle alone!

  13. Chris says:

    Politifact and Fact Check should definitely be on that list, Tina. They evaluate statements from both parties and rate them true or false based on facts, not partisan bias. I can understand why your party finds that threatening, and wants to weaken the public’s trust in these organizations. There is no room for independent fact-checkers in your hyper-partisan, “us vs. them” world.

    Jon Stewart made an insightful comment about “Eastwooding” this week:

    “I could never wrap my head around why the world and the president that Republicans describe, bear so little resemblance to the world and and the president that I experience. And now I know why. There is a President Obama that only Republicans can see.”

    Republicans are arguing with an imaginary Obama; an empty chair.

  14. Post Scripts says:

    Chris will you go see 2016?

  15. Pie Guevara says:

    Today is National Empty Chair Day on Twitter #emptychairday.

  16. Chris says:

    No, Jack, I won’t. I believe that D’Souza’s theory that Obama is motivated by “Kenyan anti-colonialism” is dumb, baseless, and plays on racial and xenophobic anxieties. His book is also littered with basic factual inaccuracies, like his claims about the Winston Churchhill bust. I don’t expect any better from the movie.

    I’ve also never seen any of the “films” of Michael Moore, nor do I have the desire to. I try to avoid blatant propaganda pieces from both sides.

  17. Tina says:

    Politifact attempts to measure the truthfullness in the things politicians and others say…people don’t always agree with their conclusions.

    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/why-im-boycotting-politifact/

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/rachel-maddow-politifact-fired_n_1233411.html

    http://ajr.org/article.asp?id=5253

    This is what bothers me about your rabid insistence that you and you alone hold keys to the truth. You leave no room for opinion even when it is your own. You insist that your opinion about what someone has said is the truth and then attempt to bend others to your will.

    I see a number of brick walls in your future when dealing with others. I recommend that you open up and simply allow that people often disagree.

    Live long and prosper.

Comments are closed.