-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- Art (88)
- Behavior and Psychology (20)
- Business, Industry and Finance (63)
- Constitution and Law (370)
- Consumer Affairs (4)
- Culture (17)
- Deep State (5)
- Economy (3)
- Education (238)
- Environment (74)
- Fraud Alert (8)
- Global Issues (1)
- Health and Medicine (149)
- History (8)
- Humour (94)
- Military (115)
- Morals and Ethics (149)
- News Media (11)
- Police, Crime, Security (215)
- Politics and Government (144)
- Religion (91)
- Science and Technology (19)
- Veterans' Issues (13)
- World (12)
Recent Comments
- ClayPidgeon on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Michael Davis on Life In Chico and Other Places Infected by Bums
- Patricia Lieder on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
- Dawn on Thaddeus Kerns Boy Aviator
- scott sproat on Scam Calls from the American Police Association
Recent NorCal Blogs Posts
After America There is No Place to Run
By: Kitty Werthmann
What I am about to tell you is something you’ve probably never heard or will ever read in history books.
I believe that I am an eyewitness to history. I cannot tell you that Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history. We elected him by a landslide – 98% of the vote.. I’ve never read that in any American publications. Everyone thinks that Hitler just rolled in with his tanks and took Austria by force.
In 1938, Austria was in deep Depression. Nearly one-third of our workforce was unemployed. We had 25% inflation and 25% bank loan interest rates.
Farmers and business people were declaring bankruptcy daily. Young people were going from house to house begging for food. Not that they didn’t want to work; there simply weren’t any jobs. My mother was a Christian woman and believed in helping people in need. Every day we cooked a big kettle of soup and baked bread to feed those poor, hungry people – about 30 daily.
The Communist Party and the National Socialist Party were fighting each other. Blocks and blocks of cities like Vienna , Linz , and Graz were destroyed. The people became desperate and petitioned the government to let them decide what kind of government they wanted.
We looked to our neighbor on the north, Germany, where Hitler had been in power since 1933. We had been told that they didn’t have unemployment or crime, and they had a high standard of living. Nothing was ever said about persecution of any group — Jewish or otherwise. We were led to believe that everyone was happy. We wanted the same way of life in Austria . We were promised that a vote for Hitler would mean the end of unemployment and help for the family. Hitler also said that businesses would be assisted, and farmers would get their farms back. Ninety-eight percent of the population voted to annex Austria to Germany and have Hitler for our ruler.
We were overjoyed, and for three days we danced in the streets and had candlelight parades. The new government opened up big field kitchens and everyone was fed.
After the election, German officials were appointed, and like a miracle, we suddenly had law and order. Three or four weeks later, everyone was employed. The government made sure that a lot of work was created through the Public Work Service.
Hitler decided we should have equal rights for women. Before this, it was a custom that married Austrian women did not work outside the home. An able-bodied husband would be looked down on if he couldn’t support his family. Many women in the teaching profession were elated that they could retain the jobs they previously had been required to give up for marriage.
Hitler Targets Education – Eliminates Religious Instruction for Children: Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang “Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles,” and had physical education.
Sunday became National Youth Day with compulsory attendance. Parents were not pleased about the sudden change in curriculum. They were told that if they did not send us, they would receive a stiff letter of warning the first time. The second time they would be fined the equivalent of $300, and the third time they would be subject to jail. The first two hours consisted of political indoctrination. The rest of the day we had sports. As time went along, we loved it. Oh, we had so much fun and got our sports equipment free. We would go home and gleefully tell our parents about the wonderful time we had.
My mother was very unhappy. When the next term started, she took me out of public school and put me in a convent. I told her she couldn’t do that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful. There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun – no sports, and no political indoctrination. I hated it at first but felt I could tolerate it. Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home. I would go back to my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing. Their loose lifestyle was very alarming to me. They lived without religion. By that time unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler. It seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly. As time went along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasn’t exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy.
Equal Rights Hits Home: In 1939, the war started and a food bank was established. All food was rationed and could only be purchased using food stamps. At the same time, a full-employment law was passed which meant if you didn’t work, you didn’t get a ration card, and if you didn’t have a card, you starved to death. Women who stayed home to raise their families didn’t have any marketable skills and often had to take jobs more suited for men.
Soon after this, the draft was implemented. It was compulsory for young people, male and female, to give one year to the labor corps. During the day, the girls worked on the farms, and at night they returned to their barracks for military training just like the boys. They were trained to be anti-aircraft gunners and participated in the signal corps. After the labor corps, they were not discharged but were used in the front lines. When I go back to Austria to visit my family and friends, most of these women are emotional cripples because they just were not equipped to handle the horrors of combat.. Three months before I turned 18, I was severely injured in an air raid attack. I nearly had a leg amputated, so I was spared having to go into the labor corps and into military service.
Hitler Restructured the Family Through Daycare:
When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers. You could take your children ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days a week, under the total care of the government. The state raised a whole generation of children.. There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology. By this time, no one talked about equal rights. We knew we had been had.
Health Care and Small Business Suffer Under Government Controls: Before Hitler, we had very good medical care. Many American doctors trained at the University of Vienna . After Hitler, health care was socialized, free for everyone. Doctors were salaried by the government. The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors for everything. When the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40 people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were full. If you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for your turn. There was no money for research as it was poured into socialized medicine. Research at the medical schools literally stopped, so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries.
As for healthcare, our tax rates went up to 80% of our income. Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to establish a household. We had big programs for families. All day care and education were free. High schools were taken over by the government and college tuition was subsidized. Everyone was entitled to free handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing.
We had another agency designed to monitor business. My brother-in-law owned a restaurant that had square tables. Government officials told him he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump themselves on the corners. Then they said he had to have additional bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack bar. He couldn’t meet all the demands. Soon, he went out of business. If the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones existed, it could be in control.
We had consumer protection. We were told how to shop and what to buy. Free enterprise was essentially abolished. We had a planning agency specially designed for farmers. The agents would go to the farms, count the live-stock, then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to produce it.
“Mercy Killing” Redefined: In 1944, I was a student teacher in a small village in the Alps . The villagers were surrounded by mountain passes which, in the winter, were closed off with snow, causing people to be isolated. So people intermarried and offspring were sometimes retarded. When I arrived, I was told there were 15 mentally retarded adults, but they were all useful and did good manual work. I knew one, named Vincent, very well. He was a janitor of the school. One day I looked out the window and saw Vincent and others getting into a van. I asked my superior where they were going. She said to an institution where the State Health Department would teach them a trade, and to read and write.. The families were required to sign papers with a little clause that they could not visit for 6 months. They were told visits would interfere with the program and might cause homesickness.
As time passed, letters started to dribble back saying these people died a natural, merciful death. The villagers were not fooled. We suspected what was happening. Those people left in excellent physical health and all died within 6 months. We called this euthanasia.
The Final Steps – Gun Laws:
Next came gun registration.. People were getting injured by guns. Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms. Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily.
No more freedom of speech. Anyone who said something against the government was taken away. We knew many people who were arrested, not only Jews, but also priests and ministers who spoke up.
Totalitarianism didn’t come quickly, it took 5 years from 1938 until 1943, to realize full dictatorship in Austria . Had it happened overnight, my countrymen would have fought to the last breath. Instead, we had creeping gradualism. Now, our only weapons were broom handles. The whole idea sounds almost unbelievable that the state, little by little eroded our freedom.
After World War II, Russian troops occupied Austria . Women were raped, preteen to elderly. The press never wrote about this either.. When the Soviets left in 1955, they took everything that they could, dismantling whole factories in the process. They sawed down whole orchards of fruit, and what they couldn’t destroy, they burned.. We called it The Burned Earth. Most of the population barricaded themselves in their houses. Women hid in their cellars for 6 weeks as the troops mobilized. Those who couldn’t, paid the price. There is a monument in Vienna today, dedicated to those women who were massacred by the Russians.
This is an eye witness account. It’s true…those of us who sailed past the Statue of Liberty came to a country of unbelievable freedom and opportunity.
Latest Project
by Jack
As some of you already know I dabble painting in various mediums/styles as a rank amature. This is my latest done in acrylic. It shows much, much better in person, but the camera caught some of the subtle detail. I’ve been trying to perfect my clouds and this was the latest of 3 paintings where the clouds were fairly dominate. Critiques welcomed. You have to click on the picture to see it not quite so distorted.
The next one was another experimental, a totally different style, the only recognizable similarities are probably the clouds, but the technique is radically different than from above.
I’ve only done a handful of paintings, but people that have seen them have been encouraging me to do more. When I figure out what I like and what I’m best at that will be my theme for awhile. I am starting a little late in life to be a good artist, that takes decades and I don’t have decades, but for now it’s just good therapy…so, close enough.
Suckered: Survey Shows Voters Trust Democrats on Budget But Prefer Republicans on Fiscal Policy
by Tina Grazier
The Hill recently conducted a poll to find out what Americans think about budgetary issues and fiscal policy. The result is startling:
More voters trust the Democratic Party than the Republican Party on budgetary issues, according to the results of a new poll for The Hill — even though a strong majority actually prefer Republican fiscal policies.
The result of this poll suggest that the people have been suckered and it all comes down to branding, the latest buzz word used to describe the reputation and popularity of the Republican Party. I can agree that the reputation of the Republican Party is lousy but why do I insist the people have been suckered? Because although the Republicans have done a very poor job of branding themselves, the label plastered on them is highly deceptive, inaccurate, false! People have been persuaded, through a constant drumbeat of criticism, to believe that Republicans are greedy, selfish, and mean. It isn’t that their policies are adequately countered so much as their image has been tainted and trashed. A good portion of the citizenry strongly believes that Republican policies only help the wealthy and because of this misconception, they happily vote against their own self-interests.
It’s understandable that in 2008, in terms of the economy, Americans voted for the opposition party. Not only had the former Republican Congress and President Bush failed to adequately inform the public of the steps they had taken to start bringing down the debt they also engaged in unnecessary spending and backed away from making reforms that for decades they had claimed were necessary. However in 2012, after four years of failed Democrat leadership, it’s madness that President Obama was returned to office. His policies have failed to improve our overall economy Debt has increased dramatically under his leadership without damaging his image even though he ran for office the first time saying that Bush debt was “unpatriotic” and “irresponsible”. Obama has failed to spur vibrant growth or improve employment numbers following the recovery from recession in 2009. Obama has wasted taxpayer money by investing in risky, unproven technology. He has overseen an increase in student loan debt and increased the number of poor citizens requiring food stamps. Gasoline and food prices have gone up. Perhaps the worst policy of all is his signature healthcare legislation. It’s proving to be a regulatory nightmare and a very expensive new entitlement that will cost Americans more than promised and grossly damage the economy and the healthcare system itself. In the face of record unemployment and rising debt, Obama continues to send jobs and cash overseas, some of it to nefarious or dubious characters. And at a time when Wall Street is performing at record highs and the President is rubbing elbows with big corporate CEO’s and Hollywood big wigs it would appear the Democrat Party led by Barack Obama is serving the 1% on Wall Street over the 99% on Main Street. The Democrats have earned a brand and a label of disdain and yet the people seem to be totally unaware, giddily going about their business as if all is well simply by virtue of the mass deception.
We the people are not making decisions based on facts or the evidence that history can provide as guidance. The people have been deceived and there is no sign that the extremists in control of the Democrat Party, or the sycophant media that enables and abets their message, intend to back off or change their ways. Saul Alinsky messaging works dramatically for Democrats…in a demonic, underhanded, destructive way!
Republicans must to find a way to counter the negative branding and deliver the message of opportunity and growth that conservative policies create for all Americans. If they don’t, the party will simply cease to exist. Will they manage it? And if they don’t, how well will the conservative/libertarian branch do at creating a better image for the emerging party? The problem is the same however it turns out but we’re half way to the finish line if this poll is accurate. People already agree with policy; they just run away from scrooge image.
Spying in USA Rampant
Over the course of the Cold War and the ensuing decades of brush fire wars, the USA has racked up it’s share of enemies and economic competitors. Fortunately for us, only a handful of countries have the wherewithal to do us much real harm. However, those that have tried, such as China, Iran, Russia and North Korea have met with considerable success. They have reaped a bonanza in intelligence and stolen US technology. The tech theft is primarily targeted at defense secrets, but it also involves commercial developments. Then there are the waves of small cyber-attacks. They’re constantly probing our computer defenses, looking for ways to peek behind every closed door, from your personal computer files to the Pentagon.
Foreign students here on temporary visas made up 46 percent of science and engineering graduate students at Georgia Institute of Technology and Michigan State and 41 percent at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009, according to a federal survey. China sent 76,830 graduate students to U.S. universities in 2010-2011, more than any other country and up almost 16 percent from the prior year, according to the Institute of International Education in New York. Most of these students are not a threat, but those that are represent significant ongoing damage that can’t be sustained without grave consequences to the economy and our military.”Russian spy Lidiya Guryeva was pursuing a master’s degree in business at Columbia under the name of Cynthia Murphy. Guryeva was arrested for acting as an agent of a foreign power and deported back to Russia. Source: U.S. Department of Justice.
While most international students, researchers and professors come to the U.S. for legitimate reasons, there are some that are on covert missions. Universities are an “ideal place” for foreign intelligence services “to find recruits, propose and nurture ideas, learn and even steal research data, or place trainees,” according to a 2011 FBI report.
“In one instance described in the report, the hosts of an international conference invited a U.S. researcher to submit a paper. When she gave her talk at the conference, they requested a copy, hooked a thumb drive to her laptop and downloaded every file. In another, an Asian graduate student arranged for researchers back home to visit an American university lab and take unauthorized photos of equipment so they could reconstruct it, the report said.” Source Bloomberg
Most recently a 27 year old Chinese female posing as a student wooed a 59 year old Army Reserve Lt. Col. and defense contractor. She was able to get him to give up sensitive defense secrets before he was arrested by the FBI. This is an old tactic known in the spy trade at the Honey trap. Now former Lt. Col Benjamin Pierce Bishop sits disgraced in prison, his life ruined, wondering how he fell for such an obvious deception!
Moving closer to home, an unusual number of Chinese students enrolled at Sacramento State has caught the attention of the FBI and has raised concerns over a potential spying problem.
The FBI has warned the public many times that China has been recruiting graduate students and professors to teach in China for short terms, hoping to milk them for whatever sensitive information they may possess. More than one professor from CSU-Chico has been the guest of the Chinese government, teaching scientific subjects, but whether that was related to intelligence gathering or a simple academic outreach remains to be seen.
The Bloomberg news story previously noted said, “More Americans are heading overseas for schooling, becoming potential targets for intelligence services, Figliuzzi said. More than 270,000 Americans studied abroad for credit in 2009-2010, up 4 percent from the year before. President Barack Obama has announced an initiative to send 100,000 American students to China, and China has committed 10,000 scholarships for them.” This is is a brilliant scheme….for China, since most of the spy activity originates with them. And why not? They have the most to gain and the consequences are almost nil. America is like one big fat target, from the military to academia, to the private sector, all are potential targets for spy operations.
Most of the recent spying has come from student using their status to gain access to sensitive areas of research and at the same time to cultivate friendships among our instructors. teachers and researchers for future exploitation.
Thanks to outsourcing most of our industry, the last bastion of American exceptionalism is likely to come from our technological leadership. Currently, our technology outpaces the competition and our universities still turn out the best and brightest in their fields, but this may not always be the case if we continue on our current course.
What happens when India, China or Russia can graduate students with an education equal to our Ivy League Universities? What happens to our economy when we’re not the first in innovation anymore and the trade imbalance crushes the dollar? It doesn’t take much imagination to understand these things will take a heavy toll on us. And unless we are prepared to make a course correction, we’re going to have a chance to answer those questions and more. Chances are, we’ll see that happen before the next generation reaches retirement age.
One of Abraham Lincoln’s less known quotes may be one of his most prophetic. ” I see a very dark cloud on America’s horizon, and that cloud is coming from Rome.”
Bottom line: America is taking a beating from the vandals (spying) and the economic competition is fierce. So far we don’t have any good answers, unless hand wringing works.
Stomping on Gun Rights
The Blaze reports a case involving gross government overreach based on an anonymous busybody call:
The young man in the photo is the 11-yr-old son of Shawn Moore. The gun is a .22 rifle, a copy of the AR-15, but a 22 caliber. The photo was posted on Facebook by a proud father. That Facebook posting apparently triggered an anonymous call to New Jersey’s Department of Youth and Family Services (DYFS). On Friday night, March 15th, two representatives from the state’s social services office (along with four local police officers) came to the Moore home and demanded to see the family’s firearms.
According to Moore’s lawyer, Evan Nappen (an attorney with considerable expertise in NJ’s very strict gun laws), the situation was “outrageous.”Here’s what Moore alleges on the Delaware open carry forum:
•NJ’s Department of Youth and Family Services (DYFS) came to his home, accompanied by police officers. They claimed to be responding to a call about a photo of a young boy holding a firearm. (photo above)
•Without a search warrant, DYFS demanded entry into Moore’s home and access to all of his firearms. Moore was not initially there, but his wife called him.
•With his lawyer listening to the exchange on the phone with police and DFYS, Moore denied entry to his home and access to his safe where he stores his guns.
•When Moore requested the name of the DFYS representative, she refused to give it to him.
•After threatening to “take my kids,” the police and Family Services worker left — “empty handed and seeing nothing.”
I heard on Fox Business this morning that the boys father is a trainer in weapons use and safety.
So what do you think? Did the anonymous caller react too strongly? Were the authorities over the top with their pushy demands? Is this a case of liberal’s stomping on the rights of responsible gun owners due to their emotional reactions to unassociated criminal acts?
Dishonoring the Military
Posted by Tina
It’s bad enough that the military has been forced to cut funding for tuition support as part of the President’s outrage generating sequester since he has endorsed tuition support for people in some states that are living in the US illegally:
In states such as Massachusetts and California, illegal aliens are being given tuition assistance, while the U.S. government is cutting tuition assistance to service members returning from the battlefield.
“The Commander in Chief is using budget cuts and sequester as an excuse to cause financial pain to as many Americans as possible. It’s yet another Obama crisis that is completely manufactured,” claims former U.S. Marine, now a police officer, Lawrence Brown.
“In his goal of blaming the GOP, Obama supports states like Colorado, California, and Massachusetts who are lowering tuition for illegal aliens and giving the bill to taxpayers, and taking away our military’s tuition assistance,” Brown said.
Yep that’s bad enough but now Harry Reid hits an all time low. In remarks concerning the accidental training deaths of seven Marines in Nevada, Reid suggested the sequester was responsible for the deaths.
Mark Levin is one of many who slam Reid for his low of the low remarks:
“These men and women, our Marines were training there in Hawthorne. And with this sequester, it’s going to cut back this stuff. I just hope everyone understands the sacrifices made by our military.”
Blaming an unfortunate accident on the sequester? Really? This is politics of the lowest form! The man is such a weasel!
Ben Shapiro at Breitbart takes it a step further by explaining the reason this is so weasely:
It was Barack Hussein Obama’s idea to place the heaviest cuts in the sequester on the military. It was Harry Reid’s intransigence that refused to allow House bills that would have avoided cuts to the military to be brought to the floor of the Senate. And it was both Reid and Obama who stopped a Senate bill that would have allowed Obama to cut the sequestration amount largely at his discretion.
This is not new or accidental behavior. It isn’t part and parcel of an ooops moment. This is the way modern day progressive democrats do politics and it is a far cry from the kind of leadership that the American people want and need.
We have the power to rid ourselves of weasely politics. Our next opportunity to clean out the halls of Congress is a short two years away.
More on Minimum Wage
Posted by Tina
A few days ago National Review reported on a Senate Committee hearing in which Elizabeth Warren asserted her view that the minimum wage should be raised to keep up with inflation:
In a hearing of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions last week on “indexing the minimum wage,” Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren inquired of University of Massachusetts professor economics Arindrajit Dube, “If we started in 1960, and we said that, as productivity goes up — that is, as workers are producing more — then the minimum wage is going to go up the same. And, if that were the case, the minimum wage today would be about $22 an hour. So, my question, Mr. Dube, is what happened to the other $14.75?”
In the president’s State of the Union address, he proposed raising the minimum wage from its current rate of $7.25 an hour to $9. The former head of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, Christina Romer, has since taken to the pages of the New York Times to express her opposition to the proposal, which she argues “tends to be more popular with the general public than with economists.”
Her academic (emotional) approach to business and the economy is illustrative of the ignorance that colors public policy.
Michael Salstman of Politico:
An increase in someone’s hourly wage won’t translate to an increase in their annual take-home pay if they lose hours or employment as a result. That’s exactly what’s happening: Employers who keep just 2 cents to 3 cents in profit from each sales dollar (think: restaurants or grocery stores) can’t just absorb a 39 percent hike in labor costs. They either have to raise prices, or — more likely, given their cost-conscious customer base — find a way to provide the same product with less service.
This means fewer hours of work and fewer opportunities for less skilled groups like teens, who already face a 25 percent unemployment rate. That’s why a new Employment Policies Institute analysis of Census Bureau data finds that roughly 988,000 jobs would be lost because of the Harkin/Miller proposal, with 30 percent of the lost jobs occurring in the retail industry and 29 percent occurring in accommodations and food service.Harkin, Miller and Obama have directed legislators concerned about such consequences to a comforting study authored by economists affiliated with UC Berkeley. (One of them, Dr. Arindrajit Dube, is scheduled to testify at Thursday’s hearing.) Their study claims that, contrary to the vast majority of published economic literature on this issue, wage mandates do not reduce employment.
As the saying goes, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. The work of Dube and his co-authors received a devastating reply from a team of economists at the University of California-Irvine and the Federal Reserve Board. (It’s available now via the National Bureau of Economic Research.) Having analyzed and rechecked all the analysis in the original Berkeley studies, these economists determined that “neither the conclusions … nor the methods they use are supported by the data.”
They could, of course, ask business owners whose businesses would be affected adversely by this move…businesses that are more likely to have entry level employees…but that would be too easy.
Comments Off on More on Minimum Wage
Obama in Israel: Shouldn’t He Get the Map Right?
Posted by Tina
Pictures are meaningful and in terms of diplomacy it’s pretty important to make sure we get the images right. That’s why I find a story out of The Washington Free Beacon today a bit troubling:
The map of the Middle East displayed in an Obama administration video released days before President Barack Obama’s visit to Israel shows the Jewish state dispossessed of substantial parts of its current territory, including its capital.
The map of Israel, displayed repeatedly during the video, shows the Golan Heights, Jerusalem, northern Israel, and areas surrounding what is currently the West Bank as non-Israeli territory. The Golan Heights is shown as part of Syria; Jerusalem is shown as part of the West Bank; and northern Israel is shown as part of Lebanon.
The itinerary on the White House website also implies that Jerusalem is neither Israel’s capital nor even part of Israel.
The video, posted on You Tube, is also linked in the article. It’s hard to imagine that the President can position himself as an unbiased broker of peace when he has publicly put a stamp of approval on a map that bears no resemblance to current borders.
Non-Recovery Blues: Payrolls Still Slogging Along at the Bottom
Posted by Tina
The Obama non-recovery recovery has resulted in lost revenue to government and lost dollars for the American people. Wall Street Journal:
Unfortunately, America is experiencing nothing like a normal recovery. Government figures show that payroll employment is still 2.9 million below the pre-recession levels and 12.7 million below what a normal recovery would have delivered. The average real income of every individual is $702 less today than five years ago and $4,837 short of what an average post World-War II recovery would have generated. Compared with 2007, federal revenues in 2012 are down 5% nominally, and down 14% after inflation.
Obama and the Democrats must change course if they want the economy to boom.
Unfortunately, Reid’s proposals don’t signal even the slightest intention to address budget problems.
Rights at Risk
From Harold….
Ted Cruz v Dianne Feinstein…good video, your rights are at issue: