YOU DECIDE

Submitted by Harold

Imagine an Alternative Universe. Suppose that Rep. Paul Ryan had said that Joe Biden had “sullied the religion that he and I share.” How many days of the news cycle do you suppose would be dominated by the story? How many Democrats and members of the press would declare that this kind of religious provocation/bigotry rendered Mr. Ryan unfit for high office?

However in the political universe we endure, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said just that about Mitt Romney. Highlighting an Internet item, Reid said he agreed that Romney “sullied” the Mormon faith, and that, in Nevada , voters would “understand that he is not the face of Mormonism.”

Also Harry Reid, stated “a little birdie told me Romney paid no taxes for 10 years,” standards.


Consider the deviousness. By calling Romney a bad Mormon, Reid draws attention to Romney’s (and Reid’s) religion for the benefit of anti-Mormon bigots who may not have heard about Romney’s faith. Reid doesn’t fear such prejudices himself because a.) He was reelected to a six-year term in 2010, b.) He hails from Nevada , which boasts a large Mormon population, and c.) Religious prejudices rarely affect House or Senate races.

But really, saying someone “sullies” a religion? Where are Republican senators who should be demanding an apology at the very least.. Mr. Obama should be asked if he approves of this kind of character assassination.

We learned last week that Mr. Romney donated 29 percent of his income to charity in 2011, and that, over the course of the past 20 years, he has donated an average of 13.5 percent of his income — well over the 10 percent tithe that many great faiths suggest.

How much does Mr. Reid donate? We don’t know because he chooses to keep his tax returns private. We do know, however, that between 2000 and 2004, Mr. Obama donated about 1 percent to charity (he bumped it up to 5 percent in 2005 and to 22 percent last year).

“Lunch Bucket Joe” Biden — champion of the middle class — donated an average of $369 per year for the 10 years prior to 2008, or .03 percent of his income.

Not only has Romney been extremely charitable with his money, he has devoted his time to those (many in his church, some not) who were facing crises. He spent many hours with a 14-year-old cancer victim in the hospital. He saved a family of four from drowning when their boat capsized. When two teenagers in a Boston family were injured in a car accident, the entire Romney family showed up on Christmas Eve bearing large boxes of gifts, and a generous check for the parents. Romney also offered to pay for the boys’ college educations when they recovered. He closed Bain’s offices to search for the missing daughter of a colleague. These are but some of the many stories of personal generosity and remarkable kindness detailed in “The Real Romney” by Michael Kranish and Scott Helman, two Boston Globe reporters. Has Mr. Reid ever done anything comparable?

Since Sen. Reid has directed personal slanders against Romney, it’s worth noting that Mr. Romney earned his fortune by working in the private sector. Mr. Reid too is a wealthy man, with an estimated net worth between $3 and $10 million. Yet as Betsy Woodruff documents in National Review, he has acquired all of it while serving in public office, and while earning a salary of $193,400 or less. “I did a very good job investing,” he explained in 2010. If you believe that, Mr. Reid has a bridge to sell you. Really. In 2006, Reid earmarked $18 million to build a bridge across the Colorado River, between Laughlin , Nev. and Bullhead City , Ariz. , a project, Woodruff reports, “that wasn’t a priority for either state’s transportation agency.” Reid happened to own 160 acres of nearby land, whose value appreciated considerably after the project was approved.

Something is sullied here, but it isn’t Romney.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to YOU DECIDE

  1. Tina says:

    Harold you hit it out of the park with this one.

    Harry Reid is a one of the worst:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/11/AR2006101101640.html

    Harry M. Reid of Nevada, the Senate’s top Democrat, said yesterday that he was in discussions with the chamber’s ethics committee to determine whether he should amend his financial disclosure forms to include details of a real estate transaction that allowed him to collect $1.1 million.

    The Associated Press reported that Reid gained a windfall from that sale of land in 2004 even though he had not personally owned the property for the previous three years. Reid also did not divulge the 2001 transfer of the land to a company he co-owned with a friend, a transaction that would normally call for a mention in Senate financial disclosure documents, the AP said.

    And who could forget Hillary Clinton’s cattle futures “windfall”:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/stories/wwtr940527.htm

    Hillary Rodham Clinton was allowed to order 10 cattle futures contracts, normally a $12,000 investment, in her first commodity trade in 1978 although she had only $1,000 in her account at the time, according to trade records the White House released yesterday.

    The computerized records of her trades, which the White House obtained from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, show for the first time how she was able to turn her initial investment into $6,300 overnight. In about 10 months of trading, she made nearly $100,000, relying heavily on advice from her friend James B. Blair, an experienced futures trader.

    The new records also raise the possibility that some of her profits — as much as $40,000 came from larger trades ordered by someone else and then shifted to her account, Leo Melamed, a former chairman of the Merc who reviewed the records for the White House, said in an interview. He said the discrepancies in Clinton’s records also could have been caused by human error.

    Even allocated trades would not necessarily have benefited Clinton, Melamed added. “I have no reason to change my original assessment. Mrs. Clinton violated no rules in the course of her transactions,” he said.

    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1994-03-29/news/9403290222_1_cattle-futures-futures-trading-hillary-clinton

    The Refco Inc. broker who handled First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton’s futures-trading account in the late ’70s, when she netted about $100,000 in cattle futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, has been in trouble with industry regulators since 1970.

    Robert L. “Red” Bone, a commodity broker who once managed Refco’s Springdale, Ark., office, has been disciplined by the Merc and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for wide-ranging industry improprieties-some of them occurring in 1978 and ’79, about the time Bone was managing Hillary Clinton’s futures-trading account, according to industry records.

    At the time we were informed by commodities traders that turning a small investment into a million bucks is next to impossible!

    Shenanigans! It’s how they all get rich in DC

Comments are closed.