By Tina Grazier
“Every man for himself” is the way that many on the left characterize the philosophy of conservatism. Articulated most recently by Ronald Reagan when he spoke of the entrepreneurial spirit that built this great nation, rugged individualism is the desire of the individual to participate. Rather than being a selfish trait it is dynamic. The mischaracterization from the left reveals an arrogance of thought that oozes from gray matter incapable of appreciating the human spirit. How is it that this ridiculous definition continues given the history of innovation and prosperity of the United States? Chris Mathews offered a clue recently when he stepped forward to claim that if the Chilean miners were rugged individualists “they wouldn’t have gotten out, they would have been killing each other after about two days” (see video).
What a sad, or is it pathetic, notion of human capability! Chris believes that except for an elite few, human beings are helpless, needy slobs, lacking in the kind of self interest necessary even for preservation. He believes humans lack creativity, desire, urge, and intelligence. He believes that unless or until government steps forward to hold hands and provide funding and guidance a citizen’s world will not turn. He believes that you, dear reader, are nothing but a lump of clay requiring government hands to shape you into a neat little peg that will fit into an officially authorized and subsidized hole.
Dare I say it? What an idiot! Chris goes on to claim that the rugged individual is incapable of working with others. He implies that rugged individuals do nothing to assist others or contribute to anyone but themselves. History, of course, makes a sham of the man’s silly observations but he continues in his bigoted and arrogant observations!
Consider the many ways that individual Americans have taken matters into their own hands. From crossing the Great Plains to putting men into space rugged individuals have risked and worked with others to create new methods, products and technologies. By acting in their own interests, and taking the bull by the horns, they forged ahead and creatively grew cities and towns, businesses and products, methods and practices…including those that have made it possible for Chris Mathews to sit in his chair and talk to the entire world. What’s more, the prosperity and improved conditions that followed the efforts of these individuals created the wealth that build our universities, museums, hospitals, and other institutions and provided the backing and support that makes the arts possible. Government hasn’t exactly withered on the vine either!
Does conservatism embrace the “every man for himself” attitude characterized by Chris Mathews and others on the left? Hell no! Conservatism is a philosophy that believes every individual has great potential to become a responsible, contributing, satisfied member of society. Conservatism recognizes the creative spirit that innovates and also appreciates not only those who step forward to lead the way but also those who step forward to make the vision become viable in the world.
All work is honorable. Cooperative effort is a natural outcome that follows innovation of the entrepreneurial spirit. Providing for oneself through participation in this dynamic cooperative adventure is both honorable and invigorating. The rugged individual exists in every man if it isn’t beaten into submission by dictatorial powers from on high. Freedom is the atmosphere that allows the rugged individual in each of us take flight. Our resolve should be to encourage this in every citizen. Excessive government oversight, control and hand holding does nothing to inspire individuals.
By the way…the Chilean minors survived because a strong spirited group of individuals helped and supported each other. They were saved by the innovations that made recue possible.